User talk:ALE!/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Some older discussions from User talk:ALE![edit]

Argentine coat of arms[edit]

I tought that flags and coat of arms were freely usable in something with the goals wiki commons has. I can't believe there is an authority that doesn't allow that. There is also a specific template. But if you're sure, go ahead and please accept my "sorry" for the trouble I have caused. --Massimo Finizio 13:33, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ale![edit]

I'm the one who has uploaded [[image:Isabelperon.jpg]]. According to what is said about this image in the ENGLISH VERSION OF WIKIPEDIA (Image:Isabelperon.jpg) - Click here to access it, and also in the VERSIÓN EN ESPAÑOL/SPANISH VERSION OF WIKIPEDIA (Imagen:Isabelperon.jpg) - Click here to see it this image is in PUBLIC DOMAIN or ITS COPYRIGHT HAS EXPIRED - THIS APPLIES WORLDWIDE.
Ain't both of these statements credible? With regards, Joao Xavier 21:06, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No they are no. On the English Wikipedia there is information on th picture's source missingand on the Spanish Wikipedia only the information of the English Wikipedia was copied. Isabel is not long enough dead, so the 70 years rule after the photographer death is surely impossible. --ALE! 11:24, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No source[edit]

At User talk:Maksim you wrote that images are "no source". I simple copied the images, I do not know about their sources. I ask you, if you do not want to delete the images, ask about the sources the original uploaders in nacional wikipedies, by link at left at section "In Wikipedia". Maksim 11:27, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Córdoba Province (Argentina)[edit]

Category:Cordoba is empty because I emptied it. It contained a mix of pictures belonging to both Córdobas (in Spain and in Argentina), and it was badly named (Cordoba instead of Córdoba with an accute). —Pablo-flores 17:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About images selected for deletion[edit]

Ale you have marked some images uploaded by me for deletion. About that:

  1. File:DibujoHYrigoyen-elpeludo.jpg. This one has to be deleted. It was my mistake. Is not a photo, you're right. The owner is Ramon Colombo (RC) who died at 1959, so it will be PD on 2019.
  2. File:Voto cantado y Juan Pueblo - Caras y Carertas - 1938.jpg. Same situation that the former one.
  3. File:FORJA Cuaderno Radicalismo y nacionalismo.jpg I thought it was right. It's a photo of a book's frontpage. But studying other similar cases, I found that the frontpages are protected. Now, really I don`t know. Do what you think it's right. No problem.

Regards --Roblespepe 10:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NEW DRAWINGS FOR DELETION[edit]

Ale, you are right again. These drawings must be deleted:

  1. File:El apostol - Quirino Cristiani - 1917.jpg
  2. File:Hipólito Yrigoyen - Oleo de E Bertolé -MHN.jpg. The paintress died at 1949.

Be calm, Ale. I'm not uploading drawings anymore, without checking the specific rule for them Regards, and sorry for making you work. --Roblespepe 21:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine copyright law[edit]

I appreciate your taking your time to go through pictures of Argentina; I'd really appreciate it if you did actually read the applicable law first. Some cases, such as movie stills, are quite different from what you have been stating. Taragüí @ 11:46, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Proa y Martín Fierro[edit]

No había notado, el "NB", perdón. Averiguando quien podía ser descubrí que era "Norah Borges", quien murió en 1998, por lo que puede ser borrada directamente. En cuanto a la imagen de la revista "Martín Fierro", no pude encontrar información sobre "Fapa", así que también puede ser borrado.--Sking 15:32, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frontpage copyright[edit]

File:Constitucion 1994-La Nacion-presidencia-govar.jpg

I'm writing you about the deletion of the image of the frontpage of a newspaper. So, there is a copyright on the frontpages of the newspapers? I cannot take a picture of a frontpage in the shop? Why is that? So, go on, delete it, (i'm crying). --Roblespepe 23:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:Buenos Aires Palacio Antiguo.jpg[edit]

File:Buenos Aires Palacio Antiguo.jpg
unidentified building in Buenos Aires

Hello!

