User talk:Capricorn4049
File tagging File:Panorama Piz Grisch.jpg[edit]
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Panorama Piz Grisch.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Saibo (Δ) 23:06, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Capricorn4049, kannst du mir sagen, wie du an das Bild gekommen bist? Ich sehe keinen Download-Knopf auf der Seite. Somit kann man auch nicht prüfen, was dort in der EXIF-Info steht. Dank dir! Ein atemberaubendes Foto! :-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:07, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Nur Geduld... Email ist unterwegs!--Capricorn4049 (talk) 23:14, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Besten Dank! :-) Geduld ist da - kein Problem. Bitte verwende das OTRS pending (oder besser:
{{subst:OP}}) bei zukünftigen Dateien einfach schon direkt beim Hochladen, das spart den Kontrollierern neuer Dateien Arbeit. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 03:41, 12 October 2011 (UTC)- Mach ich beim nächsten Mal ;-)--Capricorn4049 (talk) 13:24, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Besten Dank! :-) Geduld ist da - kein Problem. Bitte verwende das OTRS pending (oder besser:
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haldensteiner Calanda Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz digl Gurschus Panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tschima da Flix Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Kesch Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zervreilahorn Panorama Hochauflösend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Beverin Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Beverin Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Polaschin as seen from Crap da Sass 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Polaschin as seen from Crap da Sass 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Polaschin as seen from Crap da Sass 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Forbesch Panorama Sehr Hochauflösend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png){kind=small}
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Grevasalvas Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hallo Capricorn4049, du kannst auf Schöpfungshöhe plädieren, aber auf own work? Ich halte das Logo allerdings für geschützt und ausreichend schöpfungshoch. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:05, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ist nach de:Datei:Logo of Valser water.JPG verschoben worden.--Capricorn4049 (talk) 17:13, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]
Hi Capricorn4049, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:
- Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
- Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
- Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
Natuur12 (talk) 18:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
File:1946 Chevrolet AK Series truck (Orange Julep).jpg[edit]
Hallo!
(Sorry, my German is too "rusty" to be understandable 
)
Thanks for your thanks. But I just suggested the renaming and you did the whole work. So you deserve the thanks for it 
Beste Grüße
BarnCas (talk) 21:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Mon français est aussi un peu rouillé... Au contraire, je n’ai presque aucune idee des modèles des voitures. Sans ta connaissance je n’aurai pas pu faire le travail. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 22:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Dann war es eine gute Zusammenarbeit
BarnCas (talk) 23:01, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Dann war es eine gute Zusammenarbeit
File:Opera 11.2Comelico.jpg[edit]
Hello, just do it like this: File:Opera 11.2 Passo Monte Croce di Comelico.jpg. Thank --Llorenzi (talk) 16:01, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Renaming Fiat Ute pick[edit]
Thank you for renaming the picture of the little white Fiat truck in the Netherlands. Regards Charles01 (talk) 15:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, you're welcome--Capricorn4049 (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Renaming of File:Lupinus_Stradch.jpg[edit]
Concerning this edit you made, while I do not oppose it, please be aware that it does not follow, as stated, File renaming criterion #6. -- Tuválkin ✉ 02:20, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well, you are right. User:Mykola Swarnyk seemed to me to be the author. I renamed it because of File renaming criterion #1. However, it does also not follows criterion #1 as Mykola Swarnyk is not the uploader... So i thought to let the criterion as choosen from the author.--Capricorn4049 (talk) 02:38, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- He is the author, yes, and he’s not very experienced in Commons, so I guess he chose #6 by mistake. While #1 does not cover for author renaming requests 3 weeks after upload (as opposed to uploader’s request a few hours after upload), I think you would have been better to accept it under #1, its “spirit”, if not its wording, or refuse it. Filenames, after all, are a matter of stability and uniqueness, not of title. But all’s well, now. -- Tuválkin ✉ 04:13, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Shorts veria1415ho.png[edit]
