User talk:Kolossos

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 1 2 3

(Feel free to reactivate conversations by pulling them from the archives)



TSD[edit]

Hi, von dir kommen die Fotos zu den Technischen Sammlungen Dresden. Ich habe den Artikel etwas um Erlebnisland Mathematik (http://www.math.tu-dresden.de/alg/erlebnisland/) erweitert. Nicht ganz ohne Eigennutz empfehle ich, Fotos von diesem Ausstellungsteil zu ergänzen. Ich weiß nicht, wie mit den Rechten verfahren wird, du scheinst da Erfahrungen zu haben. TSD hat in aktuell etwas(http://www.tsd.de/aktuell). Dresden Fernsehen hat ein Video anlässlich der Eröffnung des neuen Teiles Erlebnisland hoch zwei (ab 26.3.2010) online (http://www.dresden-fernsehen.de/default.aspx?ID=6090&showNews=672571#video). Videos aus der Rohbauphase kannst du interessehalber angucken (www.tronikdesign.de/moebius/videos/moebiusbahn_kamera_eilmitfahrt.mov und www.tronikdesign.de/moebius/videos/moebius_eilrunde.mov)

LG ulf (--Ulfbastel (talk) 19:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Rechtlich ist das momentan etwas in der Grauzone. Richtig nachgefragt habe ich nicht, aber ich hatte mir eine Fotoerlaubnis für das Museum zugelegt und bei den historischen, technischen Gegenständen hatte ich auch wenig Bedenken, dass ich damit das Urheberrecht verletzen könnte. Im Gegensatz dazu gehören einige Objekte des Erlebnislandes für mich in den Bereich von Kunstobjekten, da wäre ich also schon mal vorsichtig.
Jedoch, wenn du Bilder von der Webseite nehmen willst, geht das für die Wikipedia garnicht, ohne beim Museum um Erlaubnis nachzufragen. Ich hatte mir sogar schon mal überlegt, mich im dortigen Förderverein zu engagieren weil mich das Museum fasziniert, allerdings fehlt mir auch aufgrund der Wikipedia komplett die Zeit dafür. Aber wenn du beim Museum mal nachfragst und vielleicht eine richtige Fotoerlaubniss für die Wikipedia bekämst, wäre ich gerne bereit mal mit richtiger Technik anzurücken und ordentliche Fotos zu machen. Eigentlich wäre es für ein Fotomuseum auch gut, mal den aktuellen Stand der Fototechnik z.B. mit Gigapan-Bilder zu zeigen, mit sowas könnte ich dienen und z.B. Mal ein Panorama oben vom Turm machen. Vielleicht gibt es auch noch andere Kooperationsmöglichkeiten zwischen der Wikipedia und dem Museum/dem Förderverein. --Kolossos (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dresden-Leonhardi-gp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice! --Dschwen 22:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-O2-night2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit tilted to the left. --Dschwen 19:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded a new version I hope now it is ok.--Kolossos. Yes, ok now. --Dschwen 22:48, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Business Week use of your image[edit]

An image which you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons of Florida was recently used by the magazine Bloomberg Businessweek in an article entitled 'Best Places to Raise Your Kids'. The image appeared without attribution and did not mention that it may be reproduced under a Creative Commons license. I thought it would be helpful to notify you of this fact. Contact information for Businessweek is available on its website. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 22:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Dresden-Fuerstenzug4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dresden-Fuerstenzug4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lüneburg[edit]

Hallo Kolossos, File:Lueneburg-IHK2.jpg ist anscheinend defekt oder, falls nicht, jedenfalls kaum zu managen. IrfanView konnte es zwar gerade so öffnen, zeigte aber massive Bildfehler und eine (unkomprimierte) Dateigröße von 500 MB! --Túrelio (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

War mir auch aufgefallen. Interessanterweise war es bei mir ok, aber selbst nachdem ich die Auflösung auf ein viertel runtergerechnet hatte war es auf dem Server kaputt. Naja nun geht es: File:Lueneburg-IHK.jpg. --Kolossos (talk) 17:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gigapan vs Macro[edit]