Thank you for uploading Image:Buenos Aires Palacio Antiguo.jpg

Can you please help us to identify the building and in which barrio the building is located and then remove the Category:Unidentified buildings from the descirption. Thank you! --ALE! 10:21, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not 100% sure, but I think it's from Recoleta, Palermo, or Belgrano. --Federal Corps 03:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you uploaded the images as your own work. You should know where you have taken the picture. Or have you uploaded someone elses work as your own? --ALE! 07:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the license, it's not my own work. The image was taken from an Argentine history website, but the site currently holds no copyright because it's a very old image (federal law 11723), approx. from 1900. Have a good day. --Federal Corps 21:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One picture[edit]

ALE, the "Manifiesto Liminar" is a non-author document produced by the Federación Universitaria Argentina at 1918.--Roblespepe 20:00, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
El Manifesto fue firmado por "Enrique F. Barros, Horacio Valdés, Ismael C. Bordabehere, presidentes — Gumersindo Sayago — Alfredo Castellanos — Luis M. Méndez — Jorge L. Bazante — Ceferino Garzón Maceda — Julio Molina — Carlos Suárez Pinto — Emilio R. Biagosh — Angel J. Nigro — Natalio J. Saibene — Antonio Medina Allende — Ernesto Garzón."
Asi me parece que tiene autores. --ALE! 21:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please notify uploaders[edit]

Hi ALE!, when nominating images such as Image:Entel79.jpg for deletion, please leave a note on the uploader's talk page to let them know. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did inform the uploader: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yuse70&diff=prev&oldid=1798737
Cheers --ALE! 14:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm very sorry... those little boxes don't have headings, so I didn't notice. Carry on your fine work, then :) --pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GBA[edit]

No hay problema, en toda guerra hay heridos. --Barcex 22:08, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Federal corps[edit]

No analicé todos los orígenes que puso, pero por lo que ví son fotos con derechos reservados, a las que él falsamente atribuye licencia GFDL. Es decir, no basta con haber puesto la fuente. La de PD-Old que decís, no la he visto. No creo que lo haga de mala fe como para ser bloqueado, salvo que insista subiendo más. Barcex 21:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Le escribí gentilmente y me contestó con ésta agresión: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABarcex&diff=2023675&oldid=2003528

Le voy a pedir bloqueo del usuario y creo que tenemos que pasar sus imágenes a speedy delete. Barcex 00:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Plaza de Mayo EZ.jpg[edit]

Por lo que conosco este imagen esta en el espacio RBG

Zimbres 15:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pefc-logo1.jpg[edit]

Hi ALE!, could you please handle this image? If it's a copyvio, please delete it and warn the uploader; if it's actually true, it would be good if you could put a short sentence in English and a specific link to where it says this. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted --ALE! 13:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A new tool to help with deletions: FYI[edit]

it's called "Bad Old Ones". See e.g. [1]. I created a template, {{Delete assist}} which should be put on subcats of 'Unknown'. I just put it on the month-level ones, if you want to put it on day-level ones you're welcome to. It will just automatically create the link to Bad Old Ones for that category.

It's good if you want to delete "easy" cases that aren't being used anywhere. :) There's also a 'safe delete' option which creates a backup copy on the toolserver. However Brion is working on undeletion of images at the moment and it might be fixed permanently very soon!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Orgel Nordenst.jpg[edit]

Hi ALE!, would you be able to check this image out? Somehow I don't think it's GFDL, but I can't read German. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC07026.JPG[edit]

Hallo ALE!, Ich habe gestern dieses Bild hochgeladen, aber dummerweise den Namen nicht geändert. Besteht die Möglichkeit, den Namen nachträglich zu ändern (in Glühwürmchen o.ä.)? ... der jetzige sagt ja nicht allzuviel über das Bild aus ... Gruß, --NEUROtiker 23:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