Hello Capricorn and sorry for the late reply. Thank you for taking the time and checking my request. Well, I wish to let it be as it is. Since I've reupload the file there's no reason to rename it, if you wish you can delete the file that I've asked to be renamed too. Thanks in advance! --PanosBonJovi (talk) 10:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Why did you move the file above after it was declined? The file is a copyright violation, so renaming the file was a waste of time. Also, it violates the file naming policy; quote Files with copyright issues should NOT be renamed until copyright issues are resolved. There is no reason to rename a file if it is going to be deleted on copyright grounds. Please don't do anything like this again. 1989 17:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- I know the file naming policy. Look at the history!! I renamed it 12 seconds after you removed the template and added copyvio!! I just didn't see your edits because we did the edits at the same time! --Capricorn4049 (talk) 17:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Verkehrszeichen[edit]
Bitte vorschnelle Verschübe meiner Verkehrszeichen überdenken! Erst mal schauen, wer das beantragt (zuletzt eine IP mit insgesamt nur 4 Beiträgen - und die war sich beim Verschub nicht mal sicher (Zitat: "as far as I can see"). Meine Angaben zu den VZ sind Hieb- und Stichfest. Der Verschub des VZ Zeichen 244 - Gemeinsamer Fuß- und Radweg - 2, StVO 1970.svg ([[1]]) war in diesem Sinne falsch. Allein die Logik besagt, das die Variante eines VZ nummerntechnisch nicht VOR dem eigentlichen VZ stehen kann. Die Nummern der VZ haben sich über die vielen Jahrzehnte oft geändert. Daher bin ich ja der Meinung, daß die Benamung der VZ auf Commons genau sein muß und den Hinweis auf die jeweilige StVO beinhalten muß. Auch wenn das wenige hier für unsinnig halten. Aber der Blick auf über 100 Jahre StVOs gibt mir recht. Mediatus (talk) 13:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Eine IP ist nicht weniger Wert als sonst jemand
- Ich habe es geprüft, wie jede meiner Bearbeitungen, und bin zum selben Schluss gekommen
- Und falls es dieses Mal falsch war: Die Welt wird es sehr wahrscheinlich überleben. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 10:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet?[edit]
I notice that User:GEOGOZZ has created a user page, User:Lostcitymeteor, which appears to be connected to a string of meteorite postings that he/she has made, among other pictures that appear to be family pictures. Perhaps you or some other knowledgable administrator could see what's going on. Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 18:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi HopsonRoad. I also noticed that GEOGOZZ created the user page for Lostcitymeteor, and I was also confused about this action. However, I'm not an administrator and can do nothing in this case. Greets to Vermont--Capricorn4049 (talk) 00:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, This filemove request was declined by @Marcus Cyron: . I am wondering why you fulfilled it? Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:08, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- We already have a talk about the request at my talk page. DerHexer want to have his Name in the title, because of finding easier reused images. So a simple renaming is not god. Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Naja, die Umbenennung war ganz klar gemäss der Regel #2: "To change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image displays", was der alte Name ganz klar nicht tat. Daher ist jetzt der Name ganz klar besser. by Stepro ist ja auch noch Teil des Namens, darum ging es ja bei der ersten Ablehnung von Marcus Cyron. Ok, jetzt fehlen vielleicht ein paar kryptische Zahlen, die nur dem Photographen was sagen, das ist vielleicht ungeschickt. Aber es ist ja auch kein Beinbruch das Bild nochmals umzubennennen, wenn das dem Photographen wichtig ist.--Capricorn4049 (talk) 00:29, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Miss Harriet[edit]
Yes, I am absolutely sure about it because I misplaced the illustration as a result of the mistake with another one from the same collection. Please see my later changes in description. Thank you for your swift move and pardon my fault. - Cyborian
Hi, Capricorn. This is the correct name of the file, v_d_Cestari (=via dei Cestari) (just renamed at my request from File:Pigna - pal Maffei-Marescotti esterno su v d Pigna 1240747.JPG. If the filename is *.jpg or *.JPG is entirely unimportant :) Thanks. --Lalupa (talk) 14:52, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ti ringrazio per la risposta. Solo ora ho notato che Wieralee ha dimenticato di rimuovere il template "rename" dopo aver spostato il file. Ad ogni modo Jean11 lo ha rimosso declinando la richiesta. Grazie ancora e mi scuso per il disturbo.--Capricorn4049 (talk) 22:02, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Figurati. E' sempre un piacere constatare che la sorveglianza su Commons è fatta da umani :). Buona estate! --Lalupa (talk) 08:29, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Jeepomotive[edit]
I was wondering if you can give me a single cite of "jeepomotive" in German that is not recent and directly or indirectly derived from the german wikipedia? This is not a word, but a pun "discovered" by a de.wikipedia editor. Anmccaff (talk) 16:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
(cur | prev) 14:51, 14 August 2015 Capricorn4049 (talk | contribs) . . (1,561 bytes) (-136) . . (rename request declined: does not comply with renaming guidelines But it was called like this (see http://ecommons.udayton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1071&context=dayton_mag)) (undo | thank)
