User talk:Elya

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

iPodLinux[edit]

Hello Elya. Were you an iPodLinux developer in the past? I'd like to reach one of their devs. Cheers. ~pikolas [[mia diskuto]] 23:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OMG! you seem to have found one really old photo of mine ;-) No, I unfortunately I was not and I have no idea where to point you. Sorry. --Elya (talk) 05:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JarektBot (talk) 15:11, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Name[edit]

I write this in English, so other users of Commons can read it, too.

If you look in the category Silver Reed Colour PenGraph EB50 you will find that every picture has an error in the name: "Silber" instead of "Silver". Only the film is named properly. --Duschgeldrache2 (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long live Mass Rename gadget … ;-) --Elya (talk) 07:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for doing the corrections. :-) --Duschgeldrache2 (talk) 22:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request[edit]

File:Rassemblement silencieux, Mahnwache Solidarität mit Paris - Cologne-Köln -1150.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.198.224.191 00:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2016[edit]

Hallo Elya,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Otto Theater Potsdam - fake colors.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Speravir (Talk) 01:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016[edit]

Hallo Elya,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Elya, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kolumba[edit]

Hi, Seltene

Hier etwas zur Info >

Commons:Deletion requests/File:St-Kolumba-Köln-0985.JPG

Trotzdem schönen Tag, --HOWI (talk) 07:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danke Dir, das konnte man irgendwann erwarten, – aber so fallen einem die eingeschlafenen Korrespondenzen aus 2008 wieder auf die Füße. Mal sehen, ob mich das neu aufrafft, die Böhms noch mal zu kontaktieren. --Elya (talk) 08:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Code (talk) 03:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely (talk) 12:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19:13, 7 February 2005 upload of the atomium[edit]

Hello, do you still have this file? Please consider reuploading it to File:Brussels atomium underconstruction.jpg if you do and I will restore the history. It has been permanently deleted before the software update it seems. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 08:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi とある白い猫, I found some more and uploaded them, but under different names, if you want to restore the history, we can rename one, but I don't think it's necessary. Thanks for the reminder, I uploaded a couple of Belgian images recently but forgot this one. --Elya (talk) 17:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I do want to preserve the page history. Just let me know which file corresponds to it and I will process it for you. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 21:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. I moved the respective file, feel free to process further. Btw I will have to check the exif data of these files. Have the impression it's a full year wrong. But that's not your deal ;-) --Elya (talk) 05:16, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Aerial and ground excellence! Maximilian (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
This is mega late but THANK YOU for amazing hospitality and all that you guys have been doing. It has been ultra bussy here with barricades being removed, press deadlines, organizing conferences and in between trying to upload to wiki and do other places we have not been able to use TOR at all and even uploading in several activist spaces has been impossible - hope its not the testing of the Internet Switch. Best Regards!! Hambinfo Hambinfo (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship[edit]

Hi Elya,
I'm really, really sorry to be the bearer of bad news, however I am obliged to let you know that following your prolonged period of inactivity as an administrator here on Commons and under criterion #3 of our admin inactivity policy, I requested the removal of your admin privileges on this project, and the request has now been fulfilled by a Wikimedia steward through Meta.

This is particularly painful to me due to the work that we've done together in the past and the simple fact that I personally like you so much :-( As is our custom, I added you to the "autopatrolled" user group instead, but please do let me know if you would like to be given additional user rights. I notice you have moved a few files over the past six months, so if you think you could use the filemover right, just say so. Thank you for you service to this community, and I hope you will continue as a regular member and perhaps will re-apply for adminship again in the future, time permitting. Lots of love, odder (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Odder, thanks for your warm words, no worries, I cannot save the world everywhere ;-) I let you know if I need any support. --Elya (talk) 06:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi odder, I would appreciate if you could help me with the filemover permission, as I recently upload a lot of artwork systematically, and bother my preferred admin all the time with moving requests ;-) Thanks a lot, --Elya (talk) 22:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Voilà! Fertig :-) odder (talk) 07:32, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Elya (talk) 07:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Vasyl Stus Donetsk University.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

lNeverCry 02:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Abbaye de Jumièges by quadcopter -0058.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Drone photography, in January 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:54, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2017[edit]

Hallo Elya,

bald startet wieder Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland, unser Fotowettbewerb rund um das Themengebiet Naturschutz. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du wieder mitmachst.