File:Sorry in progress.jpeg
Sorry... it's a board game :)

I just wanted to apologise again, I really respect and appreciate your work on this page particularly, and I was much more of a jerk than was necessary. pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Foursymbols.jpg[edit]

How do you know it's fair use? I couldn't find the en.wp page. And if you know, why don't you just delete it? ...I'm confused. pfctdayelise (translate?) 06:13, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But... where did you see it on en.wp? They might have copied it and just forgot to copy the information. So how do you know it's fair use? Or do you just guess? pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commons-l subscription[edit]

Hello ALE!/Archive 1,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 22:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Info[edit]

Check User talk:Andre Engels; add Somespeak to the list. Someone should watch RC for a while... Maybe semi-protecting the pages affected could end the fun (at least on the Commons: policy pages). Lupo 15:07, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Image Tagging Image:Trilla egipcia.png[edit]

Sorry but if this license (law 11723 in Argentina) is only valid for photos, I not have any other one for this image, you may delete it. And this other one too: Image:Agricultura egipcia.png mea culpa--Locutus Borg 09:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


One more time, thanks!, but (if I want be respectfull with the rules and if I dont want be dishonest), I not have legally reasons for save this image. Only I retouched and cleaned a little bit after scanning, maybe for this cause can cosidere a redrawn version by me. But this seemes a cheat.--Locutus Borg 13:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Estoy hablando contigo en inglés y apenas lo manejo y estoy sudando para poder expresarme, y ahora veo en tu perfil que hablas muy bien español ¿qué alivio! Veo que tienes menos ganas que yo de borrar la imagen. A ver si me explico. La imagen ha sido escaneada de un libro de 1945 que ahora mismo tengo en las manos y que dice textualemte «Copyright 1945, by Jose Montesó. Hecho el depósito que marca la ley 11.723. Es propiedad. Derechos reservados». Yo pensé que la citada ley incluía todo tipo de imágenes, por eso puse esa licencia. Ahora comprendo que no es así y creo que no es de dominio público, pues los derechos siguen vigentes.

Si no entiendes algo avísame.

Si quieres le doy algo de color, la retoco y la envejezco, imitando la original egipcia, y pongo PD-self o PD-Layout. Pero tal como está se debe borrar. Sólo siento el trabajo que te estoy dando. Para tu consuelo te diré que hay otra imagen muy parecida, no es la misma, pero representa la misma escena en Image:Maler der Grabkammer des Menna 012.jpg, por lo que los usuarios siempre tendrán otra opción. Te agradezco el interés, de veras.--Locutus Borg 15:18, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pratt & Whitney JT9D Saugkraft.jpg[edit]

Von diesem Bild, das du zum Löschen vorgeschlagen hast, gibt es eine verbesserte Version, da es in der deutschen Bilderwerkstatt bearbeitet wurde: Image:Pratt & Whitney JT9D Saugkraft-2.jpg. Ich habe dies nun auch zum Löschen vorgeschlagen. MfG--Luxo 15:02, 14 July 2006 (UTC) PS: Da mein Englisch sehr schlecht ist, schreibe ich hier deutsch :-)[reply]

Image:Marcel Janco tap.jpg[edit]

see my coment on the page. in what form i should add permision from the rubin museum?Talmoryair 09:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jerry Jones/Image:Ruth2.jpg[edit]

I saw that you'd posted a question about permissions on the talk page of User:Jerry Jones. You should be aware that this user has been banned repeatedly from En.Wikipedia, due in part to his numerous errors in uploading copyrighted images, as well as plagiarism, sockpuppetry, etc. I urge you to treat with scepticism any statements by him that he has either obtained permission or has an acknowledgement of public domain status from copyright owners or webmasters. -Will Beback 20:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some COAs[edit]