I am impressed by this technology, my work is mostly macro. Have you tried the GigaPan for macro? Merci --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not jet, what size do have in mind. My camera has a nearest focus distance of 42 cm at f=120mm. So i could try a gigapan of 15x15cm or so. two problems could be: The nodal point must be more exactly and depth of field is more restricted. Do you have an idea for a motive? --Kolossos (talk) 11:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I increase the sharpness in extreme circumstances as in: File:Heliophyllite3.jpg do you think this is possible with the Gigapan?--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I know this technic. It should be possible manually but I don't know a camera that make automatically a image series with various focus. After this I would say first it would be good to make focus stacking and than panorama stacking. Seems to be a lot work , perhaps it's easier to take a electron microscope [1] ;-). --Kolossos (talk) 20:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all this information, I will inquire about CombineZM. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lueneburg-Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI With Gigapan--Archaeodontosaurus 20:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lueneburg-IHK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI With Gigapan --Archaeodontosaurus 20:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Geocoding/Panorama project bug[edit]

Hi,

I was using your panorama script, nice idea btw., though I was unfortunately not successful. And found some issue with umlauts in the generated template. If you enter an image name containing umlauts for the GET-parameter in the address bar, they're double utf8-encoded. (At least in my browser:Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SUSE/3.5.9-0.1.1 Firefox/3.5.9)

Here: 

|image=".utf8_encode($image)."<br>

Oh, and how about giving the labels some transparency e.g.: 

background-color:rgba(200, 200, 255, 0.3);

Thanks! --Burny (talk) 20:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC), edited --Burny (talk) 20:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lueneburg-Rathsapotheke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Gdańke[edit]

Hallo Kolossos, du hast nun das Verschieberecht, bitte mache dich mit den Regeln dazu vertraut. In deinem Briefkasten solltest du im Lauf des Tages noch einen kleinen Hinweis finden. --32X (talk) 08:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wegen dir gibt es in Leutewitz keine Winkmühle mehr. Danke. --Kolossos (talk) 19:03, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Defekte Datei / "Virus" in File:Dresden-Fuerstenzug4.jpg[edit]

Hallo Kolossos. Im Support-team schlug grade eine Nachricht auf, dass besagte Datei einen Virus enthielte: "Es wurde eine Datei übertragen, die einen Virus enthält und daher von McAfee Web Gateway geblockt wird. Name des Virus: McAfeeGW: Exploit.MS04-028.JPEG.C" Ob der McAffee da nun richtig liegt oder nicht - ich kann auch nur das Thumbnail ansehen, die vollständige Datei wird von meinem Firefox als Fehlerhaft abgewiesen. Es wäre schön, wenn du dich darum kümmern könntest. Danke im Voraus --Guandalug (talk) 10:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Die Datei ist für manche Browser zu groß. Irfanview zeigt die hier (nach download) problemlos an, Microsoft Security Essentials zeigt keinen Exploit, Avira auch nicht. Dürfte ein Fehlalarm sein. -- smial (talk) 13:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Das Ding ist unter Linux mit Gimp runtergerechnet wurden, ein Virus demnach äußerst unwahrscheinlich. Avira schlug bei mir aber auch an, ich halte es aber auch für einen Fehlalarm. --Kolossos (talk) 16:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, das mit dem Gimp überzeugt mich. Danke :D --Guandalug (talk) 17:19, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dresden-canalettoblick-gp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments gute Komposition und Detailauflösung --Mbdortmund 00:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gdansk-greenBridge-gp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --Mbdortmund 00:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Kolossos!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lueger[edit]