Bilder können vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2017 eingereicht werden.

WLE Deutschland kooperiert dieses Jahr mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission (DUK). Die bestplatzierten Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten, Weltnaturerbe und UNESCO-Geoparks sollen auf http://www.unesco.de präsentiert werden.

Die allgemeinen Wünsche der Organisatoren haben sich nicht geändert: Schutzgebiet oder -objekt angeben, Originalauflösung, keine Signaturen oder ähnliches im Bild.

Die Suche nach geeigneten Motiven erleichtern unter anderem neue Listen aller deutschen Naturwaldreservate oder Listen der Naturdenkmale in Baden-Württemberg, im Saarland, Hessen und Brandenburg. Stöbere einfach mal bei Wikipedia, z. B. auf der Karte.

Eine Vorjury wird die Vorauswahl der Bilder übernehmen. Hier kannst Du Dich ebenfalls gerne beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) April 2017

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello Elya, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

cool, thanks. done. --Elya (talk) 16:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danke![edit]

Herzlichen Dank für eure Team-Arbeit bei den Trauerfeierlichkeiten für w:de:Joachim Meisner! Great job! --Concord (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thx! --Elya (talk) 15:31, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Historic Scotland.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:St wolfgang regensburg by hugo schmoelz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Robotriot (talk) 16:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2018[edit]

Hallo Elya,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech (talk) April 2018

Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments/toolbox has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Effeietsanders (talk) 06:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo File:Flashmob gegen Männergewalt, Köln 2016 -4384.jpg[edit]

Protesters gather outside Cologne Cathedral with a sign reading "No to violence against women"

Hello Elya/Elke,

I'm just wondering: on what date was that photo of yours actually taken? Not uploaded to Wikimedia (probably 9 Jan 2016) but taken, at a demonstration in Cologne? --Corriebertus (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Corriebertus, it was actually taken on this day, as the EXIF data shows. Sometimes I forget switching the camera time back from daylight saving time, but as this in the middle of winter, it should be the correct time – 11:53 h. It was some days after the New Year's Eve sexual assaults in Cologne and this flashmob was taking action against the sexism and also against the racism that arose after the sexual assaults from a certain political direction. Regards, --Elya (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Which surprises me. Because article en:2015–16 New Year's Eve sexual assaults in Germany#Local population mentions only one ((mostly) women's) march in Cologne over those assaults, taking place on 5 January. So you're saying they demonstrated there again on 9 January? --Corriebertus (talk) 14:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Corriebertus Yes, Elya is right. I have taken photos too on this demonstration. See Category:Flashmob gegen Männergewalt, Köln for all images taken by Elya and me. Furthermore on January 9th another rally rally "Cologne against right-wing" and January 16th rally "Syrians against sexism". Probaly there were more demonstrations but at least me was not able to document them :-( Raymond 15:13, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the extra clarity and sources. --Corriebertus (talk) 12:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tashkent metro drushbanarodov2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 11:52, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gayle tufts 20071130.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LotttiPavarottti (talk) 11:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy International Women's Day[edit]

It might not be tradition in the West, however International Women's Day (Dzień Kobiet, Women's Day) has been widely observed in Poland for generations, and it's customary to give women flowers, most commonly tulips as they signify the incoming spring. So, as we would say—best wishes on your special day Hope to see you soon! odder (talk) 14:42, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@odder, thank you, so sweet :-) In Germany, I had to buy the tulips for my colleague and me by myself today ;-) --Elya (talk) 16:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth France 2019 a commencé ![edit]

Bonjour ,

J'ai le plaisir de vous annoncer que la cinquième édition du concours Wiki Loves Earth en France est ouverte !

Le concours concernera 368 zones de toute la France, des parcs nationaux jusqu’aux réserves naturelles régionales englobant ainsi des paysages et biotopes variés.

