Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Ras67/Archive 1

< User talk:Ras67
Latest comment: 7 years ago by MaryroseB54 in topic File:ExpansionOfMacedon.jpg
Learn more about this page
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ras67!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago97 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Ras67!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

 

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:10, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:DiscoveryRollout STS-124.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:DiscoveryRollout_STS-124.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Justass (talk) 00:11, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Better source request for Image:ET leaves MAF.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:ET leaves MAF.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. High Contrast (talk) 07:58, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bilder aus PDFs edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Ras67, wie holst du denn immer die Bilder aus den PDFs? Hab hier ein Crewfoto mit relativ guter Auflößung von STS-2 gefunden, aber kein Programm mit dem ich das machen kann. --myself488 (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Antwort hier

File source is not properly indicated: File:JanetLKavandi-NASA.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:JanetLKavandi-NASA.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:STS-130 ISS-22 Truss ESP3 ELC2.jpg edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Remove border edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for you cooperation! -- Ies (talk) 14:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome, Bitte schön :-)

FP Promotion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:STS-130 EVA3 Nicholas Patrick 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:STS-130 EVA3 Nicholas Patrick 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

STS-134 patch edit

File:STS-134 patch.png edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:STS-134 patch.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

----NavyBlue84 00:53, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Размещение моих фотографий под ником Ras67 edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Мои фотографии для статей "Дилювий" и "Скэбленд" под помещены несколько фотографий на Викисклад, они сохранились там, как вклад участника Ras67. Однако, от Ras67 на Викискадел есть и другие, не мои, фотографии. Я прошу учесть, что я, Рудой А.Н., являюсь либо автором помещенных фото, либо имею на них права, отмеченные в описании--Heljqfy (talk) 13:08, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Übrigens … edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

… hier mal ein kleines Dankeschön für Deine ganze crop-Arbeit :-) --:bdk: 14:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bitte schön :-)

FP Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ares I-X launch 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ares I-X launch 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for cropping File:Nelly Frijda.jpg! Kind regards, -- Deadstar (msg) 19:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome :-)

File:Dmitri Kondratyev.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Dmitri Kondratyev.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Sorry but this image is from Roscosmos, not NASA. Tm (talk) 01:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

ISS Expedition 25 patch edit

File:ISS Expedition 25 Patch.png edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:ISS Expedition 25 Patch.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

----NavyBlue84 17:52, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

nice seeing edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

nice seeing someone working on the Images with borders. cheers --DieBuche (talk) 19:47, 29 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome, Bitte schön :-)

File:Mappa ferrovie retiche.svg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks a lot, but I still don't understand what went wrong. I saved the source code, edited it with Notepad (Windows 2000), changed "rgb(0, 0, 0)" in line 19 to "rgb(255, 255, 255)" to remove the border, and it looked just fine in Firefox. Can you please explain what exactly caused this problem ? - Erik Baas (talk) 01:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately not, I guess your Firefox has converted the SVG source code in an incompatible manner. For instance in the original I don't find an "rgb" term:

<rect style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;fill-rule:nonzero;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:1.50000000000000000;stroke-linejoin:bevel;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1" id="rect5865" width="568.96063" height="492.52011" x="-8.6864223" y="-9.6537113" transform="translate(69.137299,266.63455)" />

Your code:

<rect style="fill: rgb(255, 255, 255); fill-opacity: 1; fill-rule: nonzero; stroke: rgb(255, 255, 255); stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-linejoin: bevel; stroke-miterlimit: 4; stroke-dasharray: none; stroke-dashoffset: 0pt; stroke-opacity: 1;" id="rect5865" width="568.96063" height="492.52011" x="-8.6864223" y="-9.6537113" transform="translate(69.1373, 266.635)"/>

The parameter of the fill command is changed from rhombus and hexadecimal ffffff to rgb and decimal (255, 255, 255).
In the second place the file says at the beginning it is encoded in UTF8, but Notepad saves per default in ANSI code, perhaps a fault.
Kind regards,--Ras67 (talk) 03:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Notepad is not the problem, Firefox is. There are 3 ways to save a SVG file:
  • right mouse button on image -> save link as...
  • click on image to let FF show the SVG -> save page as...
  • click on image to let FF show the SVG -> show source -> copy/paste to Notepad -> save as...
, and they all give totally different results... :-(
Thanks again, I got a bit wiser... ;-) - Erik Baas (talk) 22:01, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Good teamwork :-) Ras67 (talk) 22:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:STS-125 and STS-400 on Launch Pads.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:STS-125 and STS-400 on Launch Pads.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 15:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:JOC 1978 Vivre et ravailler au pays.png edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, you did a great job on a File:JOC Avenir Pro.png Could you please do the same for this image; TIA thcollet