Hi Kolossos! Ich hab den Vorschlag von User:ŠJů leicht modifiziert und die Kat. Lueger in Category:Lexikon der gesamten Technik by Otto Lueger umzubenennen angetragen. Diskussion war keine, bis jetzt, Servas Boerl2 (talk) 09:35, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn Ihr so lange Kategorienamen mögt, dann macht ruhig. Zu der Zeit als die Kategorie entstand waren halt kurzen KAtegoriennamen wie Category:Viollet-le-Duc in. Ich gebe aber zu, dass die nicht unbedingt selbsterklärend sind. --Kolossos (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yea stimmt eh, aber nur Lexikon der gesamten Technik ist auch verwirrend, oder Lueger's Lexikon ist auch naja. Wenns schon mal umbenannt wird. Die alte cat bleibt natürlich als redirect. --Boerl2 (talk) 21:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Naja jetz ist es in Category:Images from Lexikon der gesamten Technik by Otto Lueger umbenannt worden, wie User:ŠJů es ursprünglich vorgeschlagen hat. Trotzdem, der Link auf der Seite user:Kolossos ist noch alt, weiss nicht warum, kommt vielleicht noch. Richtiger Redirekt geht offenbar nicht, nur -bad name-.. naja--Boerl2 (talk) 15:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ 03:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dresden-Landtag-of-Saxony2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments (de:) starke Helligkeitskontraste gut umgesetzt Google-Translation: strong brightness contrasts well implemented --Ralf Roletschek 23:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dresden-Freiberger-Arena.jpg[edit]

File:Dresden-Freiberger-Arena.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

SBB Dresden (talk) 12:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Manche Löschanträge sind einfach nur lächerlich. Aber sie bringen Schätzchen zu Tage :-) Kaum nominiert, schon "Promotion". Gratulation, saubere Arbeit! --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Na solchen Anträgen kann man ja zumindest gelassen entgegen sehen. Wenigstens weiss ich jetzt, dass ich mal bei Gelegenheit ein aktuelles Bild machen kann. --Kolossos (talk) 22:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suche in einer Kategorie unter Ausschluss einer anderen[edit]

Hallo Kolossos,

ich habe versucht Ausschnitte der Karte Petris von 1759 vollständig in Category:Map of Kurfüstentum Sachsen (Petri 1759) zu kategorisieren. Hier finden sich jetzt 47 Dateien wieder. Im SLUB-Katalog finden sich aber 49 Karten unter dem Namen "Petri". Ist es möglich die Category:Old maps of Germany from the Deutsche Fotothek unter Ausschluss der Dateien, die zudem in der Category:Map of Kurfüstentum Sachsen (Petri 1759) eingetragen sind nach "Petri" zu durchsuchen? Ich würde so gern sicher gehen, dass ich keine Datei in der Cat vergessen habe. Lieben Gruß, WikiAnika (talk) 10:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, aber da werd ich dir nicht weiter helfen können. LG --Kolossos (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Kolossos,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed coordinates in commons-on-osm[edit]

Hi, Kolossos. Thanks for http://toolserver.org/~kolossos/openlayers/commons-on-osm.php. Maybe it would be faster — or at least cleaner — if it didn’t store long‐ungeocoded objects, like File:WLANL - arts of akki - Zonnebloemen, Vincent van Gogh, 1889.jpg (ungeocoded in June 2010) and some others, which you can see when visiting the page without any coordinates (also for some reason that 0,0 point is called South Pole — old tiles, I guess). --AVRS (talk) 22:00, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask this question User:Para. He handle all the data at http://toolserver.org/~para/GeoCommons/ . I only include his layer on a OSM-map. --Kolossos (talk) 08:47, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OSM relations, ways and so one[edit]

Hello, since the WMF have their own servers, do you think that it could be possible to get the link of the nodes, ways or relations ? Like this one in order to have the better view of the subject ? Could we also have a bot which search on the OSM servers (of WMF) the key wikipedia ? And compare the coordinates of the object with the GPS coordinates ? Thanks for your attention Otourly (talk) 18:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I work together with User:Master to use the Wikipedia-Key to embed OSM-Objects in our OSM-map. This should work without any change in Wikipedia. See: Principle of work. I will keep you I mind and give you a message if first tests are available.
Links to an OSM-ID's seems not a good idea, because they are not stable.
I hope that the New Wikidata project will be successful so that we would have a central place to save links/queries to OSM. --Kolossos (talk) 18:30, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I imagined that OSM-ID's could change (if someone destroy an element and re-create it after). But I didn't think that it could be really unstable. As I understand you will have the same result by parsing the OSM's tag called wikipedia than the idea I write. Ok that's seems great ! Otourly (talk) 17:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Problem is that you start with a simple street with one osm-ID. Later somebody detect that there is a little brigde on this street and he split the street so that you have 3 OSM-IDs. Also other edits makes it necessary to split ways e.g. different speed-limits / different surface on parts of the street. So it's not a good idea. --Kolossos (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I will follow your work with interest :) Otourly (talk) 18:43, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For your information : Template_talk:Location#Add_an_optionnal_parameter_for_OpenStreetMap (it's currently based and ways nodes and so one, I know it's not the good way but it's a start. I assume a Bot could upgrate them all easily after. Otourly (talk) 20:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilovesmonuments and OSM[edit]