Pendant le mois de mai, n'hésitez pas à mettre en ligne des photos de ces zones que vous auriez sur vos disques durs ou à vous rendre dans une zone concernée près de chez vous (à l'aide de la carte). Le règlement est disponible sur la page du concours.

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé de commonistes, d'acteurs de l'environnement et de photographes professionnels. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales. Vous pourrez retrouver toutes les informations détaillées sur le site du concours


P.S. : si vous ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée, Sarah Krichen WMFr (talk) 08:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV Promotion[edit]

This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:St. Lambertus (Immerather Dom) 2016.webm, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest file on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:St. Lambertus (Immerather Dom) 2016.webm. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FVCBot (talk) 06:31, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Elya,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Elya,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 – Gewinner has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:56, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Joseph, Köln-Rodenkirchen - 0152.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:17, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Joseph, Köln-Rodenkirchen - 0154.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Hildegard, Köln-Nippes, Innenraum - 0120.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, wie ich sehe, hast du auch Probleme mit Hildegard in der Au. Der reine Innenraum müsste Panoramafreiheit sein. Erfahrungsgemäß setzt sich Martin Sg. aber immer durch, dafür braucht man sich die Mühe nicht zu machen und hier was hochzuladen. --Chris06 (talk) 12:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Chris06 – Naja, Innenräume sind immer ein Risiko – ich mach schon keine Detailaufnahmen, sondern nur Gesamtaufnahmen, aber wenn er meint … einen Versuch war's wert, wenn es nicht geht, sind sie eben weg. Kein Drama, irgendwann sind sie gemeinfrei. --Elya (talk) 13:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Naja, Bilder, die nur den Innenraum zeigen, keinerlein Details, "fair use". Werde mich wieder auf Mittelalter und Neugotik usw. verlegen, passe ja schon immer auf mit Verglasungen ;) --Chris06 (talk) 13:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use gibt's ja auf Commons nicht. Aber ich bin ja auch bald mit Artikeln zu den modernen Kirchen durch ;-) dann geht's in Richtung Neugotik… Hab doch tatsächlich noch eine gefunden, die ich noch nicht auf Wikidata in meiner Liste hatte, und wo nicht ein Foto da ist (und das nicht grad am Rand von Köln und von Schaller). Die schau ich mir morgen früh mal an … Elya (talk) 14:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Der Link zur List funktioniert nicht. Welche Kirche meinst du? --Chris06 (talk) 16:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, sorry, dann so: Shortlink. Die Kirche ist in Lindenthal und möglicherweise auch bald vom Abriss bedroht, wir versuchen es morgen früh mal, da sind wir eh mit der Drohne unterwegs. Lass dich überraschen, Artikel ist in Arbeit ;-) --Elya (talk) 16:56, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Elya Du meinst diese Kirche hier? Das war jetzt Koinzidenz, wir wollten heute nämlich zu St. Stephan in Lindenthal. ;) --Chris06 (talk) 12:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Chris06 … du nun wieder, irgendwann treffen wir uns mal, ok? Wir sind noch mal zurück nach dem Mittag, da stand die Sonne noch etwas besser. Bilder kommen gleich. Leider war sie natürlich zu. Dafür war Christi Auferstehung offen und leer … --Elya (talk) 13:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Elya PS Freue mich auf den Artikel, und da die Kirche nur verpachtet ist, habe ich das originale Patrozinium für die Kategorie gewählt. --Chris06 (talk) 13:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Chris06, hab sie hochgeladen. Wenn ich mir die Daten ansehe, auch von unserem ersten Besuch heute morgen (nicht hochgeladen), dann haben wir uns diesmal um 12 Minuten verpasst ;-) --Elya (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frage[edit]

