User talk:Kelson - Wikimedia Commons

Thank you for providing images to the commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a Copyright tag - images without a appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate Categories, so it can be found by others.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more Information, have a look at Commons:Licensing, Commons:criteria for inclusion and the Community Portal. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you. -- Duesentrieb 16:24, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rename Two Files[edit]

Could you rename these two files:

"Julia exp(z3) - 0.59.png" to "Julia exp(z3) - 0.621.png"

"Julia exp(z3) - 0.65.png" to "Julia exp(z3) - 0.59.png"

Thanks!

Photo avec bordure et information meta[edit]

Salut !

Je suis partout ... le titre est de sinistre mémoire, mais j'essaie !

D'habitude je télécharge des photos sans marges. Celles-ci sont un peu particulières, il se trouve que je participe à beaucoup de concours photo, en particulier dans les domaines liés à la nature, et les images encadrées sont connues hors de WP ou WL. L'araignée dans le gazania, par exemple, a collectionné pas mal de prix au niveau national et au niveau international et elle figure dans divers ouvrages et sur des sites Internet. Naturellement si l'on trouve que le cadre est gênant je l'enlèverai.

Ceci dit, tu l'auras sans doute compris, j'essaie de ne fournir que des documents d'une qualité irréprochable.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques

Désolé pour la collision historique, je n'avais même pas réalisé,... un peu trop jeune, un peu trop con.. peut-être ;-). Pour les bordures, oui, c'est inutile... et puis l'on voit moins bien finalement le coeur de la photo, ce qui est vraiment dommage dans ton cas. Encore bravo. Kelson 09:09, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People[edit]

stp, dis-moi, poukoi tu as donné (par exxample) Jules Favre à la categorie People? Schaengel89 @me 08:44, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Tout simplement parceque j'ai parceque c'est la seule que je connaisse par coeur pour les personnes ; et que je trouve les catégories pas terribles et en anglais... ;-) Kelson 13:50, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Mais pour la future, donne tes noveuaux articles dans autre categories, d'accord? Schaengel89 @me 17:56, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oui. Kelson 19:02, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Jose Maria Heredia.jpg[edit]

Hello, Kelson;

C'est pas possible pour supprimer cette image pourqoui il y'a sur les autre projêts (en:, et autres.) S'il vous plait, expliquez en français pourquoi vous souhaitez qu'il ait enlevé. Merci. Bas ^parler _voir 00:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:Bonjour, ce n'est pas le bon (le célèbre) Jose Maria Heredia. Kelson 20:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nico.JPG[edit]

Hi, you nominated this photo for deletion but did not give a reason, why? Thuresson 22:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok, done. Kelson 11:04, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jeremy bentham.jpg[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ce média risque d'être supprimé.

Merci d'avoir téléchargé Image:Jeremy bentham.jpg. Je remarque que la page « image » n'indique pas à l'heure actuelle qui a créé le contenu, donc son statut eu égard aux droits d'auteurs n'est pas clair. Si vous n'avez pas créé ce contenu vous-même, vous devez indiquer les arguments qui expliquent pourquoi l'utilisation sur Wikimedia Commons est licite (voir ci-dessous). Si vous n'avez pas créé le média vous-même, vous devez aussi spécifier où vous l'avez trouvé, par exemple il s'agira bien souvent du site internet d'où vous l'avez prélevé, et les conditions d'utilisation qui sont indiquées sur ce site.

Si le média n'a pas non plus de message indiquant sa licence, vous devez en ajouter un. Si vous avez vous-même pris la photo, enregistré le contenu sonore, le contenu vidéo, vous pouvez utiliser {{GFDL-self}} pour le distribuer sous licence GFDL. Voyez [[Commons::Messages de statut des images]] pour consulter la liste complète des messages de statut juridique que vous pouvez utiliser.

Veuillez noter que tout contenu non sourcé et non accompagné de message de statut juridique sera supprimé une semaine après leur téléchargement, comme indiqué dans le Guide de suppression. Si vous avez téléchargé d'autres médias, veuillez vérifier que vous avez pour chacun d'eux spécifié la source et le statut juridique. Vous pouvez retrouver tous vos téléchargements en utilisant cet outil. Merci.
AlNo (talk) 15:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Marieantoinette.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

Image:Marieantoinette.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Marieantoinette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

howcheng {chat} 17:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tag integration[edit]

Hello. You've been around a lot longer than I, but I reverted your change to Image:Sitta europaea wildlife 3.jpg anyway. The discussion at Template talk:Information#Copyright tags in permission field suggests that copyright templates should not be included in the {{Information}} template. I think it's rather important for us to use a standard layout on description pages, especially on featured file or files of the day. What do you think? ~MDD 46 96 17:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your created gallery pages[edit]

Thanks for creating so many gallery pages of people. Please, categorize this pages, it will help other users to find them. Thank you. --GeorgHH 20:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dirk Bach[edit]

Les fichiers média sont classés sur la base de leur catégorisation, et celle-ci ne dépend aucunement de l'usage plus ou moins important des fichiers. L'ensemble des catégories d'un même fichier font partie des propriétés de ce fichier et ne doit pas être altéré, sauf s'il est initialement inadéquat, ou dans le cadre de l'évolution normale du système de classement.