Hey Ras67, can you tell us how (with what) you made the job? Von mir aus auch in Deutsch. ^^ Grüße --Perhelion (talk) 20:46, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hallo lieber Perhelion, das ist beileibe kein Geheimnis. Kurz gefasst: Erfahrung (logisch), Können und Geduld sind vonnöten. Fototipps und How to reduce colors for saving a JPEG as PNG erläutern schon eine Menge. Wenn ich über diese Seiten schon früher gestolpert wäre, hätte ich mir viel Probiererei ersparen können. Speziell bei den obigen Beispielen habe ich das Füllwerkzeug (Farbeimer) von Photoshop benutzt. Das sollte prinzipiell mit jeder Bildbearbeitungssoftware funktionieren. Das Problem ist, dass man für jede Farbe andere Werte bei der Toleranz ausprobieren muss. Übergänge Rot-Blau sind am schwierigsten, weil das Colorsubsampling diese Bereiche gnadenlos verwischt. Die besten Ergebnisse mit Photoshop erhalte ich, wenn ich beim Farbeimer "Glätten" deaktiviere und nur die aktuelle zusammenhängende Fläche ausfülle. Wenn man "Benachbart" deaktiviert, kann man die spezielle Farbe komplett im ganzen Bild ausfüllen, das geht aber nur bei starken Farben gut, bei Grau z. B. macht man zuviel in den Übergängen kaputt. Vor dem Ausfüllen habe ich die größten Fehlstellen mit dem Kopierpinsel entfernt. Die Schrift war viel Fummelarbeit, auch zwischen Meer (rot) und Land (blau) ist viel verlaufen. Da ich das Original nicht kenne, konnte ich nur vermuten, ob der Übergang hart war (wahrscheinlich) und durch die JPEG-Komprimierung so verlaufen ist, oder ob es schon in der Originalgrafik einen weichen Übergang gab. Die offensichtlichen Fehlstellen habe ich ausgebessert und die Übergänge eher weich gelassen. Wenn mir der erzielte Verlauf zwischen der weißen Schrift und dem roten Hintergrund (mit einem Schwarzanteil vermutlich durch JPEG-Kompression) nicht gefallen hat, habe ich das Originalbild geladen und dann mit dem Kopierpinsel, der ein paar Pixel breit war, die Übergänge wieder vom Original in die Bearbeitung kopiert. Zum Schluss muss man bei unregelmäßigen Formen mit dem Zauberstab rumprobieren (Toleranz und Antialiasing), was bei Schwarzanteilen im Übergang durch JPEG-Kompression meist seltsam ausgefressen aussieht. Bei regelmäßigen Formen wie z. B. einem Kreis kann man das Ellipsenwerkzeug nehmen, bei dem man einen perfekt antialiasden Übergang erzielen kann. Dann kopiert man sein Werk, erstellt eine neue Datei (geht bei vielen Programmen gleich in der richtigen Größe des vorher kopierten Werkes und mit transparentem Hintergrund) und fügt es dann ein. Als PNG abgespeichert und evtl. mit PngOptimizerCL optimiert und schon hat man eine relativ kleine PNG-Datei mit transparentem Hintergrund für Commons :-) Ras67 (talk) 20:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Der Kirschner Explication.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Danke, gut gemacht!--Kürschner (talk) 06:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bitte schön! :-)

File:Grindelwald Bachalpsee.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Would you please take a look at File:Grindelwald Bachalpsee.jpg ? Looking at the reflections in the water, I think it needs rotating 3 degrees CCW, but Finavon disagrees. - Erik Baas (talk) 11:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

In my opinion yes, about 2.5 degree ccw, but it is difficult to assess the perspective, spherical aberration and so on. This photo is probably from the same vantage point and shows the scene in similar angle like Grindelwald Bachalpsee.jpg. Coincidence? In this Category are good photos to comparison. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 18:52, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. But maybe it's a good idea to just have it deleted, and replaced by File:Bachalpsee reflection.jpg, which looks so much' better... - Erik Baas (talk) 21:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Map transparency edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Why here you made transparent neibour countries and provinces, and here only neibour countries are transparent, and neibour provinces are not transparent?--Anatoliy (talk) 22:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good question, the task was to remove the background, but was is the background? Without a precise description of the task, I can only guess. --Ras67 (talk) 22:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
In right top corner the small map located, in which you may see the provinces within country.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:34, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, but there is a discrepancy with the red area those describe the province und therefore i was unsure. --Ras67 (talk) 22:42, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Soyuz TMA-01M and Soyuz TMA-20 patches edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Soyuz TMA-01M and Soyuz TMA-20 patches are now officially released by Roscosmos. They are available from [1]. If possible could you please upload them to Wikipedia and add them to the relevant pages? I make this request since I am not sure of using the proper permissions. Thank you very much 152.226.7.202 00:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Soyuz-TMA-01M-Mission-Patch and Soyuz-TMA-20-Mission-Patch. You are welcome.

File source is not properly indicated: File:3-farell-5-Manuel-Solis.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

He gave source (Farell Private Collection) however it doesn't determine anything about the file itself. Its creation date, author are not known, though still file is double licensded - as a heir and an author, which makes no sense. Moreover, possesing a file doesn't mean that you own its copyrights and certainly its not written that. Therefore I tagged it and asked the uploader to clarify this situation. As you can read in his user talk, it's not the first time (not counting other files tagged by me). Sorry that I erroneously pasted the warning template in your user talk. Masur (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Maria Mandel.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Maria_Mandel.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 14:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Maria Mandel.jpg and metadata edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

The image File:Maria Mandel.jpg is a 2005 scan, that's a valuable information to be able to track the image source.