Elya Hallo, da du ja viel zu Köln machst und ich bisher nur sporadisch, mir ist heute etwas passiert, was neu für mich war. Ich wollte in der Stegerwaldsiedlung die ehemalige ev. Kirche fotografieren. Was man gar nicht erst wahrnimmt, darin befindet sich heute ein Kindergarten. Wäre auch niemals auf die Idee gekommen, Kinder zu fotografieren und dort ist außerdem eine hohe Hecke um das Gebäude. Die Kirchenarchitektur darüber erkennt man aber noch. Jedenfalls kam sofort die Leiterin und sprach mich an, das Fotografieren von Kindertagesstätten sei in Köln verboten. Schulen u.ä. wird doch in Köln ständig bei Commons hochgeladen, gibt es eine solche Regelung? LG --:Hallo (talk) 12:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Chris06, ein solches Verbot ist mir direkt nicht bekannt. Zumindest nicht auf die Architektur bezogen. Die Leiterin wird einfach Sorge gehabt haben, dass jemand Kinder (mit)fotografiert; zumindest ist die Veröffentlichung auf Grund des allgemeinen Persönlichkeitsrechts nicht erlaubt. Ich würde die Kirche nochmal an einem Wochenende besuchen, dann sind keine Kinder dort, nehme ich mal stark an. Auch bei Schulgebäude achte ich darauf, dass ich nur zu schulfrein Zeiten diese fotografiere. Raymond 12:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Raymond, so habe ich das vermutet. Wir haben uns auch keine Gedanken gemacht, weil es nicht um das Spielgelände außen hinter der Hecke ging und das Haus wegen Corona ohnehin einen geschlossenen Eindruck gemacht hat. Ich würde natürlich niemals auf die Idde kommen, Kinder zu fotografieren. Genauso achte ich in Kirchen darauf, keine Betenden oder generell andere Leute abzubilden. --Chris06 (talk) 12:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Christi auferstehung koeln innen 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to Use Your Image[edit]

Hello Elya,

I am an academic author and am interested in printing your photograph of the Germanwings 9525 memorial within my textbook. This book is used by students to learn more about the aviation industry, and it references a variety of accidents as case studies. The Germanwings accident is discussed around the importance to support pilot mental health. I see it's listed on Wikimedia Commons as a CC 4.0, but wanted to ask you if you would grant permission for it to be printed within the book. Would you please email me your response at suzanne.kearns@uwaterloo.ca? With sincere thanks.

e-mail OK --Elya (talk) 16:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

House in Curemonte[edit]

Hallo,

Thank for you participation to Wiki Loves Monuments France 2020.

Could I ask you to double check this picture: File:Maison historique à Curemonte.jpg? I think this is not the right building and as such that this photo is not eligible from WLM France. See other pictures on Category:Maison à Curemonte and on the official database. It is indeed "Fondation du patrimoine" but this foundation is a private organisation independant from the gouvernemental "monument historique" system (some building are both but this is more of an exception).

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello VIGNERON, wow, you are quick with checking ;-) I was aware that it was not in the list and I did not put it into the wrong category, however I liked the photo and thought it could be a monument because of the label – even if not in Mérimée. If not, no problem, I remove it from the contest. --Elya (talk) 12:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image coup de cœur du 16 septembre 2020 - Wiki Loves Monuments France[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 Votre photo « Église Saint-Barthélémy de Liginiac,.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 16 September 2020.

Maud-Sophie Leccia WMFr (talk)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Elya,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Permission to Use Your Photo[edit]

Dear Elya, publishing house is preparing a book including collected papers concerning medieval art. The book is a scholarly publication prepared according to guidelines of scholarly writing. In a paper concerning iconography of the capital with Annunciation in the Saint-Austeremoine church in Issoire we would like to use your photo “Chapiteau „l'Annonciation“, Église Saint-Austremoine, Issoire - 1914.jpg”. The photo is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 licence, but we would like to know whether it is possible to obtain your permission for using it in printed book. Could you please contact publishing house by writing an e-mail to irsa@irsa.com.pl? Kind regards, --Artibusethistoriae (talk) 07:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Artibusethistoriae, thanks for the request, I've sent a mail. --Elya (talk) 15:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Civility Barnstar
Спасибо за ваш вклад в Википедию. Katonoved (talk) 21:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Architekturpreis[edit]

Tolle Bilder! Danke sehr, --Nicola (talk) 14:58, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Joseph, Köln-Rodenkirchen - 0148.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Barbara Niggl Radloff, Selbstporträt, 2002, FM-2019-1-6-3-1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Köln-Seeberg[edit]