Par exemple: Je vais prochainement ajouter la catégorie Category:Irazú Volcano à cette image, ce qui permettra de supprimer les catégories Category:Costa Rica et Category:Volcanoes.

La préservation des catégories d'un fichier (même quand utilisé dans une gallerie) est la politique actuelle de Commons. --Juiced lemon 08:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

C'est marqué où qu'il faut créer une catégorie pour chaque personne en double de sa page dédiée ? Kelson 08:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Les pages dédiées sont les catégories en anglais. Les autres pages sont pour la plupart inutiles, en particulier les articles qui ne comportent qu'un faible nombre d'images ni classées, ni commentées avec un titre qui peut être dans n'importe quelle langue, ceci comprenant les langues n'utilisant pas de caractères latins. La préservation de la catégorisation des fichiers a fait l'objet de discussions récentes dans Village pump. --Juiced lemon 08:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

L'existence d'un article ET d'une catégorie sur le même sujet n'est jamais dommageable. Contrairement à l'article, la catégorie est indispensable : cela ne me dérangerait aucunement si Иосиф Виссарионович Сталин était supprimé ; par contre, nous avons besoin de Category:Stalin (actuellement mal nommée).

L'expérience montre également que les téléchargeurs d'images ont beaucoup de mal à classer correctement leurs images, tout particulièrement lorsque les catégories appropriées n'existent pas.

La catégorisation d'un article n'est pas en double de celle de sa catégorie, puisque l'article doit se rattacher à cette catégorie et ne doit pas comporter d'autre catégorisation. --Juiced lemon 09:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

L'existence d'un article ET d'une catégorie sur le même sujet n'est jamais dommageable. Contrairement à l'article, la catégorie est indispensable : argumente ?! La redondance est le souvent dommageable, nies-tu cela ? n'importe qu'elle tâche d'organisation cherche à tuer la redondance. Pourquoi la catégorie est indispensable ? Ne parlons pas des noms russes, c'est un tout autre problème, c'est clair que l'article/catégorie doit s'appeller "stalin" ; mais je vois pas le rapport avec notre problème. Revient please à Dirk Bach et explique moi pourquoi ce que tu veux faire est mieux. où sont les avantages. Kelson 09:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ce n'est pas une redondance, car articles et catégories ont des caractéristiques techniques différentes et leur utilité n'est pas vraiment comparable. La catégorie est supérieure à l'article puisqu'elle possède des caractéristiques supplémentaires, au seul désavantage de ne pas conserver l'historique en cas de renommage.

Et quoi concrètement comme caractéristique supplémentaire dans pour notre exemple ?

La catégorie est nécessaire à la gestion car elle permet de comptabiliser les fichiers média pour un même critère de classement (la catégorie). L'examen visuel de la page de catégorie permet de détecter les erreurs de classement, sauf lorsque le nombre de fichiers média est trop élevé. Par exemple, la catégorie Category:Volcanoes contient environ 200 images, ce qui est jugé excessif par la plupart des utilisateurs ; dans un tel cas, il est donc nécessaire de recatégoriser les images vers des catégories plus précises. Ce travail ordinaire de gestion serait devenu pratiquement irréalisable si ces images avaient été retirées de leur catégorie parce que présentes dans une ou plusieurs galleries.

Honmêtement savoir que l'on a 200 images de Volcans, ont s'en fout ; je peut d'ailleurs te rétorquer que tu ne sais pas combien de volcans différents sont représentés..... ce qui au font n'est pas important non plus. Je ne vois pas en quoi recategoriser 100 articles (avec 2 images par article) est plus difficile que de recategoriser 200 images... il faut que tu m'expliques. Je ne souhaite pas supprimer toutes les catégories si une image est dans une gallerie, je souhaite supprimer la catégorie correspondante à l'article dans lequel l'image est introduite dans le cas où l'article lui-même est dans la catégorie (redondance).

Il faut noter que la perte de la catégorisation d'un fichier média met fin au suivi de ce fichier. En cas d'erreur, ou si le fichier est ultérieurement supprimé de la gallerie où il se trouvait, celui-ci est perdu dans la base de données. Si le fichier n'a plus de catégories, il revient encombrer la liste des fichiers non catégorisés, jusqu'à ce qu'un utilisateur courageux vienne le remettre dans le circuit.