Hi ALE!... I see you tagged Image:Rustenhart.png and Image:WIWERSHEIM-blason.jpg as cc-by-nc, a deletion tag. Why don't you just delete them directly? cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In order to give someone else the chance to have a second judgement of the issue where I am not absolutly sure. The cc-by-nc license is by the Geneawiki. However, these COAs might be in the PD. --ALE! 15:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That is a good idea, but speedy tags should be reserved for images that are in fact speedy! I think for situations like this, it is better to cross out the tag and put {{subst:nld}} (it's like saying... the licensing is uncertain). What do you think? pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deletion[edit]

Hi, you deleted File:Sunbathe breasts.jpg and File:Tange-bikini bottom.jpg. You stated you found a copyright reservation on flickr. Could you provide the link? Did you ask info to the uploader of the images? I would be grateful if you could asnwer on my talkpage]. gala.martin (what?) 10:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for providing the links!! gala.martin (what?) 12:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the same set of Flickr deletions, Image:NewportBeach California USa.jpg was deleted as well. As mentioned in the deletion request discussion, should revoked licenses not be tagged with {{Flickr-change-of-license}} instead of blunt deletion? --Para 23:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And how shall we proof, that the license changed and that it was a CC license before if one of these cases go to court? That is the only relevant question. Regards --ALE! 07:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Two different users had uploaded this particular image to Commons and so had been to its Flickr page. One of them is an admin. Is this not enough to prove that the license shown on Commons was the same as on Flickr at the time of the uploads? Where should we draw the line? Whatever is done by anyone else than Flickr or the photographer, the reliability can be questioned. Commons needs a general policy on attempts to revoke licenses, considering more than just Flickr. Please participate in the discussion before doing massive deletions. --Para 12:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discusión sobre Image:Logo Honda Moto.jpg[edit]

Hola, ví que dejaste abierta la discusión sobre Image:Logo Honda Moto.jpg, en ella todos están opinando sobre si la imagen viola (o no) el copyright pero nadie debate si la imagen respeta los principios de Commons; me refiero principalmente a "Commercial use of the work must be allowed", es decir, ¿puedo yo imprimir esa foto y vender posters, tarjetas, remeras o almanaques que la incluyan?. Si el uso comercial de esa imagen es limitado entonces debería estar aclarado en su descripción para que el usuario de Commons que la utilice quede advertido. Saludos (y perdón por dejarte el mensaje aquí pero mi nivel de inglés me permite leer facilmente pero no me alcanza para escribir frases complejas). --Martin Rizzo 21:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

I haven't deleted any images (just pages/ctgr). But noted for future. Regards, --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 06:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I delete pages per Category:Deletion_requests, have not use the Commons:Deletion requests at all ;). Will be more carefull in future. Regards, --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 06:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Nicor[edit]

Hola ALE, ¿podrías mirar el mensaje que he dejado a este usuario y sus contribuciones? Creo que es alemán, enlaza las imágenes a de:wiki y quizá entienda mejor su propio idioma que el inglés. Muchas gracias. Anna 01:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad tagging[edit]

Instead of spewing on me about stamp images, you should have taken the time to look at history, wherein you would have seen some moronic anon replace a perfectly valid tag with a bogus one (while I was on a trip and not looking, going by the date). As I have over 2,500 images on commons, it's a pretty safe bet that if a bunch of my images are untagged, it's the work of vandals! Stan Shebs 06:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you should inform yourself on various common categories of images - all US stamps before 1978 are PD, for instance. Stan Shebs 06:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"It is not my task to look through the change history" - this is completely wrong, it is part of your responsibility as admin. What if a vandal blanks an image description page? Would you just delete it on the assumption that there never was any information on the image? Stan Shebs 16:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Come on and get down a little bit. The description page was not blanked by nobody but was perfectly fine with a license template and everything. The template was deleted as the result of the discussion on the deletion requests page. Consequently your stamps do not have a license any more and it is the responsability of the user to give us a new valid license.
We had stamps from Ucraine and Guam using the template, how should I now the correct license? And if found a license in the history, how should I know, that it was a valid license. Also fellow admins can fail choosing the correct license tag. --ALE! 18:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh come on - a production of the US govt? and 150 years old? and uploaded by a longtime commons admin? Why would there be any doubt whatsoever as to copyright status? You made a mistake - learn from the experience, don't try to justify it. Stan Shebs 19:53, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-stamp}}[edit]

Variants of the use of this template were described on page Commons:Stamps/Public domain. I suppose that possible was add this description to template, but not to delete. All loaded by me image of the stamps on Ukrainian Law is PD. I am a change bad template on {{PD-UA-exempt}}.