When you edit a picture, be very careful NOT TO lost ANY metadata information, saving the final output with full EXIF tags. --Dereckson (talk) 17:36, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Dereckson, usually I'm annoyed over the lost of metadata in edits from other users. In this case I assessed the information as irrelavant about scanner, time of scan and software, but of course it could be interesting. Kind regards --Ras67 (talk) 19:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Robert Matthew Thomson class photography project.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Ras67,
I would recommend you to upload your cropped-version also over File:Robert Matthew Thomson class photography project.jpg as I will not delete this one due to missing description at the other version. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Rafael Correa signature.png edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Rafael_Correa_signature.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 08:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:DB-Werbung 1980er Jahre "Alle reden vom Wetter. Wir nicht.".jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:DB-Werbung 1980er Jahre "Alle reden vom Wetter. Wir nicht.".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

sугсго 20:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token a4f419cb1b5cd69555e5c17103f06923 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Thank you edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just want to thank you for your edits on photos I uploaded! --Helmoony (talk) 05:18, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome :-)

Just curious edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why did you do a minor crop to File:GehlGreenchopper2010.jpg? Not offended, just curious. What you cropped off wasn't a border, it actually was asphalt from a highway. I cropped where I did so more detail could be seen of the machinery. I'm fine with what you did so I'll leave it alone. How did you even find it amongst the millions of images here? Royalbroil 04:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Royalbroil, that's not curious, i observe the category Images with borders and there your photo appears with the request from Bdk to remove the "border". That's all :-) Ras67 (talk) 19:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Phil Short (1969 photo).jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Phil_Short_(1969_photo).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Captain-tucker (talk) 17:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:ArmyTN.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:ArmyTN.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Reinhardhauke (talk) 21:34, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

5 Reichsmark edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Ras67, für das Buch "Wir vom Jahrgang 1942", Wartberg-Verlag, würde ich gerne deinen Scan des 5-RM-Scheins von 1942 verwenden. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:5rm-top.jpg Falls möglich bitte ich um einen kurzen schriftlichen Vermerk an der@textmaker.at, in dem Sie mir das für alle Auflagen der Publikation genehmigen. Als Fotocredit würde ich Ras67 angeben, es sei denn Sie wünschen etwas anderes. Als Bildgeber stünde Ihnen auch ein Belegexemplar zu, wenn Sie das in Anspruch nehmen wollen bitte um Bekanntgabe Ihrer Postadresse. Vielen Dank für Ihr Entgegenkommen, mit freundlichen Grüßen Helmuth Santler

Werter Herr Santler, ich habe die Datei nur beschnitten, sichtbar bei den Dateiversionen. Sie müssten sich an den Benutzer Larwe wenden, allerdings war das wohl sein einziger Upload unter diesem Account. Meines Wissens entstehen durch Einscannen keine neuen Urheberrechte, sie können also die Datei frei verwenden, weil der Inhalt gemäß dem deutschen Urheberrecht gemeinfrei ist (Amtliches Werk). Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 22:06, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:In Nacht und Eis (Titanic sinking).jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:In_Nacht_und_Eis_(Titanic_sinking).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 19:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Schallenberg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Halo Ras67, Du hast mehrere Schallenberg Bilder neu hochgeladen. Was genau hast du daran verändert? Ich seh da irgendwie keinen Unterschied. Gruss --Nienetwiler (talk) 13:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Nienetwiler, die beiden Bilder wurden von Herzi Pinki zum Beschneiden getagt, so dass ich mit Jpegcrop den dunklen Streifen am rechten Rand mit acht Pixeln „verlustlos“ entfernt habe. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 16:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bob McCall with wife.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why did you upload a file that was 20x the file size of an already high quality image?--Craigboy (talk) 04:16, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Craigboy, your image was a downsized version of the high resolution NASA original. Commons wants the highest available resolution/quality e.g. for printing. For the MediaWiki software it makes no difference whether the file is small or big. Here are the guidelines: FAQ and Why we need high resolution media? Kind regards --Ras67 (talk) 17:54, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Art Tatum, Vogue Room 1948 (Gottlieb).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Art Tatum, Vogue Room 1948 (Gottlieb).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:59, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Vulvae.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Please upload your revised image version under a new name (instead of overwriting the previous image), for reasons explained at User_talk:Kintetsubuffalo. Thank you. AnonMoos (talk) 10:13, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks... AnonMoos (talk) 03:19, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
:-) Ras67 (talk) 20:46, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