Mais pourquoi on le virerai l'image de Bach de la gallerie ? exactement pour les même raisons que on le virerait de sa catégorie ? C'est exactement pareil... et puis les images sont pas perdus, il a un moteur de recherche qui travaille sur la description de l'image... je comprends rien. Moi quand je cherche, j'utilise le moteur de recherche, c'est un click et plus rapide que de se promener dans les catégories. Tu crois honnêtement que les gens se baladent dans les catégories pour trouver un truc ? Ils tape se qu'ils recherchent dans la searchbox et si ils ont de la chance tombent sur la page.

De plus, pour le cas particulier des personnes, il faut rappeler que tous les noms doivent normalement être indexés dans Category:People by alphabet. Cette catégorie comporte deux listes séparées : celles des articles, et celles des sous-catégories. Étant donné que l'unicité de la langue est garantie pour les seules catégories (un article pouvant être rédigé dans n'importe quelle langue : voir ประเทศโปแลนด์ et deviner le sujet de l'article), il semblerait logique de fondre les deux listes pour n'avoir que des sous-catégories. En pratique, cela consiste à créer systématiquement une catégorie pour une personne, et à ne catégoriser que cette catégorie en fonction des données concernant la personne (dates, occupation, nationalité, etc.). Si un article existe pour cette même personne, il doit être rattaché à la catégorie correspondante, et à aucune autre. --Juiced lemon 19:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

En quoi l'unicité de la langue est garantie pour les seules catégories ? Je peux tout à fait faire des catégories en russe. Kelson 20:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

La règle est que les catégories sont en anglais. Je compte la faire respecter (avec l'aide des administrateurs et autres utilisateurs), ce qui n'est pas tout à fait le cas actuellement. Ce qui signifie que si tu crées des catégories en russe, elles devraient être supprimées. Du moins, tant qu'un espace spécial n'aura pas été prévu pour des catégories en russe. --Juiced lemon 20:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne suis pas convaincu, la pluspart des arguments donnés ne tiennent pas comme :

c'est une règle défini : tu ne m'a pas montré où c´est marqué - au contaire j'ai trouvé un passage ou c'est écrit que chacun fait comme il veut.
un poblème de langue : il n'y a aucun problème particulier aux gallery, juste que tu surveilles le cas sur les category
la recategorisation serait plus compliquée - alors que au contraire ayant plusieurs images par article, cela devrait aller plus vite.
la catégorie garantierai de ne pas perdre une image : comme ci c'était plus difficile de virer une catégorie d'une image, que une image d'une gallery
la catégorie est indispensable pour localiser une image : personne ne cherche une image par les catégorie, mais par le moteur de recherche. Si cela n'était pas le cas, cela ferait longtemps que yahoo serait le maitre de la recherche sur le web, et pas google.

D'un autre coté les avantages des galleries sont nombreux et connu, cf la page de vote.

Pour toutes ces raisons, je continuerai de virer les catégories qui me sembleront représenter un doublon. Kelson 21:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Palestrina.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Palestrina.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 07:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

languages for categories?[edit]

hello there, you had a question once on the usage of local language over English in categories. I have started a discussion page on this topic, maybe you want to drop by and give your thoughts? Commons:Language for categories. sincerely Gryffindor 12:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Emmanuel :-)[edit]

Je viens de trouver cette image, qui est manifestement un copyvio (le site source est affublé d'un gros copyright et ne cite pas lui-même ses sources et surtout, je doute que cette photo soit dans le domaine public). Si tu as plus d'infos, merci de rajouter, sinon merci d'apposer le tag {{delete}} afin qu'on puisse faire le ménage. A+ ! notafish }<';> 09:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Delphine. L'illustration vient de "Bourgogne", ouvrage collectif, éditeur MSM à Vic en Bigorre. Je n'ai toujours pas la certitude que c'est dans le PD, mais au-moins, on a une ref ;-). Kelson 08:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Galleries[edit]

Hello Kelson, when creating a gallery (e.g. Bung Hatta or Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès), please add it to appropriate categories. It will help to find the galleries. Thank you. --GeorgHH 21:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Georg, That is the second time you warn ne on this topic. After the last warning, I had have made efforts to do it correctly but relatively fast have had a conflict with an other contributor. In fact, I feel the category politics inadapted, incomplete. My opinion is that categories not very essential are : I never use them for example. So, I have decided not doing anything with categories, to keep my tranquility. Kelson 09:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Kelson,

Il ne faut pas croire que "catégoriser" soit compliqué. Voici comment je travaille : trouve par exemple l'article correspondant aux oiseaux Ailuroedus sur wikipedia francophone (dans Google, tape : site:wikipedia.org Ailuroedus crassirostris).