But, suppose that for image, loaded under correct license on moment of the loading, must be other criteria of the removing. Presently summer and many users on a vacation and for week can not call at on its page to add a new valid license. --Yakudza 10:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright for pictures of postage stamps[edit]

Hi ALE!:

I am having problems figuring out copyright issues for images of postage stamps from British Guiana / Guyana and seek your help figuring out the appropriate tags. Nick Taylor 15:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Artigas-flag.jpg[edit]

Perfecto, ya hice todo lo que me dijiste. Saludos, Loco085 18:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Event-Roche Doktorarbeit aus dem Jahre 1978.jpg[edit]

Kannst Du bitte die Infos noch nachtragen, die ich in der Löschdiskussion gefordert hatte? Ein ausdrücklicher Hinweis, dass wirklich der Ersteller des Plakats der Fotograf ist und noch die vollen Rechte verfügt (warum hat er es dann eigentlich nicht einfach eingescannt?) --Rtc 11:01, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LocationASEAN.png[edit]

Hallo ALE,

Vielleicht eine etwas ungewohnte Frage - warum hast du das o.g. Bild nach Listung auf den vfd-Seiten dann doch nicht gelöscht? Hier gabs keine Stimme gegen die Löschung (Astrokey hat seine Meinung geändert und Duesentrieb war wohl in die falsche Diskussion geraten). Das Bild hat zwar eine Lizenzangabe, aber es ist viel zu klein, um wirklich etwsa erkennen zu können und genutzt wird es wie gesagt nirgendwo - nur auf der indonesischen WP ist es auf irgendeiner seltsamen Seite eingebunden (Zitat: "List of images which not displayed on any article but keeped only for archive"), wo es aber der Auskunft eines Benutzers von dort auch gelöscht werden kann. Rein interessehalber fragt Rdb 07:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Attention niels epting 01.png[edit]

Hallo ALE!, kannst du bitte die Datei löschen? Siehe Template:Deletion_requests#Image:Attention_niels_epting_01.png, es sind jetzt endlich alle wikipedias, wikibooks usw. auf die svg-version umgestellt. Danke. --GeorgHH 20:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The Sphere Battery Park New York USA.jpg[edit]

Can you tell me why did you delete this Image:The Sphere Battery Park New York USA.jpg? - Rklisowski 11:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DEL[edit]

Ok. It was my first time in closing discusssions at COM:DEL, so I din't know about that. Thanks for the hint. Best regards, odder 11:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Abajolaloce.jpg[edit]

It's on ja.wikinews. It will have to be removed somehow from there or uploaded to there before it can be deleted. I don't mess with Wikinews. I did list it under speedy delete. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 16:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vollschiff Preussen.jpg[edit]