...for all the cropping of images you've done and another thank you for being so quick about it :) Cheers, jonkerz♠ 00:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome :-) Ras67 (talk) 20:46, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

msg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi there. I was talking to a contact of mine, hopefully a future Wikipedian, about proper attribution of NASA images. So he suggested this edit, and other expedition captions need to be fixed accordingly. Do I have a go for this? Thanks. --Elitre (talk) 13:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Elitre, your edit is OK - be bold! You don't need my permission. I'm a normal Wikipedian too. Greetings --Ras67 (talk) 20:46, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hine's photo edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, I appreciate your cropping this image[2], but I'm curious why you drained the color out of it? As you can see from Hine's wikipedia entry [3], Hine's photographs are well-known enough that they're usually presented in the way they were initially presented. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 23:05, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, the picture is obviously a black and white photography. I removed the yellowish discoloration "losslessly", so that Jpegcrop's cropmask better fitted. Jpegcrop can only crop alongside a 16 pixel border on YCbCr 4:2:0 color subsampling, instead 8 pixel without colors. If desired, I can normally process the picture without limitation, but this is not lossless, although the generation loss is small. Greetings, Ras67 (talk) 00:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ah, okay, many thanks for letting me know. Quite complicated, I see. Thanks for your efforts. Is there a way to normally process the picture, so that more of the 'discoloration' is retained, if you see what I mean? Thanks! MarmadukePercy (talk) 06:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Now, the image was normally cropped and slightly leveled. I've converted the 'colors' from Adobe RGB 1998 to sRGB IEC61966-2.1, because the most browsers don't interpret color profiles and sRGB is the standard. If this 'colors' ever were intentional, i can not tell. --Ras67 (talk) 17:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

La Leçon de musique edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Ras67, well done! Thank you very much. --Thorvaldsson (talk) 19:20, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome. :-)

The Royal Palace, Stockholm edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I just wanted to say thank you for assisting with both cropping and color-adjusting the old images of the Royal Palace in Stockholm! Thanks! /Urbourbo (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

PS. Also these images would benefit from your excellent color correction work:
Thanks again, /Urbourbo (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
See also my answer to your question here: File talk:Victoriasalongen.jpg. /Urbourbo (talk) 07:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
You are welcome. --Ras67 (talk) 15:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pillar edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Oops. How embarrassing. Good thing one of us was paying attention. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

That can happen :-)

Proposed design for flag for Confederate States of America 1862.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hello again. Noticed your 'losslessly cropping' this image. The point of this is to maintain the rough edges of the image so that it can be seen as an original watercolor. Could you please try again, or I'll take it to the workshop? If you're unable to do that, let me know and I'll simply revert. Thank you. MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that's correct. Please do not straighten the image, but simply lose the black background. That's the point here, to retain the nature of the amateurish authorship of the original image. If you need guidance, I can supply you with past images where this has been done.[4] Thanks. MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your efforts. This image now has lost its initial color, the borders are uneven, and it doesn't look remotely like the image I uploaded. I'll revert, thanks. MarmadukePercy (talk) 01:35, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Parasol-macrolepiota procera.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Ras67, vielen Dank das Sie den Rand entfernt haben! Das war wirklich sehr nett von Ihnen! Ich mußte ein wenig schmunzeln, da wir beide genau zur selben Zeit die selbe Idee hatten:o)!Nochmals vielen Dank und viele Grüße H. Krisp (talk) 16:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hallo H. Krisp, das Bild wurde zum Beschneiden getagt und ich war sozusagen ein paar Minuten schneller als Sie. Es ist natürlich immer besser, wenn der Ersteller seine eigenen Dateien mit evtl. höherqualitativem Quellmaterial bearbeitet. Grüße zurück :-) Ras67 (talk) 17:30, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Thüringerwald.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hey Ras67! File:Thüringerwald.JPG hat eine ziemlich schlechte Qualität. Könntest ja bei Zeiten verlustfrei aus dem Original ausschneiden, Quelle ist in Dateibeschreibung verlinkt. Grüße --myself488 talk 18:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Super, danke dafür. --myself488 talk 07:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Agabayzade Sadiq.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Agabayzade_Sadiq.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PANONIAN (talk) 19:49, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bangladeshi Passport.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Bangladeshi_Passport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

 Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Soyuz TMA-22 patch edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Ras67, Thank you for providing space images to the Wikimedia Commons. Could you kindly upload the Soyuz TMA-22 patch with proper licensing etc (and include it in Wikipedia Soyuz TMA-22 page). The patch is now available from Roscosmos pages: [5] 152.226.7.211 11:39, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Soyuz-TMA-22-Mission-Patch You are welcome. --Ras67 (talk) 17:30, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Danke edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, ich wollt mich einfach nur mal bedanken für Deine vielen fleissigen "crops". Gruß --JuTa (talk) 20:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Alles klar JuTa, ich mache das vor allem, weil sich die Arbeit ja häufig nicht auf simples Beschneiden beschränkt. So müssen Wasserzeichen oder Hintergründe entfernt, Tonwertkorrekturen vorgenommen, Bilder gedreht, oder Metadaten und Beschreibungen ergänzt werden. Es ist immer eine neue Herausforderung und schlechter wird man durch das Training ja auch nicht. ;-) Herzliche Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 23:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Falls Du Dich bei Bildern mit Wasserzeichen austoben möchtest: auf Category:Images with watermarks gibt's viiiieeel zu tun :) (falls DU's noch nicht sebst endeckt haben solltest). Gruß --JuTa (talk) 13:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hallo JuTa, die Kategorie kannte ich bereits und war erschlagen über die Menge der mehr oder weniger verhunzten Bilder. Das Entfernen der Watermarks mache ich im Wesentlichen nur im Rahmen des Croppings, da ja sonst noch einmal ein Generationsverlust bei JPEG-Dateien auftritt, wenn jmd. anders vielleicht, bei 9.367 Dateien in ein paar Jahren, das Wasserzeichen entfernt. Außerdem ist das Entfernen der Wasserzeichen meist recht diffizil, wenn es unauffällig sein soll, da stecke ich die Zeit lieber in die Crops und sonstige Bildverbesserungen. Viele Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 16:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Mary Magdalene Church, Venustiano Carranza, Federal District, México07.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Peace and all good!