Ensuite, tu regardes comment le contributeur a listé cet article qui dépend de la famille des Ptilonorhynchidae : c'est sous la [[Category:Ptilonorhynchidae]]. Donc il n'y a plus qu'à copier et coller la catégorie dans la page de wikicommons.

Il se peut que cette catégorie apparaisse en rouge après sauvegarde de la page. Donc rebelote : tu remonte d'u cran dans wikipedia et tu regardes la catégorie... que tu recopies/colles dans wikicommons et ainsi de suite.

Bon courage. N'hésite pas à poser des questions dans le bistro pour que les réponses soient profitables aux autres.--Patricia.fidi 13:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Claude Lévi-Strauss[edit]

Alors, cher ami, il est très utile signer ses interventions dans Wikipedia. D'accord? Franchement parler je ne me rapelle plus de l'histoir de cet image, donc le sujet était Claude Lévi-Strauss. Il faut l'enlever, c'est si simple, et dommage fait pour Wikipedia, c'est nul! --Alexius Manfelt 10:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about Liv tyler[edit]

Hi, I notice to had submitted liv tyler image [[1]] for delete, but as you can see the image is under CC license at flicker site. Why do you think there is a problem? Assafn 14:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have more informations about the photo. : the date, the location. Liv Tyler has a costume like in LOTR. I think this picture is extracted from a DVD or something like that. Another point : the quality is very good, but the other pictures of this guy are (bad) tourist pictures... He has no idea about the copyirght laws IMHO, that's the reason he has put CC as license. Kelson 14:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Jakob henle.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jakob henle.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

Same for Image:Mueller.Joh..jpg --|EPO| 12:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that stating Wikipedia as the source is not good enough. It must be stated where the image origins from so it's copyright status can be verified. If you are unable to provide source then you should not upload. --|EPO| 13:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

problème de license[edit]

merci, j'y travail en ce moment car des utilisateurs sur wikipédia France me l'ont déjà fait remarquer. Nous essayons de trouver une solution --Jmr 22:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ac papyrus.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Ac papyrus.png has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

gildemax 16:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove such warnings from the image pages. If you disagree use the talk page or contact the user who tagged it. Removing such tags without any discussion is considered vandalism and will get you blocked pretty fast! --|EPO| 13:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Versac[edit]

The contents on http://vanb.typepad.com/versac/ is not released under GFDL. It is released under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 France License. As Commons requires images to be used commercially and modified this license is not allowed on Commons.

Due to the above I will not delete these images and review all your other uploads. If I find more copyright violations I will delete them immediately.

Read the rules very carefully or you wil be blocked! --|EPO| 13:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oups, it will add the OTRS permission. Kelson 13:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:James Dean stamp.JPG[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:James Dean stamp.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Davepape 03:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sarkozy[edit]

Merci :) Effectivement, 70mm c'est court, d'ailleurs j'ai acheté aujourd'hui un 70-300 qui, je l'espère, me facilitera la vie :) guillom 11:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tim berners-lee.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Tim berners-lee.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Note the Flickr licence allows non commercial use only. Adambro 13:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Avrillavignex.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Avrillavignex.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Cary Bass ^demandez 13:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Old map-Flatonia-1881.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Old map-Flatonia-1881.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

(An old request you made) --Deadstar 10:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:P agriculture.png[edit]

I have restored the older version, but this one does neither specify a source. I have therefore tagged it {{Nsd}}, and it will be deleted if no source can be found within 7 days. In case you want to change the picture to another picture that is sourced and freely licensed, please do so, and leave me a note so that I can delete the old versions. -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Smit.Cercopithecus L'Hoesti 1.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Smit.Cercopithecus L'Hoesti 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

(fixed your request) --Deadstar 08:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SatiebyValadon.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:SatiebyValadon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 20:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Larry wall.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Larry wall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 14:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Zürich-drapeau.svg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Zürich-drapeau.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Gorky image[edit]

I notice you uploaded Image:Maxim Gorky authographed portrait 1.jpg, using a tag that implies you are/were the copyright holder of the image. Given its age, I'm assuming that's not correct, though I'd hate to see such a nice image of Gorky deleted, so I'm not going to list it anywhere - but please update the tag so that nobody else gets it into their head to try and delete it. Sherurcij 04:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that is a corrected mistake from me. Best regards Kelson 09:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attention...[edit]

Salut, fait attention à ne pas supprimer les interliens, c.f. ce diff. Kelson 07:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, en fait, c'est presque normal :p

Je bosse actuellement sur les hommes politiques français (je refais les gallery et j'organise les cat) et j'avais viré l'interwiki (en fait, il y a 4...) pensant ajouter le sommaire après avec Sumitup mais hier le toolserver était (encore) cassé... donc j'ai reporté l'opération de quelques heures...