No, that is a a pun, and example of word-play, and it refers to a different machine, almost two years later, in a different place. This is neither an English nor a German word. Anmccaff (talk) 16:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'm fairly sure that the word was not invented by a wikipedia-editor as I found the word in the references cited on de:Jeepomotive which ar much older than wikipedia, for example here (from 3. September 1945), here (from January 1945) and here. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 16:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Again, that goes back to a single journalistic pun, not an actual word. Anmccaff (talk) 16:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- On another subject; are US pictures from an Australian site necessarily PD overall? That is, does Wiki take the least restrictive country, or the original author? Anmccaff (talk) 03:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Again, that goes back to a single journalistic pun, not an actual word. Anmccaff (talk) 16:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Administrator's noticeboard discussion[edit]
Your thoughts are welcome at an administrator's noticeboard discussion on the renaming of File:La division de la Gaule en 511-es.svg.[2] Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:56, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Entschuldigung und Bitte[edit]
Sehr geehrter Kollege, ich entschuldige mich sehr viel für meine inkorrekte Editierung von Bildern „Dub ve Dvorečku (1).jpg, „Dub ve Dvorečku (2).jpg“, „Dub ve Dvorečku (3).jpg“ und „Dub ve Dvorečku (4).jpg“. Die erste Editierung war in Ordnung, aber dann habe meine Anforderung für Editierung beantragt. Leider, erst danach (nach meiner Bitte um Umbenennung) habe ich festgestellt, dass die erste Editierung korrekt war. Es tut mir sehr leid, dass ich Ihnen die Arbeit gemacht habe. Noch einmal bitte ich Sie um Entschuldigung. Wenn möglich ist, alles zurückzustellen, bitte ich Sie darum. Ich habe nämlich Angst, dass ich wieder einen Fehler durchführen könnte, wenn ich dieses selbst mache. Vielen Dank im Voraus, mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Lubor Ferenc (talk) 00:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo Lubor Ference. Kein Problem, Fehler passieren. Ich verstehe jetzt aber nicht genau, was ich tun soll. Ich finde die oben erwähnten Dateien nicht. Die einzige Datei, die ich auf dein Wunsch hin unbenannt habe war File:Dub letní ve Chlumečku (4).jpg. Aber was soll ich damit tun?
- Hi Lubor Ference. No problem, mistakes can happen. However, I don't really understand what you are asking me to do. I can not find the above-mentioned files. The only file that I've renamed on your request was File:Dub letní ve Chlumečku (4).jpg. But what are you asking me to do with it? --Capricorn4049 (talk) 10:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hallo Capricorn4049, ich danke Ihnen für blitzschnelle Antwort. Jetzt ist alles in Ordnung und korrekt, mit freundlichen Grüßen --Lubor Ferenc (talk) 22:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Again. I was wondering if you could do me another favour at all? I requested a move of the image above to A noblewoman identified as either Mademoiselle de Nantes or the Duchess of Maine depicted as Cleopatra by François de Troy.jpg. Purely as it is identified as one of two women (sisters-in-laws in fact) And thought that would be worth mentioning in the title, as well as the name of the artist. Would you mind moving it at all? If so thank you! Simplegoose (talk) 21:50, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, me again. The only reason I suggested having "Duchess of Maine" and "Mademoiselle de Nantes" in the title were just so it is just easier to see it at a glance rather than writing a small essay in the image description below. That was all. If that makes sense? Simplegoose (talk) 19:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Miniatura di Maria Teresa Luisa di Savoia-Carignano, principessa di lamballe, 1770-80 ca..JPG[edit]
Nooooooooooo, I didn't ask to rename the image because it's Italian, it was because her name was Maria Luisa Teresa. The names are the wrong way round that was all. Look at her signature, it says M L T de Savoye. (Just thought I'd explain. Simplegoose (talk) 09:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_54#Incorrect renaming of files? --Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:13, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Seriously?[edit]
"Neutrality of description should be aimed at wherever possible, and in any event neither filenames nor text may be phrased in such a way as to constitute vandalism, attack or deliberate provocation." Calling a head of state a "beefcake" in a filename is not only a poor description, it's also ridiculous. --Brustopher (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your post. Beefcake is a compliment and not an offense. The name is also not vandalism, not an attack and not a provocation. Please notice that in general, Commons aims to provide stable file names as there might be external file clients and file moving involves significant human and computing resources. Thus renaming should be used with caution. For these reasons, the filename is (for me) ok for commons and should not be renamed.--Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- I never said it was offensive, just that it's ridiculous and doesn't keep to Commons NPOV policy. A complimenting description is still a POV, and also inappropriate in this sort of scenario. Could you imagine a photo of Angela Merkel in a bikini being kept on Commons with the file name "Boobalicious Babe Angela Merkel.jpg?" This is a similar situation. Is there anywhere I can go for a second opinion on this? --Brustopher (talk) 23:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Älplihorn Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion[edit]
du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Rätoromanisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast. Die Seite Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:
Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: mittel.