Tanks!

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 10:48, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome :-) Ras67 (talk) 16:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you for the crops & fixes on all these images. Much appreciated. MarmadukePercy (talk) 20:35, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome :-) Ras67 (talk) 16:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
The care you've taken with the images, and the adding of templates, locations, etc., is much appreciated. Thanks again and enjoy your evening. MarmadukePercy (talk) 22:54, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bildbeschneidung edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo.
Warum sind Bilder mit Rahmen unerwünscht?
Im Falle von: BER 2010 war es Teil des Bildkonzeptes und sah auf der entsprechenden Wikiseite sehr gut aus - also recht schade jetzt, wie ich finde.

Grüße --CellarDoor85

Hallo CellarDoor85, bei Commons sind Rahmen, Wasserzeichen usw. generell unerwünscht, weil sie die freie Weiterverwendung der Bilder auch außerhalb der Wikipedia erschweren. Ich finde eigentlich, dass die Seite ohne „Rahmenbild“ ganz gut aussieht, mit Rahmen verkleinert sich ja der wichtige Bereich nochmals. Wenn Du allerdings unbedingt ein Bild mit Rahmen in den Artikel einfügen willst (natürlich ohne Garantie, dass das akzeptiert wird), kannst Du ja das Original mit einem anderen Namen ohne Rahmen hochladen und wir revertieren diese Version und fügen das tag {{Border is intentional}} hinzu. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Dem kann ich mich Ras67 nur anschließen, der Rahmen ist überflüssig vor allem so ein einfacher. Sowas kannst du auch einfach mit anderen Mitteln (wenn überhaupt) bewerkstelligen. Was ist eigentlich mit deiner Benutzerseite? @Ras67 Warum kein lossless crop? Wobei das Bild etwas an Qualität verloren haben dürfte, da es jetzt schon mindestens 2 Mal nachkomprimiert wurde. Daher schlage ich vor solltest du einfach ganz normal das Original hochladen. PS: Kann jemand die Fehlfunktion beim Cropbot nachvollziehen? -- Perhelion (talk) 18:39, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hallo Perhelion, meinst Du vielleicht CellarDoor85? Ich hab mit meiner Benutzerseite keine Probleme, könntest Du da genauer sein? Lossless versus normales Cropping muss man immer abwägen, im obigen Fall wären durch das 4:2:0 Color subsampling 14 px oben und links verlorengegangen, bei der relativ geringen Auflösung für mich nicht akzeptabel. Außerdem haben „gerade“ Auflösungen wie 1600 x 900 px auch was für sich. Es wäre natürlich schön, wenn CellarDoor85 eine neue Version ohne Rahmen hochladen würde, der Qualitätsverlust ist momentan aber noch sehr gering. Den Cropbot benutze ich nicht, ich bearbeite die Dateien lieber lokal, das bischen Down- und Upload stört mich nicht. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Ecartan.jpeg : Thank you edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, thank you for your improvements on the Elie Cartan's photo. Regards, Kertraon (talk) 12:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

STS-135 PicoSat Deployment edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

If possible, could you add the NASA video of the picosat deployment? (it is available in NASA web sites) The current figure on the STS-135 web pages seems to be not informative. As the satellite is not so clear in the image. Thank you very much 152.226.6.204 02:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've made two versions STS-135 Picosat deployment.ogv and STS-135 Picosat deployment.gif. You're welcome --Ras67 (talk) 22:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Cloud applications.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cloud applications.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Rosenzweig δ 19:30, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:141037main capsule-1-250.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hey Ras67, da hat jemand ziemlich gepfuscht mit dem zurechtschneiden, könntest ja mal aus dem verlinktem Original den Bereich verlustfrei croppen. Grüße --myself488 talk 08:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dankeschön. --myself488 talk 17:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hast jetzt auch die Rechte zum selber Dateiverschieben, macht das Leben hier leichter. Grüße --myself488 talk 20:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Danke, das macht vieles einfacher. :-) --Ras67 (talk) 22:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

lossless cropping edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Ras67!