Je corrige tout de suite vu que le tool server est réparé... À plus--Bapti

Image Tagging Image:Tombeau_de_Bruckner.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tombeau_de_Bruckner.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Kiki Daire[edit]

Image deletion warning

Kiki Daire has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

--← Körnerbrötchen <✉> 13:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:LL_20021213.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LL_20021213.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

Image Tagging Image:AndréChénier.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AndréChénier.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

Image Tagging Image:Anne_de_Montmorency.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Anne_de_Montmorency.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

Image Tagging Image:Familistère-guise.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Familistère-guise.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

Image Tagging Image:Napoleon-3.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Napoleon-3.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

Image Tagging Image:Alexandre_Dumas.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexandre_Dumas.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

Jacques Barrot[edit]

Image deletion warning

Jacques Barrot has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

--86.94.202.45 11:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Muhammad_3.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Muhammad_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

193.188.115.248 17:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Parus ater cropped.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Parus ater cropped.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Image Tagging Image:Parus_ater_cropped.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Parus_ater_cropped.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Cecil 13:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Baden-powell1.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Baden-powell1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Geraki ^T_L^G 11:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Raven-and-the-first-men.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Raven-and-the-first-men.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 23:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Falco columbarius[edit]

In september 2005 you uploaded Image:Falco columbarius.jpg. Ou avez-vous trouvé cet image? Je ne peux pas le retrouver dans "The birds of Europe" de John Gould. Si vous voulez me repondre, je vous remercie beaucoup! (...and I hope you understand my French...)

Regards, Maarten Sepp 11:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

e-mail: maarten.sepp@yahoo.com

Hi Marteen... I only trust the website oiseaux.net. The bibliographic note was added afterward by someone else [2]. So it seems to be a small mystery ! Kelson 08:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation! Maarten Sepp

Exusez moi!
I "bad-named" your image "Pernis apivorus by John Gould improved.jpg", my mistake, considered the two images identical as the source-image is the same. No, I shall not do it again!

Kind regards, Maarten Sepp 16:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Demis_Roussos.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Demis_Roussos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Cecil 14:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Josef Pröll[edit]

Image deletion warning

Josef Pröll has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

(Sorry, I do not see any use in such "gallery") --WeHaWoe 18:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly stop removing the deletion notice from this gallery; doing so won't stop the deletion process, and will only make the gallery more likely to be deleted. Your "reason" for the latest removal, that the rest of us "are not allowed to ask for remove" of your files, is sheer wishful thinking; if it were true, there wouldn't be a deletion process (or the tags for it) in the first place.

It is you who are not allowed to remove the deletion tag (that will be done when the debate is closed), not us who are not allowed to apply it. -- Korax1214 00:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once again you try to sabotage the deletion process for this gallery by removing the tag (what part of "Do not remove this tag until the deletion request is closed" are you having so much trouble understanding?), and since such a change is forbidden by Wikimedia policy, it is clearly not a "minor" change as you mislabel it every time you make it.

If you want this gallery not to be deleted, you need to go about this properly, the Wikimedia way, by joining in the debate and giving us good reason(s) why this gallery should not be deleted; "I will not accept the suppression[sic] of this gallery" (in more neutral language, "I don't want it deleted") isn't a reason, much less a good one. At least one other user disagrees with your assertion that "Currently, this gallery, is the best way to browse images of Josef Pröll" (hence the deletion debate); this assertion could I suppose be a good reason, but your behavior is undermining this stance by giving a bad impression.

And apart from your part of it, the deletion debate is proceeding in the proper Wikimedia manner (or "based on a rule elaborated by the community" to use your own phrase).

I think you should spend a bit of time studying Commons' policies, and the pages detailing what it is and is not. -- Korax1214 07:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, as long as your deletion request is not based on a concrete policy, I do not have to discuss anything. If your decision is based on one please give me a link to this policy and I will accept the fact that there is something to discuss, otherone I wont discuss, I have created hundreds of gallery based on the policies (it is allowed), I will not start to discuss the deletion of them only because someone, with an opinion based on nothing (no policy), ask for removing pages. I keep the your banner, but please give me on which policy your opinion is based. RegardsKelson 09:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:300px-Antonio_Meucci.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:300px-Antonio_Meucci.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

Deleted page[edit]

I have restored this. Please note that removal of any deletion tag is incorrect as I feel you must know - I believe you are an experienced Wikipedian. I trust you will not do that again --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[3] c'est bien, merci.