Hello Kolossos, I would like to know if you want give a hand for help chapter to get map of monuments ? The roblem is that in Italy, there is no free lists of monuments available... So WMit is thinking to use the informations on OSM. Otourly (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm too busy in the moment for that. --Kolossos (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WIWOSM-screenshot2.png[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Frage zu einem Bild[edit]

Hallo, ich möchte gerne ein Bild von Dir kommerziell nutzen. Die Nutzungsbedingungen, die Du eingestellt hast, sind sehr komplex für mich. Bitte melde Dich unter: gesa.groening@hwl-agentur.de

Vielen Dank!


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

House (talk) 04:22, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permission request to use one of your pictures in a textbook[edit]

I would like to include your picture of the Zwinger tower in a textbook.This would be printed at about 5 cm high and credited to your name or any other information (location, URL, whatever) you would like to add in the legend immediately below. I can also be contacted at thechabon AxT hotmail DxOxT com.

Iiiiaaaa (talk) 16:19, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dresden-Jordanstraße-gp.jpg[edit]

Hello,

I nominated yor picture. An English description might be useful. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I am trying to understand File:WIWOSM-map-12,30,50,65.png, but there is not much description. Could you add more? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For the WIWOSM Project I hope to present in near future a zoomable map layer to show all WIWOSM objects, it seeems useful to get an overview about the project activities in different countries and find missing objects. The map should also document the porject growth over the years. --Kolossos (talk) 08:14, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Kolossos,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 12:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Krefeld Wappen.svg[edit]

File:Krefeld Wappen.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ 00:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My camera is now a Sony SLT-A55V[edit]

Wann beginnt now ?. Kanns'de das mal mit hinschreim ? Wäre nett, Vielen Dank. SabS 92.225.77.105 01:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ebstorfer-stich2.jpg is in public domain[edit]

Hello,

A public domain review of File:Ebstorfer-stich2.jpg showed this file is a scan of a document in public domain.

The technical operation to merge pictures is a technical operation not opening new copyrights.

New licensing information tags:

This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.

You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.
The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain".
This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details.

(diff)

Note: someone already previously replaced the original open sources licenses by a {{PD-Old}}. --Dereckson (talk) 19:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sharemap reponse[edit]

Answer on the discussion page

--Jkan997 (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ShareMap update[edit]

Next answer on the discussion page

--Jkan997 (talk) 14:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ILA-Pitotrohr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 21:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ShareMap answer 3[edit]

Next answer on the discussion page

--Jkan997 (talk) 12:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No photo report[edit]

Greetings! I have been using this link to find wp.en articles on local places that lack a photograph. Unfortunately, the underlying KML service doesn't seem to have been working consistently in the last week. Should I be using a different link? Thanks! Bovlb (talk) 23:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For me it works.
You can try OpenStreetMap as Baselayer in this tool. The KML is the same. There are a lot of reasons possible, so I and the WMF are working on https-support and also Google is working on Google Maps. Sometimes also the Toolserver very slow. So can't say the reason. --Kolossos (talk) 19:54, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. It was your mention of HTPPS that gave me the clue. I changed the underlying toolserver link from HTTP to HTTPS and now it works. [2]. Thank you. Bovlb (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Kolossos,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Kolossos,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Wiki Loves Monuments logo

FYI[edit]

http://www.trustgoldankauf.de/goldankauf-halle/ --Martina talk 18:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Erlwein-Büste von Georg Wrba[edit]

  • Zuordnung
  • Hans Erlwein
    Hans Erlwein
  • Johannes Georg Stöckel
    Johannes Georg Stöckel
  • Messering 3
    Messering 3
  • Messering 1
    Messering 1