Deine Hilfe wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons als wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft fungiert.
Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.
Vielen Dank,
die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons, 15:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)File:Amtlicher Hammer.JPG[edit]
The request was based on criterium #3, to wit, "misidentified objects". The hammer in question is not a "civil-service hammer", but a sledge-hammer ("Vorschlaghammer"). I may have made the mistake of trying to conserve the pun. My apologies for that. Regards, Kleuske (talk) 13:07, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo @Kleuske: . Danke für die Nachricht. Was sollen wir jetzt mit dem Hammer machen? Ich habe vor allem abgelehnt weil dein Vorschlag (ehrenambtlich) kein Wort ist (oder war ehrenamtlich gemeint?). Und ein Vorschlaghammer ist es ja auch nicht wirklich. Vorschlaghammer sind doch viel grösser (nach DIN-Norm 1042 müssen sie grösser als 5 kg sein). --Capricorn4049 (talk) 15:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Das hätte, naturlich, ehrenamtlich sein mussen. Rechtschreibfehler sind übrigens kein teil der "renaming guidelines" und könnten einfach corrigiert werden wenn jemand sich die muhe gibt in eine fremdsprache zu schreiben. Selbst hab ich an "moker" (Niederländisch) gedacht, was mit "Vorschlaghammer" übersetzt wird[3], ein, so sagt mir der Duden, "großer, schwerer Hammer" (ohne referenz auf DIN-normierung). Ein "amtlicher Hammer" ist es aber bestimmt nicht. Dann eben nur "grosser hammer" oder, kurz und Niederländisch, "moker", was zutreffend und befreit von DIN-normierung ist. Kleuske (talk) 12:34, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ich hätte korrigiert, wenn ich verstanden hätte was du mit "ehrenamtlich" meinst, das ist mir jedoch jetzt noch nicht klar. Und ein Vorschlaghammer ist es ja auch nicht, damit hätte ich alles abändern müssen. Da fand ich es vernünftiger abzulehnen statt selber ein Wort zu erfinden, weil es hätte ja sein können, dass das was du vorgeschlagen hast (oder wenigstens ein Teil davon) Sinn gemacht hätte. In dem Fall war es offenbar nicht so, und ich habe es jetzt nach eigenem Ermessen umbenannt.--Capricorn4049 (talk) 12:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Das hätte, naturlich, ehrenamtlich sein mussen. Rechtschreibfehler sind übrigens kein teil der "renaming guidelines" und könnten einfach corrigiert werden wenn jemand sich die muhe gibt in eine fremdsprache zu schreiben. Selbst hab ich an "moker" (Niederländisch) gedacht, was mit "Vorschlaghammer" übersetzt wird[3], ein, so sagt mir der Duden, "großer, schwerer Hammer" (ohne referenz auf DIN-normierung). Ein "amtlicher Hammer" ist es aber bestimmt nicht. Dann eben nur "grosser hammer" oder, kurz und Niederländisch, "moker", was zutreffend und befreit von DIN-normierung ist. Kleuske (talk) 12:34, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n[edit]
du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Rätoromanisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast. Die Seite Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:
Deine Hilfe wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons als wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft fungiert.
Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.
Vielen Dank,
die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons, 20:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Picture of the Year/2015[edit]
du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Rätoromanisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast. Die Seite Commons:Picture of the Year/2015 ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:
Deine Hilfe wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons als wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft fungiert.
Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.
Vielen Dank,
die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons, 05:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads[edit]
du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Rätoromanisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast. Die Seite Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:
Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: mittel.
Deine Hilfe wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons als wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft fungiert.
Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.