Hallo, ich habe vor einem Jahr leider den Abriss der evangelischen Kirche/Gemeindezentrum am Asternweg in Köln-Seeberg verpasst. Es wurde auch wie so oft nicht kommuniziert. Wie ich sehe, habt ihr dort wiederholt fotografiert, habt ihr das vielleicht mal mit auf einem Bild? Das Gebäude fehlt nähmlich in der Liste im Artikel des Kirchenkreises. Liebe Grüße --Chris06 (talk) 16:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chris06, hmmm … Die Schilling-Kirche (jetzt Dimitrios) hatten wir bewusst wahrgenommen, wir waren aber eigentlich auch erst letzten Winter verstärkt in Seeberg, wegen KAP-Doku. Leider auch oft zu katholische Todo-Liste ;-) Hast du mal einen Link oder ein Foto im Internet? Vielleicht macht es dann ja Klick, aber ich krieg im Moment nichts ordentliches gegoogelt. Liebe Grüße--Elya (talk) 16:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Es gibt online eher schlechte Bilder beim ev. Stadtkirchenverband, aber die Immobilienfirma hat was :) [1] und [2]. Ich habe in den letzten Jahren einige Kirchenabrisse (und die wenigen Neubauten) dokumentiert, aber das ist immer schwierig mitzubekommen. --Chris06 (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Chris06 Die Kirchen befand sich hier. Ich kann mich leider nicht daran erinnern, dass wir soweit in den Asternweg hineingegangen sind. Sehr schade :-( Raymond 17:03, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Raymond Ich hatte damals noch die Karte von Openstreetmap kopiert. Immerhin ;) --Chris06 (talk) 14:51, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Chris06 Ich könnte aus der Luftbildkarte von NRW, die unter freier Lizenz steht, noch ein Luftbild beisteuern, wenn du magst. Würde so aussehen. Wenn du ja sagst, würde ich das richtig machen und hier hochladen. Raymond 15:29, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sicher besser als Nichts, jedenfalls als Dokumentation hier bei Commons. Für die Liste im Kirchenkreis reicht das wohl leider nicht. --Chris06 (talk) 15:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Chris06 Wie hieß denn die Kirche? Damit ich sie korrekt benenne, Raymond 16:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Evangelisches Gemeindezentrum Seeberg evangelischekirche.koeln, wobei die Anschrift da mit Braunsfeldweg das heutige ev. Jugendzentrum in Seeberg meint. Das Foto ist aber noch das alte Gemeindezentrum. -- Chris06 (talk) 16:40, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Chris06 Danke. Luftbild ist nun da: File:Luftbild Evangelisches Gemeindezentrum Seeberg, Köln-Seeberg, 2019.jpg. Raymond 16:49, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Danke! --Chris06 (talk) 17:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Chris06, Hab auch noch mal geschaut, leider nichts. --Elya (talk) 17:08, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Danke euch, hätte ja sein können! Ich war sogar kurz vor dem Abriss dort in der Nähe, habe das aber leider auch verpasst. --Chris06 (talk) 17:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France ![edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 00:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Krasser Scheiß[edit]

Hallo Elya, einfach mal danke für die ganze infrastruktur, die du "damals" für WLM erstellt hast. ein haufen arbeit, die ganzen templates zu erstellen. ich schau jedes mal voller faszination in die campaigns und templates. und versteh doch nur die hälfte :-) aber jedes mal, versteh ich ein bisschen mehr. liebe grüße aus Dresden Z thomas 17:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

💚 Elya (talk) 17:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sinnersdorfer Straße[edit]

Hallo Elya, ihr habt eine Reihe von Bildern zu Roggendorf hochgeladen. Wie mir aufgefallen ist, hat sich wiederholt ein Tippfehler eingeschlichen, "Sinner(s)dorfer". Liebe Grüße --Chris06 (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber @Chris06, danke für den Hinweis – ich schwöre, ich hatte vor dem Upload nichts getrunken ;-) Hab die fehlerhaften verschoben. Elya (talk) 18:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Das denke ich doch! ;) Liebe Grüße --Chris06 (talk) 07:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Moroz 2003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FlorianH76 (talk) 23:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]