Maintenant, exercice suivant: traduire en français la mention This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive qui figure en haut du cadre bleu. Rama 12:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Je sais pas si je suis le mieux placé pour cela, en tout cas, merci pour ton aide. Kelson 15:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Antoine_de_Jomini.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Antoine_de_Jomini.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

Coucou[edit]

Salut Kelson, j'ai vu que tu avais déjà importé 2 photo :) Juste n'oublies pas de me citer comme auteur de la photo, c'est tout ce que je demande... Si quelqu'un te demande si tu as le droit d'importer ces photos en mon nom, bien sûr que oui : "Me, Guérin Nicolas, allow Kelson to upload pictures that i took in the Zürich's Zoo on 26 june 2008 under free licences compatible Commons". Je ne sais pas si cela servira à quelque chose, mais comme je serais surement peu présent la semaine prochaine, on ne sait jamais. Bon week-end. Guérin Nicolas ^(messages) 09:58, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Nico... oui, comme tu as vu je l'avais fait. Bonne vacances. Kelson (talk) 10:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Prionus_coriarius.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Prionus_coriarius.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

Image Tagging Image:Wilhelm ostwald.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wilhelm ostwald.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

Image Tagging Image:AntonBruckner.jpeg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AntonBruckner.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

File:RichardFrancisBurton.jpeg[edit]

File:RichardFrancisBurton.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

NPG (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Kelson!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 17:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hochgerach (Austria) in winter.jpeg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Mount Greylock war memorial.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Gaetano Savi.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Frederick William Hope.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Felipe Poey signature.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Victoria's riflebird female.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Fault types fr.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Gaukler-01.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Mileva Maric.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Pilgrim's tower - Provincetown.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:VioletgreenSwallow23.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Felipe Poey.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Francis guthrie.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Francisco de Melo.jpg was uncategorized on 22 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Engelbartmice.jpg[edit]

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Engelbartmice.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Engelbartmice.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Herr Kriss (talk) 10:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

File:Clement Marot.jpg

BotMultichillT 20:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 129f7d284aa80e76537835008f38b5cf[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 129f7d284aa80e76537835008f38b5cf[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Query[edit]

Hello Kelson, I hope you are doing well. Thank you for your image uploads and contributions to Wikimedia Commons. A question has been raised about the image description of File:Muhammad 6.jpg. Please see the inquiry by Erik Warmelink (talk · contribs), at User talk:Cirt. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 15:41, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Q5ARAAlmiranteIrizar.jpg[edit]

File:Q5ARAAlmiranteIrizar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Jeff G. ツ 18:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Roustam Raza.jpg[edit]

Hello Kelson. Can you add your comment in the File talk:Roustam Raza.jpg. Geagea (talk) 15:16, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Didelphis_marsupialis.jpg[edit]

File:Didelphis_marsupialis.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

— Jeff G. ツ 07:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Empress Farah.jpg[edit]

Bonjour Kelson, pourrais-tu retourner l'image, car l'écharpe doit être sur l'épaule droite, et la médaille sur la poitrine gauche. Merci. --Minerv (talk) 11:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Knot feeding.jpg[edit]

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Knot feeding.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Knot feeding.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Amada44 ^{talk to me} 15:27, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Francis-Gary-Powers model nasm.jpg[edit]

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Francis-Gary-Powers model nasm.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Francis-Gary-Powers model nasm.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

howcheng {chat} 06:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:EdtheCon.jpg[edit]

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:EdtheCon.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:EdtheCon.jpg]]).

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Fæ (talk) 10:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Dear Kelson,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:42, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Texas birdseye maps[edit]

Many thanks for your efforts in adding the birdseye maps from birdseyeviews.org (examples: 01, 02, 03, etc.). I was wondering if you could share where you found the links to the full-resolution files?

Many thanks and kind regards, BigMapBlog (talk) 17:36, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, see answer on wpfr. Kelson (talk) 10:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Onychorhynchus coronatus.jpg[edit]

File:Onychorhynchus coronatus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:24, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jørgen Matthias Christian Schiødte.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jørgen Matthias Christian Schiødte.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Filip em (talk) 21:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalinin.jpg[edit]

File:Kalinin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 15:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poincare.jpg[edit]

File:Poincare.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 18:45, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Kelson,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 12:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Barbara Bush.jpg[edit]

File:Barbara Bush.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:51, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ca4502a7251f4d69b8509e78f782c31[edit]

TUSC token 7ca4502a7251f4d69b8509e78f782c31[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token ba4c0fff27fddb7f1e669e0d805a2065[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Bear cub.jpg[edit]

File:Bear cub.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

LFaraone 01:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Kelson,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Das Motorrad mit den Skiern von der Seite - CH-BAR - 3241064.tif, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Das Motorrad mit den Skiern von der Seite - CH-BAR - 3241064.tif has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

File:LA2-Blitz-0407 cropped.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 01:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Kelson,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Merci beaucoup[edit]

Bonjour Kelson,

La décoration comme Ambassadeur me va tout droit au coeur. Merci beaucoup; il faut dire que je ne contribue même pas comme je l'aurai souhaité (prises de vue, création des articles,...)