Vielen Dank,
die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons, 15:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)About Odawara Line logo[edit]
I just don't understand why that new name is just "a bit better". Harmonizing the name of different files so that only a part of the filename differs is an "undoubted reason" for renaming. Please check the category of that file and my recent file renaming requests. owennson（Meeting Room聊天室、Certificates獎座櫃） 17:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
How to delete picture ?[edit]
How to delete picture ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keftaa (talk • contribs) 06:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Keftaa. You can not delete File:DJ Shalom.jpeg as it is used in the english wikipedia (read Commons:Deletion_policy#Reasons for deletion). If you want to try it anyway, read Commons:Deletion_policy#Regular_deletion how to do it. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 18:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Panoramics[edit]
Hi Capricorn4049. It seems that your template (User:Capricorn4049/panoramas) is causing some problems because it's adding a lot of your photos to a category that is only for 360 degree panoramics, and most of your images that have this template are not even panoramics at all (some are just regular rectilinear images), especially not 360 panoramics, which need to completely wrap around 360 degrees. Are you able to fix this? Diliff (talk) 11:29, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- I removed the category.--Capricorn4049 (talk) 14:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. Diliff (talk) 10:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Are you sure?[edit]
File:Campanile della Chiesa Santa Maria.jpg rename request declined: does not comply with renaming guidelines... do you have a rough idea how many churches there are in Italy dedicated to Mary the mother of Jesus, and consequently there are many church towers? Category:Saint Mary churches in Italy, Have a nice trip!... you still feel that it is not necessary to specify which bell/church tower it in filename?--Threecharlie (talk) 15:28, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Threecharlie. Please stay polite and check your reason for the request (File renaming criterion #3). There was no obvious error in the file name like misspelled proper nouns, incorrect dates, and misidentified objects!--Capricorn4049 (talk) 16:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I was adding Polish description when I noticed that there is {{Derived from|Weissfluhjoch Panorama winter labeled.tif|display=500}} in the source field. I believe it's a mistake. --jdx Re: 23:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Jdx. Thank you very much for adding polish description. The picture File:Weissfluhjoch Panorama winter labeled.tif was used at the end of the film, thus the code is not an error. Thank you. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 16:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Snowcrystals and snowflakes in heraldry[edit]
Can you please distinguish between snow crystals and snowflakes in heraldry and recategorise those coats of arms in Category:Snowflakes in heraldry appropriately. As i can see there is no difference. See also en:Snowflake (heraldry) --Smooth O (talk) 13:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
File:From Preda to Bergün with Rhaetian Railway, aerial video.webm[edit]
Hi, I thought you might like to know that I've tagged your video, File:From Preda to Bergün with Rhaetian Railway, aerial video.webm, as Media of the Day for 13 June 2017. Seagull123 (talk) 17:49, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi and thank you very much for the notification and for tagging the video.--Capricorn4049 (talk) 19:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Swiss butterfly[edit]
Hi, in case you are interested, this guy is called Parnassius phoebus (also Parnassius sacerdos depending on sources). --LamBoet (talk) 17:25, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Indeed, I'm very interested. Thank you. I renamed and catagorized it now. Thank you very much.--Capricorn4049 (talk) 17:45, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Forbesch Panorama, extrem Hochauflösend und beschriftet.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
,_aerial_photography_4.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Swiss Camp on the Greenlandic Ice Sheet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Summit Camp on the Greenlandic Ice Sheet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Landwasser Viaduct from northeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stugl.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Summit cross of Piz Platta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Motta Vallac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama from Piz Forbesch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
.jpg){kind=link}
,_by_Stepro.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_244_-_Gemeinsamer_Fuß-_und_Radweg_-_2,_StVO_1970.svg){kind=link}
,_by_Stepro.jpg){kind=link}
,_by_Stepro.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
,_by_Stepro.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_aerial_photography_4.jpg){kind=link}
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small}
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
.jpg){kind=link}
DJI Phantom 2 Vision+.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weissfluhjoch Panorama winter labeled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ziteil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piz Ela.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former main building of WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF on Weissfluhjoch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main building of WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF in Davos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
_2.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
_2.jpg){kind=link}
Belfort Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama from Piz Palü.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Labeled panorama from Weissfluhjoch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Nachbearbeitung von Bildern[edit]
Für das Setzen von Notizen (Bildmarkierungen) und Hinzufügen von Kategorien bin ich Dir sehr dankbar und freue mich, wenn meine Bilder Beachtung finden. Aber die von mir gewählten Dateinamen bitte ich, nicht zu verändern. Gern kannst Du diese Texte als englische Beschreibung einfügen und auch Weiterleitungen von den von Dir gewünschten Namen einrichten, doch meine Originalnamen sollen erhalten bleiben, da sie wohl überlegt sind. Grundsätzlich sollen Dateinamen nicht die Beschreibung ersetzen und allzu lange Namen haben auch Nachteile in Übersichten. Einen frohen Sonntag wünscht --Friedo (talk) 07:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
_2.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
_2.jpg){kind=link}
Juliertheatre on the Julierpass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion[edit]
| ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Landwasserviadukt, aerial video.webm, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Landwasserviadukt, aerial video.webm has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
declining filenames[edit]
First, I'm not sure why you declined the move for File:Jacob Vollrath 600x420jpg.jpg - first, it had an extension in the filename (jpg.jpg) and there was no reason for the dimensions to be included in the filename, since there is no identical photo with different dimensions. Additionally, it was not 600x420 but 420x600 (graphic industry standards are width x height). So this easily fell under non-controversial maintenance.