I uploaded the first image I saw that was linked at Deletion requests. I'm trying to close out some of these very old matters so that Deletion Requests isn't overburdened. Everyone's help in this matter is greatly appreciated. Thanks Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 16:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to help YOU. You posted this: "Delete In doubt we should apply the 100 years rule. Anyway, there is a good usable substitute for this image, for instance on this page: http://www.seemotive.de/html/dpreussen.htm " and it was the first stamp image I saw. I cannot comprehend why you would oppose my bureaucrat election for trying to help you get this deletion debate closed. Next time, why don't you link to the image you want to use rather than assume we know what you are talking about. Or better yet, take the initiative and upload it YOURSELF, rather than expect other people to do the work for you. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 16:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Stop shouting! (Another reason to vote in contra.) You should read the discussion and think an instant before you do something. I was talking about a German stamp being a good replacement for the photo. Not a Falkland Stamp. Besides you did not correct the description page of the image. And no, you are not helping me to close the discussion if you produce double work cross checking yours. --ALE! ¿…? 22:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly, this entire affair has made me reticent to involve myself in any deletion matter that you have involved yourself in. I uploaded an image in error, based on the information that you provided. It merited a correction, not an attack, and certainly not a vote against. Furthermore, since you had no valid reason to vote against my bureaucratship before ("human error" is not a valid reason), you are most certainly being petty by providing "Another reason" after the fact. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 11:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I changed my vote to "abstention" --ALE! ¿…? 11:55, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:040521-M-1012W-014usmc.jpg[edit]

Hast du das Bild gelöscht?--Sanandros 13:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ja. --ALE! ¿…? 13:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Und warum hast du es gelöscht?--Sanandros 14:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please check this[edit]

Hi. I closed the template:Deletion requests#All pictures of DKM Bismarck, but user:Wiggum reopened it. Could you please check if it isn't better to close the debate, then to debate the same issue in two places? Thanks.

Fred Chess 16:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was out of office for some days. I will have a look on it, if it is still open. --ALE! ¿…? 10:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I found that Bastique closed it on August 29th. Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2006/07#All_pictures_of_DKM_Bismarck. thx anyways-- Fred Chess 14:29, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests[edit]

I think your archiving experience will be much easier now on. You might want to work on Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2006/09 --Cool out 04:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin news[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Concordia[edit]

ALE! En la descripción de la imagen dice claramente "Imagen tomada por Federico Corral aka Shant", que soy yo. No es suficiente?--Shant 14:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ufff! Perdón, era un mensaje viejo que me habías dejado hace tiempo, como no entro seguido a commons, no me acordaba. saludos y disculpá la molestia--Shant 19:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Elvis grave.jpg[edit]

You are welcome to keep the image on Commons. I just did not think it was necessary to have three images of the virtually same thing? Image:Elvis' tomb.jpg and Image:ElvisBurialSite.jpg are much better. -Regards [[User:Nv8200p|Nv8200p]] 02:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrato de Eva Perón[edit]

No entiendo nada de todo lo que me has puesto, pero el caso es que está claro que no es una foto, pero sí un retrato público (en esa época todavía no hacían tantas fotos como hoy), y no es un cuadro de autor, debería haber marcado la licencia esa de que es un cuadro de hace muchos años. Vamos, más de 50, pues Evita murió en 1952 y no sé cómo se cambia la licencia. --Hinzel 20:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arriba te he puesto el "template" de bienvenida. Sería buena idea de leer todo los artículos allí antes de subir algun imagen. Bueno te comiento: El derecho del autor de pinturas, esculpturas, etc. tiene el artista que las pintó o que las hacía. Una foto de una pintura no te da derchos sobre la pintura que has sacado. Una pintura entra en el dominio público 70 anos despúes de la muerte del artista. Como Evita ha muerto menos de 70 ano atras, el derecho del autor del artista que la ha pintado existe todavia. Por ende la imagen de la pintura es una violación del derecho del autor del artista que pintó a Evita. --ALE! ¿…? 09:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Digo yo, pero si el autor es anónimo ¿también está sujeto a esa ley?, porque cuadros como este de Evita creo que hacían un montón, aunque puede que si que tenga autor conocido, ya no lo sé, me has hecho dudar. Digo yo, entonces hasta que pasen 70 años desde que se pintó un cuadro ¿no se puede poner en Wikipedia?. --Hinzel 04:16, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
P.D. con contestar en mi página me entero ;) Un saludo. --Hinzel 04:16, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham del Pozo[edit]

Hello

You said me :

The "Abraham del Pozo discussion" was closed, see: Template:Deletion_requests/Older_Discussion please tag one of the two versions with {{duplicate}} --ALE! ¿…? 15:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

But I can't find the result and the vote. Where is it, please ?