Ton message va encore me stimuler.

J'attends maintenant la date de la cérémonie de présentation des lettres de créances comme nouvel ambassadeur.

A te lire,

--196.202.238.15 09:48, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for feedback on my GSoC'14 proposal[edit]

Hi Kelson,

I am planning to work on the project titled "Tools for mass migration of legacy translated wiki content" this summer under Google Summer of Code. I have drafted a proposal for the same over the past few weeks. This project is going to help the translation adminstrators like you in a great way, as it would completely automate the tedious manual task of preparing a page for translation and then importing the translations into the Translate extension. You can check the proposal page for detailed information on how I plan to accomplish this.

As you would be an end user of this tool, it would be great if you could go through the proposal and provide feedback/suggestions. Your feedback would definitely help me improve the proposal as well help in creating an even better tool. You can do the same on the discussion page of the proposal or reply here, whichever is convenient for you. I look forward to hearing from you! Thank you!

P.S: I need to submit the proposal to Google by March 19, 2014.

BPositive (talk) 13:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rencontres Wikimédia et Éducation 2012 - De la production à l--39-utilisation de ressources éducatives libres - -1.webm[edit]

This file you uploaded had some issues during upload (see bugzilla:62870), but got fixed. However the description is still in a rough state. Could you fix it up? I do not know french and I not sure how to fix it. --Jarekt (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jarek, this file should be renamed, but I don't achieve to get it renamed correctly. I think the best is simply to remove it and I will try again to upload it as soon as the GWToolset is fixed (next Tuesday). Regards Kelson (talk) 09:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Rencontres Wikimédia et Éducation 2012 - De la production à l--39-utilisation de ressources éducatives libres - -1.webm[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rencontres Wikimédia et Éducation 2012 - De la production à l--39-utilisation de ressources éducatives libres - -1.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GLAMwiki toolset[edit]

Hi Kelson,

Congratulations on becoming a user of the GLAMwiki Toolset. You can find some frequently asked questions and helpful links for using the tool at GLAMwiki Toolset. As your first step, please add yourself to the list of users at GWToolset users and follow the good practice of creating pages explaining your new projects, as these can help create a focus for our wider community of volunteers. A standard place to set up a project page is at Batch uploading, though long term GLAM programmes may fall under GLAM. To discuss the tool with fellow users, please join the email list GLAMtools or try chatting at #wikimedia-commons ^webchat. SteinsplitterBot (talk) 11:24, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please test the new feature Special:PageMigration[edit]

As a Google Summer of Code Intern, I have been working on the Mass Migration tools project for Wikimedia. We are now ready with a minimal working product. The tool helps translators and translation administrators import the old translations into the Translate Extension.

An instance of the same has been set up on labs. You can find some useful instructions on the main page.

Please test the tool and report bugs/suggestions using the link provided on the main page itself. You can have a look at the tracking bug to check already reported bugs.

Looking forward to hearing from you! Cheers. BPositive (talk) 15:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Birkenzeisig1.jpg[edit]

File:Birkenzeisig1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MPF (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alcoholics anonymous board Goa 2011.jpg[edit]

File:Alcoholics anonymous board Goa 2011.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Vera ^(talk) 14:16, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiwix bookeen 1.png[edit]

File:Kiwix bookeen 1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Vera ^(talk) 14:18, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiwix bookeen 2.png[edit]

File:Kiwix bookeen 2.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Vera ^(talk) 14:18, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kiwix wikispecies screenshot.png[edit]

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kiwix wikispecies screenshot.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Vera ^(talk) 14:18, 27 December 2014 (UTC)it's very likely that the authors of the photographs in this screen capture requested attribution before use of their work. Please include links to their work and references it. Vera ^(talk) 01:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What about the creator of all the icons, and also all de developers of the Kiwix UI and also the creator of the multiple font, the creator of the logo? Should I put them all there? Kelson (talk) 08:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did it myself this time. You omitted compulsory attribution no less than 4 times. I hold your callousness in contempt. --Vera ^(talk) 18:57, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer my questions? Why should I give attribution to only part of the pictures? Kelson (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The icons in the software used fall under de GPL license if that software has such a license. No way of knowing that if you mark the works as your own works, when they're not. --Vera ^(talk) 22:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Software incorporates third part content in the same manner than Wikipedia articles incorporate third part font/picture/... Icons are not the result of my work like other parts of this screenshot. Their license is free, but it does not have to be GPL and this does not avoid to credits their respective authors... if I follow your logic. In addition, this software (Kiwix) is not my property, but the respective property of all developers which have work on its code. For this reason, I re-itare my question: why should I furnish an important identification work to credit the authors of the article underlying thumbnail and not for the rest? Where is the limit to the craziness? Which guaranty do I have that someone will not come tomorrow with additional requirements? Kelson (talk) 15:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kiwix 0.9 Ubuntu Wikivoyage.png[edit]