Second, File:Aperschnalzen.jpg. Aperschnalzen is competitive activity done in Austria. The request to change it to File:Aperschnalzen - Loig bei Salzburg.jpg to add the location ("Loig near Salzburg") was a good one, under Criteria #2 (change from ambiguous) and #4 (harmonize files - activity + location), so I'm not sure why you declined it claiming it did not comply with renaming standards. I moved both of these. Just FYI. Wikimandia (talk) 23:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Only fixing the double extensions is a Non-controversial maintenance and bug fix, the rest for sure not (no invalid or incorrect extensions, no character handling problems, and no other similar technical issues). However, I really don't care if and why you rename files or not, if I rename files I do it according to Commons:File renaming.Capricorn4049 (talk) 00:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
| ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Solis Viaduct, Schinschlucht and Solis dam, aerial video.webm, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Solis Viaduct, Schinschlucht and Solis dam, aerial video.webm has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:10, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg){kind=small}
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
.jpg){kind=link}
Bergüner Stöcke from Oberhalbstein.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
_Panorama.jpg){kind=small}
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
_Panorama.jpg){kind=link}
Panorama from Piz Alv.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Nomination in VI[edit]
@Archaeodontosaurus: Thank you for closing this nomination (and this and this), but next time please wait at least 48 hours after the last vote (see promotion rules). --Capricorn4049 (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry for the closed nomination too early. I put it back in place, it should work. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Archaeodontosaurus: No problem for me, as i was the last voter in 2 of the 3 cases, but I thought we should give other voters the chance to contradict to my vote. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 16:39, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- That's for sure, but I did not pay attention to the date. I hope that the Bot will do well otherwise I will close the appointment manually. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think the bot has a problem with it.--Capricorn4049 (talk) 17:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- That's for sure, but I did not pay attention to the date. I hope that the Bot will do well otherwise I will close the appointment manually. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Archaeodontosaurus: No problem for me, as i was the last voter in 2 of the 3 cases, but I thought we should give other voters the chance to contradict to my vote. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 16:39, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama from Usser Wissberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Grisch Panorama beschriftet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Weissfluhjoch Panorama winter labeled.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weissfluhjoch Panorama winter labeled.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Leg Grevasalvas 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cairn on Büelenhorn (Davos).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama from Piz Grisch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started[edit]
|
This year is a world event.
This is a manually inserted message for the uploaders of the 2015 edition.
|
--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
|
File:Gruss-vom-Piz-Languard-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fæ (talk) 21:23, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Template:Biosphere Reserve/i18n[edit]
du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.
Die Seite Template:Biosphere Reserve/i18n ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:
Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: hoch.
Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.
Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.
Vielen Dank,
die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons, 09:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:ETH-Logo Klein.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Malo95 (talk) 09:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:Restaurant Piz Languard 1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fæ (talk) 17:36, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:Piz Languard 1905.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fæ (talk) 17:37, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Ziteil Panorama.jpg[edit]
), No derivative works (
), or All Rights Reserved (
), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as 
(CC BY), 
(CC BY-SA), 
(CC0) and 
(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.Ronhjones (Talk) 16:48, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Übersetzungsbenachrichtigung: Commons:Moving files to Commons[edit]
du erhältst diese E-Mail, da du dich als Übersetzer für Deutsch und Rätoromanisch bei Wikimedia Commons registriert hast.
Die Seite Commons:Moving files to Commons ist zum Übersetzen vorhanden. Du kannst sie hier übersetzen:
Übersetzungspriorität dieser Seite: niedrig.
Deine Hilfe bei der Übersetzung wird sehr geschätzt. Übersetzer wie du helfen dabei, dass Wikimedia Commons eine wirklich mehrsprachige Gemeinschaft ist.
Du kannst deine Einstellungen zu Benachrichtigungen ändern.