The file size of File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F088809-0038, Berlin, East Side Gallery.jpg has increased, this is a clear sign for a none-lossless cropping. Please use a lossless cropping tool. I have reverted you edit. --ALE! ¿…? 13:46, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lieber ALE!
das hatte schon so seinen Grund. Leider gibt es beim verlustlosen Beschneiden einige wichtige Einschränkungen, die es in einigen Fällen unpraktikabel machen. Bei 4:2:0 Farbunterabtastung zum Beispiel müsste man oben 15 Pixel verwerfen, um den störenden schwarzen Strich links oben zu entfernen. Unten und rechts kann man zwar pixelweise beschneiden, allerdings werden die betroffenen Blöcke nicht kleiner neu berechnet, sondern so gelassen und der beschnittene Bereich einfach nicht mehr angezeigt. So weit so gut, allerdings folgt direkt daraus folgendes unschönes Verhalten: Beim Skalieren der Bilder vorzugsweise bei 220 Px wird der gesamte ehemalige 8 x 8 Block ausgewertet auch die abgedeckten Bereiche, so dass unten am ehemaligen weißen Absatz wieder ein schwacher sichtbarer weißer Streifen entsteht.
In Anbetracht dieser Umstände und des extrem guten Photoshop-JPEG-Exportfilters und ziemlich niedriger Kompression habe ich mich für die „Verlust“-variante entschieden, wo diese ganzen Probleme nicht auftreten. Nebenbei werden sogar die runter gerechneten Vorschaubilder besser, weil meine Photoshopvariante keine Farbunterabtastung mehr verwendet und so in den Thumbnails das Rot nicht mehr so gnadenlos verwischt. Und die doppelte Größe sollte ja nun kein Problem sein, resultiert sie doch auch aus dem Bestreben den Generationenverlust zu minimieren.
Schön, dass jmd. mal auch auf sowas achtet, allerdings habe ich schon so viele „sachkundige“ Verhackstückelungen von JPEGs gesehen, wo mir die Augen getränt haben, was aber in der Regel niemanden auffällt oder interessiert. Natürlich kann ich das auch verlustfrei unter den oben beschriebenen Einschränkungen machen, allerdings wird das Ergebnis in der Summe schlechter sein als jetzt. Viele Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 15:45, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hallo Ras67! Danke für die sehr ausführliche und sehr detaillierte Erklärung. Man lernt nie aus ;-) . --ALE! ¿…? 07:12, 17 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Helpless_CBT_by_Balzac.png edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Helpless_CBT_by_Balzac.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Liberaler Humanist (talk) 11:20, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-12835, Schweden, Polizei-Patrouille.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Did you by any chance mistakenly re-upload the uncropped version? The Bundesarchiv caption is still in the image :-) --Bensin (talk) 23:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nope, old version cached on your side? Greeting --Ras67 (talk) 23:55, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yup. My fault... No wait: My browser's fault. I apologize... No wait: My browser apologizes ;-) Thanks for cropping! --Bensin (talk) 02:41, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
For the valuable work of losslessly cropping hundreds or thousands of images. ALE! ¿…? 07:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much :-) --Ras67 (talk) 23:55, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Normannen.png edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This file doesn't give a complete account of the norman territories in the mid XII century. All the coast of the present Tunisia, till Bona at west and Tripoli (Libia) at west was a norman territory for a quite long period (since 1148 to 1160). See for exemple this paper. Unfortunately I'm not able to modify the map (you are the last contributor). Do you think that it would be suitable to modifiy it ? Sincerely --Gmelfi (talk) 10:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your explanation was useless for me. I took this source: http://secretsun.blogspot.com/2011_08_01_archive.html
I hope the new map is correct, especially Malta and Kerkennah Islands. Feedback is welcome for a correction. --Ras67 (talk) 22:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hinweis edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, bzgl. deinen Änderungen bei File:Straßburg (DerHexer) 2010-12-20 031.jpg siehe de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Mach aus 3D einmal 2D. Bei deiner Bildbearbeitung scheinst du von falschen Voraussetzungen ausgegangen zu sein, da die Aufnahme vom Fotografen = Uploader ordentlich lizenziert worden war. Grüße --FordPrefect42 (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:FirstSurahKoran.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:FirstSurahKoran.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:35, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Tracy Caldwell Dyson in Cupola ISS.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tracy Caldwell Dyson in Cupola ISS.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Ras67,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
  