Hallo Kolossos, kannst Du mir bitte mitteilen, wo die von Dir aufgenommene oben genannte Büste steht (File:Dresden-Erlwein-Wrba.jpg)? Danke! MfG --Dgarte (talk) 08:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn es nicht noch eine weitere gibt, dann siehe meine Annotation hier: File:Messering 1 Friedrichstadt 1.JPG, Lageangabe über w:de:Liste der Kulturdenkmale in der Friedrichstadt (Dresden)#Ladengebäude, Messering 1. -- 32X (talk) 20:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dgarte: Ich muss mich korrigieren, es gibt dort dicht beieinander zwei Büsten. Erlweins ist repräsentativ am Mittelrisalit des Gebäudes Messering 3 angebracht, Stöckels wenige Meter weiter an der schmalen Fassade des Gebäudes Messering 1, beide zeigen zur gleichen Straßenseite. Ich habe die Lageangaben bei beiden eingetragen. -- 32X (talk) 09:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bildverwendung[edit]

Ärzteblatt Sachsen 1/2013. Gruß --X-Weinzar (talk) 22:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wie lange braucht es bis Bilder in Commons on OSM erscheinen?[edit]

Hallo Kolossos, du machst das ja mit dem Commons on OSM, wo man geocodierte Bilder auf der Karte sehen kann. Ich habe Anfang des Jahres ein paar Bilder mit der Vorlage:Location dec ausgestattet (Beispiel), aber bis jetzt sind die nicht auf der OSM-Karte zu sehen. Kannst du mir sagen wie lange das ungefähr braucht bis die dort erscheinen? Viele Grüße --Pustekuchen2014 (talk) 09:42, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe mal die Frage an den zuständigen Entwickler weitergegeben:User_talk:Para#Missing_pictures_on_the_map. Leider ist er nicht sonderlich aktiv mehr, sodass die Antwort etwas dauern kann. Ich kann die Frage nicht beantworten, von mir stammt nur das OpenLayers framework. --Kolossos (talk) 20:00, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, danke dafür. Mal schauen ob eine Antwort kommt. --Pustekuchen2014 (talk) 16:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hilfe[edit]

lb Kolossos, ich hab voriges Jahr ein Oregon 600 gekauft, leider nur einmal verwendet, weil ich mich auch nicht wirklich ausgekannt habe. Wenn ich das in der Oberlausitz beim Neißetreffen verwenden möchte, welche Karten kann ich mir zB von der Oberlausitz runterladen (OSM), oder ist es besser, wenn ich gleich das Tablet mit OSMand+ verwende. Da hab ich die Karten schon drauf. Vielleicht hast du einmal eine halbe Stunde zeit. lb grüße aus Wien --Hubertl (talk) 15:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hubertl, ich benutze auch OSMAND, weil mein Garmin damals leider eine Sparversion ohne SD-Karte war. Der GPS-Empfänger ist in so einem Garmin wirklich besser als in einem Handy. Was aber keine Rolle spielt, wenn man die Gebäude eh vom Bing-Luftbild abmalt.
Zu deiner Frage: Als Karte würde ich eine Grenzüberschreitende Region von BBBike mir aussuchen, der Stil "Garmin Freizeitkarte" zeigt als einzigster Gebäude an und ist daher wohl zu bevorzugen. --Kolossos (talk) 21:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, bin schon am Runterladen. Freu mich schon auf das Wochenende--Hubertl (talk) 22:55, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

Hallo Kolossos,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Für die Westansicht des Meißner Doms! Aarp65 (talk) 01:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

zoomable-images[edit]

Hallo Kolossos, die URL https://tools.wmflabs.org/zoomable-images/zoomify.php?path= meldet „No webservice“. Ist das ein temporäres Problem oder ist die Funktion abgeschaltet? Grüße --Trzęsacz (talk) 11:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gibt ja auch noch den ZoomViewer :-) --Dschwen (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Die zoomable URL hat eine andere Funktion. Es geht ums zoomen externer Bilder, die dann herausgeschossen werden können, z.B.Christies Bilder. :-) --Trzęsacz (talk) 20:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. Zum "rippen" sozusagen? --Dschwen (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Es funktioniert wieder. Was man damit alles machen kann, ist hier erklärt. --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Import from Gallica[edit]

Hi, Is there a tool to replace the one mentioned here? BTW this blog post should be updated. And here too: Help:Zoomable images#Google_Highres images. ;o) Regards, Yann (talk) 16:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nockenwelle [CC-W3][edit]

Hallo.