Vielen Dank,
die Übersetzungskoordinatoren von Wikimedia Commons, 09:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Category Piz Sella[edit]
I created the category Piz Sella for Gröden. Therefore I dont’t think it’s very kind of you modifying the original category while while you could create a new category for Switzerland or are we less worth than the swiss? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:51, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo @Moroder: Ich verstehe nicht ganz wieso du dich angegriffen fühlst, aber ich erkläre gerne was ich gemacht habe: Category:Piz Sella war ja mit wikidata:Q3036641 und damit mit ceb:Piz_Sella_(tumoy_sa_bukid_sa_Italya,_Lombardia), en:Piz_Sella, fr:Piz_Sella, nn:Piz_Sella und pnb:پز_سیلا verlinkt. All diese Seiten beschreiben den Piz Sella im Berninagebiet auf der Italienisch - Schweizerischen Grenze. Diese Verlinkung bestand bereits - die habe nicht ich gemacht. Darum habe ich lediglich die { {Wikidata Infobox} }, die du (wieso auch immer) entfernt hast wieder eingesetzt und ein paar Kategorien hinzugefügt. Dann habe ich Category:Piz Sella (Gröden) erstellt und mit dem (richtigen) Wikidata-Objekt wikidata:Q31644720 verlinkt, der bereits mit ceb:Piz Sella (tumoy sa bukid sa Italya, Regione Veneto) verlinkt war und den Berg in der Region Veneto beschreibt. Bei der Kategorie habe ich übrigens noch einige Informationen und Kategorien hinzugefügt, die vorher nicht dort waren. Auch das entsprechende Wikidata-Objekt habe ich noch aufdatiert. Von dem her verstehe ich nicht ganz wieso du das Gefühl hast, wieso "ihr" (wer auch immer das ist) weniger wert seid als die Schweizer (wobei der Piz Sella ja ebensoviel zu Italien gehört wie zur Schweiz). Dann habe ich noch alle Bilder, die den Berg in Gröden zeigen in dieser Kategorie verschoben und alle Bilder, die du einfach aus der Kategorie Category:Piz Sella rausgeschmissen hast (ohne sie einer anderen Kategorie zuzuordnen) wieder in die Kategorie hizugefügt.
- Also ich sehe da kein Angriff oder Unfreundlichkeit oder etwas ähnliches. Du kannst die Category:Piz Sella gerne in "Piz Stella (Bernina)" oder sonst irgend etwas anderes umbenennen, aber dann musst du unbedingt auch die Verlinkung der anderen Wikis nachziehen, sonst gibt's ein Durcheinander. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ich fühl mich nicht angegriffen. Ich habe bei der Category:Piz Sella, die ich erstellt habe, zwei Fehler richtiggestellt. Der erste war der Fehler des Pi Bot der die Kategorie dem falschen Berg zugeordnet hat, der zweite war Ihr Fehler (natürlich ungewollt) der die Bernina Bilder der falschen Kategorie zugeornet hat. Sie haben meine Korrekturen ohne mich zu informieren oder interpellieren rückgängig gemacht ( ich bin ja nicht der letzte Angekommene bei Commons) und eine andere Kategorie Piz Sella (Gröden) erstellt. Piz Sella Gröden ist weder Teil der Sella Gruppe, noch steht der Berg im Fassatal und auch nicht auf der Grenze und schon gar nicht im Veneto. Also wer bringt den hier die Sachen durcheinander? Ciao --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:21, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ich sehe das so wie Moroder. Zwei Kategorien sollen erstellt werden und die Haupcategory muss gelöscht werden ({{Disambig}}), dies ist auch von der Policy so vorgesehen. Commons Kategorien haben ja ein eigenes Schema und Wikidata ist da nur in untergeordneter hinsicht relevant. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- War mal so frei und habe es entsprechend angepasst! :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:46, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Danke, ich hoffe, die geographischen Fehler werden noch behoben --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- War mal so frei und habe es entsprechend angepasst! :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:46, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ich sehe das so wie Moroder. Zwei Kategorien sollen erstellt werden und die Haupcategory muss gelöscht werden ({{Disambig}}), dies ist auch von der Policy so vorgesehen. Commons Kategorien haben ja ein eigenes Schema und Wikidata ist da nur in untergeordneter hinsicht relevant. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ich fühl mich nicht angegriffen. Ich habe bei der Category:Piz Sella, die ich erstellt habe, zwei Fehler richtiggestellt. Der erste war der Fehler des Pi Bot der die Kategorie dem falschen Berg zugeordnet hat, der zweite war Ihr Fehler (natürlich ungewollt) der die Bernina Bilder der falschen Kategorie zugeornet hat. Sie haben meine Korrekturen ohne mich zu informieren oder interpellieren rückgängig gemacht ( ich bin ja nicht der letzte Angekommene bei Commons) und eine andere Kategorie Piz Sella (Gröden) erstellt. Piz Sella Gröden ist weder Teil der Sella Gruppe, noch steht der Berg im Fassatal und auch nicht auf der Grenze und schon gar nicht im Veneto. Also wer bringt den hier die Sachen durcheinander? Ciao --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:21, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Need your presence at Featured video candidates[edit]
|
We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates | |
| Dear Capricorn4049, Featured video candidates needs your help and you can participate by reviewing or nominating your videos for the FV tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome! -- Eatcha (Talk-Page ) 20:49, 12 May 2019 (UTC) |
Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Capricorn4049,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Capricorn4049,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Capricorn4049,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Featured video UserBox[edit]
Hi Capricorn4049,
If you wish you can use the new userbox for FV which shows
 | This user has uploaded featured media to Wikimedia Commons. |
. -- Eatcha (talk) 09:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers[edit]
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2019[edit]
Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.