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kiwix 0.9 Ubuntu Wikivoyage.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera ^(talk) 19:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kiwix 0.9 alpha1 screenshot en.png[edit]

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kiwix 0.9 alpha1 screenshot en.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Vera ^(talk) 19:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Francoise Aubigne 1.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Francoise Aubigne 1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Y.haruo (talk) 00:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kiwix-ui.main.searchFor-0.png[edit]

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kiwix-ui.main.searchFor-0.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Vera ^(talk) 22:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:BairdSandpiper23.jpg[edit]

File:BairdSandpiper23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MPF (talk) 18:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nikita Denise[edit]

Nikita Denise has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SamWinchester000 (talk) 17:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Blue[edit]

Ashley Blue has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SamWinchester000 (talk) 08:35, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Mun.gif[edit]

File:Thomas Mun.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jossi (talk) 16:29, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:George John Romanes.jpg[edit]

File:George John Romanes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 06:56, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lacey Duvalle[edit]

Lacey Duvalle has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SamWinchester000 (talk) 09:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Appalachian Trail.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Appalachian Trail.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

And also:

File:USA Flag - Hyannis - Massachusetts.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both of these files clearly indicate that (1) I'm the author (2) the license. What do you want more? Please do not threat me if this is only a template problem (versus an information one). Fix it! Kelson (talk) 18:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

George Robert Waterhouse[edit]

George Robert Waterhouse has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 09:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victorias riflebird.jpg[edit]

File:Victorias riflebird.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mz7 (talk) 01:24, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Expiry of GWToolset user group memberships[edit]

There is a proposal on the Bureaucrat's noticeboard to automatically expire GWT memberships after one year unless the user requests an extension. Please add your views and suggestions to the discussion. The reasonably informal process for getting access to GWT access will remain as is.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Revi. 15:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per the proposal mentioned above your access to the GW toolset has been removed. Please feel free to request back at any time via the Bureaucrats' noticeboard. --Krd 07:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean-Michel Jarre in Warsaw cropped.jpg[edit]

File:Jean-Michel Jarre in Warsaw cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 09:12, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedrich V. von der Pfalz bis.jpg[edit]

File:Friedrich V. von der Pfalz bis.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Apparent copyright violation

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://hoogsteder.com/information/copyright/

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Riegelstamm (talk) 18:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Parotia carolae by Bowdler Sharpe.jpg[edit]

Bonjour, Je vous signale que cette image est partiellement erronée, en ce sens que la femelle, représentée en arrière-plan, ne possède pas les six plumes en forme de fil derrière la tête. C'est une particularité commune à toutes les femelles Parotia. Je ne sais pas dans quelle mesure vous seriez autorisé à retoucher cette représentation pour faire disparaître ces éléments erronés. Cordialement.--Tyerabla (talk) 15:10, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je vous encourage fortement à mettre un commentaire sur la page de description de l'image. Je ne pense pas que cela soit une bonne idée de la retouchée car c'est un document historique... Peut-être éviter son utilisation sur Wikipédia (ou vérifier les légendes). Kelson (talk) 15:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexandre Dumas 2.jpg[edit]

File:Alexandre Dumas 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thuresson (talk) 10:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:JohnBlair.jpg[edit]

File:JohnBlair.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gamaliel (talk) 18:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:LeastSandpiper23.jpg[edit]

File:LeastSandpiper23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MPF (talk) 22:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France ![edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernard Cerquiglini.jpg[edit]

File:Bernard Cerquiglini.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : -jkb-.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 21:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Switzerland[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface by simply adding the national category.

If you take part, please consider improving the description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

kiwix logo glow version[edit]

Hi Kelson, I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to follow up and provide you with the vectorial version of the glow logo. Please let me know if you have any request. Best regards and bonne annee!, Wilfredor (talk) 20:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wilfredo! Thank you! Kelson (talk) 07:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Alexandre Dumas 1.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Alexandre Dumas 1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Alexandre Dumas 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 03:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lord Byron.jpg[edit]

File:Lord Byron.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:85F:F879:283E:D0E6:77D1:DA5D:A590 12:22, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]