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

pdf rotation edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Ras67, thanks for your rotation @ File:Feaux de Lacroix - Über den Anteil des Sauerlandes an den grossgeschichtlichen Bewegungen des späteren Mittelalters.pdf. Do you know why it doesn't display correct (a MediaWiki bug?)? In my pdf viewer (okular) it is correct. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 04:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Saibo, nach einiger Recherche habe ich die Ursache für das seltsame Verhalten von MediaWiki im Zusammenhang mit PDF-Dateien gefunden. Das von MediaWiki eingesetzte Tool „Pdfinfo“ ermittelt nur die physischen Parameter des eingebetteten Bildes der PDF-Datei (Maße) in diesem Fall hochkant, während ImageMagick, der Teil der für die Darstellung des Ganzen zuständig ist, auch Rotation tags verarbeitet und das Bild liegend rendert. Die Vorschau sieht nur deshalb so komisch aus, weil Pdfinfo sagt da ist ein Hochkantbild aber ImageMagick es korrekt liegend rendert. Warum man Pdfinfo so belässt, erschließt sich mir nicht, vor allem weil man ja bei JPEGs erst vor kurzem die Verarbeitung von EXIF Rotation tags eingeführt hat, was bei falsch gesetztem Tag zu solchen Problemen führt. So wie die Situation jetzt ist, darf man die Bilder nicht per Rotation tag drehen, sondern man muss das physisch am Objekt tun. So habe ich die JPEGs extrahiert, mit Jpegcrop verlustlos gedreht und aus diesen gedrehten Bildern wieder eine PDF gebastelt. Hier ging das noch, bei dicken Büchern ist das keine empfehlenswerte Vorgehensweise. Vielleicht wird Pdfinfo mal in Rente geschickt und durch ein Tool ersetzt, was auch virtuell gedrehte Bilder erkennt, wie alle anderen aktuellen Programme auch. Viele Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 17:58, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hallo Ras67, super, danke! Übrigens, falls du es nicht weißt, genau das (File:2004-10-23_Römer_klein.jpg#filehistory) macht Rotatebot auch - also einfach das Drehscript benutzen und es Rotatebot machen lassen.
Wenn die Mediawiki-Tools die PDFs also falsch bearbeiten (inkonsistent die Drehung zwar zu beachten, aber nicht die Breite anzupassen), dann sollten wir das als Bug melden, falls es ihn noch nicht gibt. Hast du danach zufälligerweise schon geschaut? Ansonsten mache ich das mal. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 19:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm, bei Bugzilla gibt es ja einen Bugreport für MediaWiki extensions - PdfHandler mit dem Status RESOLVED WONTFIX, also ist das eine Designfrage deren Gründe ich nicht kenne. Ob bei Wikipedia diese Softwarekomponenten so eingesetzt werden, ist nur eine Vermutung von mir, weil es so gut passt. Ob ein Bugreport oder Hinweis schon existiert, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Bei Bugzilla ist es ja kein Bug. Zitat: This is not an MW/extension bug. Problem is that PdfHandler gets the PDF page dimension with a call to the pdfinfo command (an Xpdf tool). But pdfinfo returns the *physical* page dimension, not the *displayed* page dimension (i.e. it does not take into account the page rotation parameter; not really a bug, just a design choice).
Als Lösung wird vorgeschlagen Solutions are: 1) use something else and not pdfinfo 2) apply the following patch to pdfinfo. Ob das eine Lösung für Wikipedia sein könnte, kannst Du ja an den richtigen Stellen klären lassen.
Die Sache mit File:2004-10-23_Römer_klein.jpg#filehistory ist ein bisschen tricky, der Rotatebot hilft dort nicht weiter. Hier lag der umgekehrte Fall vor: ein liegendes Bild mit gesetztem Orientation Tag rotate left aus einer Kamera, wo das Bild ja physisch immer ‚liegt‘. Allerdings hatte der Fotograf das Bild physisch aufgerichtet und das Orientation Tag rotate left so belassen. Das hat nicht weiter gestört, da Mediawiki das nicht ausgewertet hat. Mit Einführung der Auswertung der Orientierung werden die Vorschaubilder automatisch gedreht (hier 90° nach links). Allerdings war das Bild schon gedreht und wurde nun um 90° weiter gedreht und das physisch aufrechte Bild in das nun wieder liegende Vorschaubild geqetscht, was sehr komisch aussieht. Ein weiteres Drehen mit was auch immer bringt da gar nichts, ich habe nur das EXIF Orientation Tag auf don't rotate zurückgesetzt. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 01:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Jpg: Doch, Rotatebot hätte genau dasselbe gemacht wie du (ich weiß es, ich habe selbst daran - nach der EXIF-Geschichte - mitprogrammiert). :-) Die in {{Rotate}} angegebenen Rotationswerte beziehen sich auf die Thumbs von Mediawiki - also inkl. Drehung durhc (evtl. falsche) EXIF-Tags. Schau einfach in die Beiträge von Rotatebot, da hat er aufgelistet, was er gemacht hat. Solche Jpgs mit falschen EXIF-Tags sind oft, weil manche Software eben EXIF total ignoriert und daher nach dem Drehen am heimischen PC das EXIF-Tag der Camera belässt. Hier Commons:Village_pump#Autorotation_using_EXIF_tag_with_MW_1.18 gibts übrigens die ganze Problematik zum nachlesen - falls du es noch nicht kennst und es dich interessiert.
Pdf: Ich habe ihn einfach reopened. Sollen die sich drum kümmern - mir egal wie. ;) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:45, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Danke edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 

Vielen Dank für die vielen Dateiüberarbeitungen und Verbesserungen. Deine Beiträge sind sehr hilfreich.
Lass es dir schmecken ;-)