If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.
If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.
Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".
If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.
Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.
Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list
Social media: 
Science&Wiki 
Science&Wiki 
Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019
Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--21:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Nüschenstock and Rüchi as seen from Muttsee.JPG[edit]
Hallo Capricorn4049 - Eine kleine Verunsicherung meinerseits. Ist es richtig, dass dieses Bild den Ober See zeigt? Mein Vorschlag zur klareren Bildbeschreibung: Nüschenstock und Rüchi mit Ober See, aufgenommen vom Muttsee, Glarus Süd, Glarus, Schweiz ? Freundlichen Gruss vom --KusiD (talk) 04:14, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo KusiD. Ja, es ist der Ober See. Gruss --Capricorn4049 (talk) 12:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
FV Promotion[edit]
|
The file File:Ziteil, aerial video.webm, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest file on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Ziteil, aerial video.webm. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
/FVCBot (talk) 17:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:Plan of Konotop XVI-XVII cc.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ZomBear (talk) 11:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Bernina Panorama beschriftet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mont Blanc Panorama beschriftet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Kesch Panorama beschriftet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Piz Forbesch, aerial video.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
|
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started[edit]
Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.
If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.
If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.
Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".
If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.
Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.
Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list
Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki 
Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021
Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--14:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Ziteil, aerial video.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
|
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 |
File:Ефремовский завод К.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Broken redirect (迷子のリダイレクト))
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : MathXplore.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 09:55, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
|
File:عمو.jpeg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect))
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Johnj1995.
And also:
- File:عمو.jpeg ( Nominator : Meno25 | Reason : Broken redirect )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 19:17, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schwarzhorn Panorama 1 Labeled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Linard Panorama Labeled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama from Piz Linard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama from Schwarzhorn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Du erhältst einen Orden![edit]
|
Der Fleißorden |
| Für die unglaublichen Bergpanoramen Ermell (talk) 21:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monte Leone Panorama Labeled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama from Piz Nair.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama from Monte Leone.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama from Sparrhorn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piz Nair Panorama Labeled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Labeled Panorama of Sulzfluh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Photographer's Barnstar |
| Danke dir vilmol für dini Fotis und din Iisatz für Wikipedia Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC) |
- Oh, wow!! Danka vielmol Paradise Chronicle für dr Barnstar und für die netta Wort. Freua mi total drüber. Ha's scho uf miner Benutzersiita igfüägt, wenn das ok isch!? --Capricorn4049 (talk) 20:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2023[edit]
Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.
If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.
If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.
If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.
Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.
Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list
Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023
Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--17:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Andacht in der Kirche Ziteil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cambrinocambrino (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Morgenessen in der Pilgerstube Ziteil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cambrinocambrino (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Bergnema[edit]
Allegra, ich han die Foti vom Panorama vo dr Alp Grüm ufaglaada (hets voll no did gha), abr i han bi dr Alp Grüm a kai Panoramatafala gfunda, im Restaurant hend si mir au nit könna helfa und so kann I au kaini Beschriftige dezuetue. Und no han I dengt dass du mir villicht e biz kasch helfa und erklera, wie me dena Berga au kann Nema ge. Jo guet, I hoff verstosch mi, sunsch kann is dir au übersetza. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Allegra Paradise Chronicle, meinsch so? (Luag d'Annotationa)--Capricorn4049 (talk) 11:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Das isch besser als was i erhofft han. Danke dir. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Morgenessen in der Pilgerstube Ziteil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
194.230.144.219 23:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
|
|
File:Andacht in der Kirche Ziteil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
194.230.144.219 23:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Map of the 1st crusade[edit]
Hi Capricorn4049,
Thank you for handling the 1st crusade maps rename request.
Would it be possible to process this one again ?
Original file names were confusing, obviously this one is not a route map (the name is the map's author's).
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 14:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you,
- Regards, --Kontributor 2K (talk) 14:51, 8 March 2024 (UTC)