François Haffner ✉ 08:59, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Nazi Copyrights[edit]

Re [2], I wouldn't be surprized if under U.S. federal law it would be illegal or even criminal to honor Nazi, Al-Qaeda, and Viet Cong copyrights... Crzrussian 20:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin news[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)[reply]


Deleting outdated images[edit]

Hi ALE!

I have uploaded some illustrations, which have been outdated, due to better illustrations.

This Illustration has been replaced by .svg file:

Would you please delete these .png and .jpg files ? They have no usage. --Necessary Evil 16:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, ALE! Necessary Evil 23:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Löschanträge abarbeiten[edit]

Hallo ALE!, ich habe die Bilder von Commons:Deletion requests/Older Discussions#BVerfG pictures gelöscht, nun ist mir aber unklar, wie ich die Discussion mit {{Delh}} bzw. {{Delf}} markiere. Kannst du mir da bitte helfen? --GeorgHH 14:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Das {{Delh}} wird hinterher im Quelltext nicht angezeigt.... Danke für deine Hilfe! --GeorgHH 14:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of deleted articles[edit]

Hi, you've deleted some images related to the city of Stara Zagora recently ( StateOpera, Стара Загора, Stara Zagora map, Стара Загора карта, Stara Zagora, Stara Zagora night, Стара Загора хали, Стара Загора Античен форум, Stara Zagora 50 years ago, Stara Zagora City ).

The author considers them vital for his home city article on bg.wiki and have re-uploaded them again. After tagging for speedy delete he is guarding them as a lion ([3]). He was already accusing me in hating his beloved city during the edit war this summer, so I really do not know how to resolve the case amicably. Could you advise. Greetings, Zlatko + (talk) 08:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked the user for one week. --ALE! ¿…? 09:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures uploaded possess license us free published in the public space. They correspond to GPL General Public License / GNU Free Documentation License. Some of the photos are taken by me. In my second uploading I mentioned the sours of the pictures and thus they are illegally deleted. I am waiting for your comment for this misunderstanding before upload them again.--Crawer 18:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The photos are taken from: http://www.chambers.com under GNU General Public License / GNU Free Documentation License as stated on the site. --Crawer 20:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Unfortunately the case is not over. I've described the issue at Admin's noticeboard but just have seen you visiting bg.wiki.

Spending a lot of time on the Stara Zagora turmoil, I've got familiar with chambersZ.com. The license there is GFDL indeed but with a logical disclaimer that all external content may have own license. So the disclaimer is GFDL unless noted otherwise. Without link to the exact source (which I doubt even exists) we cannot verify whether it is GFDL. Obviously the "GFDL-OpenGeoDB" template is bogus. For me (given the inconsistency in tagging and explanations) the other PD-self and GFDL-self are bogus too. -- Zlatko + (talk) 11:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fernando Vallejo.jpg[edit]

Hallo ALE, kannst du dir bei dem Bild bitte einmal die Angaben zur Lizenz anschauen, die dürften in spanisch sein, und so kann ich nicht überprüfen welcher Baustein da rein gehört. --GeorgHH 18:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

w40k[edit]

I've removed copyvio template from figures because not all wikipedias agree, that they are copyvios (eg. pl.wiki) and if they have this template they will be deleted without unlinking, as other copyvios. For me it's stupidity, couse some wikipedias would like to move them back to have such photos...

--WarX 12:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Commons:Deletion requests/All contributions of User:Lillolollo[edit]

I've confirmed that the images were released under {{Attribution}}. See my comments on that page for details. Alphax (talk) 00:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Spee.JPG[edit]

I'v got Warnung on de. - Mit diesem Namen existiert bereits eine Datei auf Wikimedia Commons. Bitte gehe zurück und lade deine Datei unter einem anderen Namen hoch. We must delete image here first, and than send it at de. --Pokrajac 00:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ALE!/Archive_1&oldid=3512814"