--McZusatz (talk) 14:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm lecker, danke :-) Ras67 (talk) 23:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oval crop edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Can you please help me oval-crop and clean up these two: File:William Tenooe1.jpg and File:John Honoree1.jpg? Thanks. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:59, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome --Ras67 (talk) 23:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks again.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 00:23, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Jebel Arkenu edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Ras

I confirm that the Image Jebel Arkenu .jpg comes from the NASA site which is in the description page. I checked in the history of my browser and the link is still there. Bye alex2006 (talk) 07:56, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your co-operation. If this special photo is not yet there, we have many high resolution alternatives. --Ras67 (talk) 14:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Your image came from here and is probably not a NASA file. --Ras67 (talk) 21:51, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Pere Colom lesbo 1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Pere_Colom_lesbo_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail 17:08, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pere Colom lesbo 1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, you have added an image above to Wikimedia Commons, i would like to thank you for making this project develop and grow. Unfortunately it seems that it has been nominated for deletion, this means that it can be deleted due to the fact that it is partially sexual in nature. Do not feel disheartened, many of the sexual images are kept here, and hopefully this one will also. But i thought that you might be interested that there are projects which are more interested in sexually explicit and freely licenced material, like Freedom Porn which distributes its content under Free Art Licence or in public domain. You may want to check it out and see if you would be interested in uploading there as well as here. VolodyA! V Anarhist (talk) 2011Nov23 17:21

I've only cropped this file, Pere55 is the original uploader, the deletion request was anyway refused. --Ras67 (talk) 23:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Mars rocks.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hey Ras67, mal wieder ein Bild mit niedriger Auflösung. Wäre nett, wenn du es aus dem Original ausschneiden könntest. Der Link ist in der Dateibeschreibung. Grüße --myself488 talk 15:08, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Danke :-) --myself488 talk 17:53, 27 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Bitte, ich habe die unkomprimierte TIFF genommen, allerdings sieht es aus, als ob die NASA-Jungs eine 1000 Pixel GIF aufgeblasen haben, sonderlich scharf ist die HiRes-Version nicht. Na ja, wahrscheinlich konnte der kleine Sojourner 1997 auch keine viel besseren Bilder machen. --Ras67 (talk) 23:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for cropping (ROSSA.jpg) edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

But I wanted to ask, was there a problem with the descriptions in other languages ? you appear to have deleted them ? [6] But many thanks for the english improvements... Penyulap (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure, what you mean, i have deleted the check categories tag that also shows the usage in other projects however no descriptions in other languages. Greeting --Ras67 (talk) 00:40, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
On the last diff under history it seems to show the descriptions in Russian and so forth had been deleted, however, when I set prefs to Russian and look at the old version, the Russian description doesn't come up anyhow, so I don't know what it is supposed to do, maybe it's some experimental thing. I guess I can just add all the languages to the single description as a temporary measure. Unless you know how it's meant to be done ? When you upload the pic it asks for descriptions in other languages, you can add them then, but I can't see how to view those descriptions. Penyulap (talk) 06:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Liberty Launch Vehicle edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Ras, just wondering where you obtained File:Liberty Launch Vehicle.png. The source you provided is a distinctly different image, and I cannot locate a NASA source anywhere for this particular graphic. Thanks. — Huntster (t @ c) 10:12, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

You have right, the reason for this problem is the strange behavior of NASA. Under this URL with the same ID KSC-2011-8113 NASA released Liberty Launch Vehicle.png of course as a JPEG with a white frame. Hours later the picture was replaced by the current version. I don't know why NASA has withdrawn the first version. Maybe because of the CST-100 spacecraft on the top of the rocket. It is impossible to prove the origin of NASA. If my oath should be not enough, you may delete the picture. Greeting --Ras67 (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I had a feeling this was what happened. Strange that it happened, but I have no problem with it remaining, if I don't happen across a copyright statement. It may be possible that the NASA webmaster simply uploaded the wrong image, or the wrong picture was provided, and then fixed the mistake, in which case the public domain statement is null and void (if NASA doesn't have the right to release something into the public domain, then it obviously isn't public domain). Thanks for the response! — Huntster (t @ c) 04:16, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

thank you edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you for fixing my photograph File:St. Casimir Vilnius.JPG. How did you do it? Is it possible to fix File:Stikliu-street-vilnius.jpg?--Umnik (talk) 15:46, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

There is a good perspective correction tool at Paint Shop Pro. The problem is to find the right balance between correction and natural look. The eye and brain work not like a camera with shift lens. I will correct your other photo. Greeting --Ras67 (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
File:Stikliu-street-vilnius.jpg Wow!Wow! I thought that such correction reduces sharpness, but sharpness is OK in both photographs.Thank you.--Umnik (talk) 09:15, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yes that's right. The barrel distortion correction tools blurs a little bit more than the perspective correction tool by PSP but within limits. The selective sharpener in Photoshop balances the whole back. --Ras67 (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:ExpansionOfMacedon.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:ExpansionOfMacedon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MaryroseB54 (talk) 08:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ras67/Archive_1&oldid=258836383"
Return to the user page of "Ras67/Archive 1".