User talk:ALE!

---

Older discussions can be found at User talk:ALE!/Archive 1, User talk:ALE!/Archive2-2007, User talk:ALE!/Archive3-2007, User talk:ALE!/Archive1-2008 and at User talk:ALE!/Archive1-2009 (newest)

---

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:ALE!/Archive1-2009. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Commons maintenance announcements [+/−]

More translations are needed for:

• Commons:Project scope (Sept 2008)
• Commons:Fan art (April 2009)
• Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator#User interface texts (August 2009)
• Commons:File renaming (October 2009)
• Commons:Nudity

---

Backlogs:

as of 18 February 2010

• Old deletion requests are still opened.
• Many files moved to Commons requiring review.
• Too many unprocessed files without source.
• Many files are OTRS pending for too long.
• There are 128 requested merges.
• The Vandalismpatrol has over 1190238 unpatrolled anonymous edits.

---

De-adminship

Hi ALE! This is just to inform you that yesterday night, you had your adminship privileges revoked on Meta by a Wikimedia steward; as you are an experienced editor, I gave you the autopatroller rights instead. Thank you for you service as an administrator, and I hope you will, one day, come back to us. Of course, please do feel free to re-apply for adminship when this happens :-) Thanks again! odder (talk) 10:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Odder! Unfortunately, I do not have any more time for being an admin. At least I made it up to place 27 of the admins by date list. I'm not lost to Commons nor Wikipedia just much less active. --ALE! ¿…? 18:19, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:ECLAC

ECLAC has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 20:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Rio_Negro

Rio Negro has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Josh (talk) 18:44, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

See page UNLP

Correct it if you want with editor.38.242.7.251 17:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Flag of Chaco province in Argentina.gif

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Chaco province in Argentina.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Flag of Chaco province in Argentina.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Fma12 (talk) 00:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)