Wir bitten um Kontaktaufnahme via E-Mail bezügl. der Nutzung des Bildes in einer unkommerziellen Schulungsunterlage.

Betreff: Nockenwelle [CC-W3] Empfänger: dg @ knusperdesign . de

Vielen Dank!

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]

Hallo Kolossos,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Glam on Tour in den Technischen Sammlungen Dresden[edit]

Hallo Kolossos,

ich hatte dein Bild der Leibnitz-Rechenmaschine in bester Absicht mit einer neuen Version überladen. Nun habe ich es aber wieder rückgängig gemacht, und werde es als neues Bild hochladen. --Mr N (talk) 12:49, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dank dir fürs zurücksetzen, insbesonders weil das doch eine andere Perspektive hat. --Kolossos (talk) 18:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Locator-tool[edit]

https://tools.wmflabs.org/locator-tool/#/

Bautzen-pano-day-gp.jpg[edit]

Hallo Kolossos, darf das Bild unter den genannten Bedingungen (Nennung usw.) ohne weitere Forderungen ín einer Veröffentlichung (Fachartikel) verwendet werden? Danke und Gruß, SchiFaKo — Preceding unsigned comment added by SchiFaKo (talk • contribs) 08:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Na klar, dafür ist die Lizenz ja da. Vorschlag für die Namensnennung: "Foto:Kolossos@Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA)". --Kolossos (talk) 18:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image Permission[edit]

Dear Kolossos,
I am a retired Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. It is an educative, reference and cultural book. I would like to use your image which I think belongs to your copyrights and I reach from
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dresden-Kristallpalast-nigh.jpg
I will appreciate if you let me know your terms and conditions for the image's usage permission.
Yours Sincerely
Prof. Arch. Mustafa Demirkan
mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com
--Mustidede (talk) 14:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can use it free also for commercial usecases, you have to mention me and the license by: Photo: kolossos@wikipedia (CC-BY-SA)
--Kolossos (talk) 22:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder[edit]

Hallo Kolossos, kannst du mal bei deinen älteren Bildern die Beschreibungs-Infobox einbauen. Der Text "Source: taken by user" findet sich bei einigen deiner Bildern. Siehe diese Suchanfrage. Nicht alle gefunden Bilder (ca. 250) sind deine Bilder. Schau dir mal alle an, vielleicht findest du noch einige weiter hinten im Suchergebnis. - (Siehe auch: m:File_metadata_cleanup_drive/de) -- sk (talk) 14:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop[edit]

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:51, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons on OSM[edit]

Hi Kolossos, do you know maybe, who is the developer-maintainer of this tool? I received messages, that it isn't updated for images uploaded in the last 5-6 months. (See others reports here on Commons, and on phabricator). It looks like a long-standing problem. Thanks! Samat (talk) 10:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Samat: Sorry for late response. I only handle the frontend of the tool commons-on-osm. The problem is in the backend geocommons, which was maintained by user:Para and now perhaps by User:Sladen. You can ask them. Alternative is perhaps the new tool wikimaps. It works with stable API from WMF. --Kolossos (talk) 22:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Medea-chart database on old nautical charts[edit]

Hi, I’m sending this message to all participants of Commons Wikimaps listed here, so that I can be pretty sure it will get to some of you. I am the Principal Investigator of the ERC funded project Medea-Chart ([3]), hosted by the University of Lisbon, whose scientific objective is the study of the genesis, evolution and use of nautical charts from the Middle Ages to the early modern period. One of the visible outcomes of our project is the Medea-Chart database, aimed at storing and making available information and images of all extant manuscript nautical charts: [4]. Since the images of old maps and charts are now in the public domain and our database is open to all, I’m sure your project could benefit from it. The most obvious way would be to download from there all the images you are interested in, but I imagine you could use the tool for more sophisticated purposes. For now, I invite all of you to go there, browse the database, do geographical searches, read our “Chart of the Week” mini-articles, etc. You don’t even need to register for that. Registration is only required for those interested in downloading high resolution images or producing reports. Best wishes and have fun, Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kolossos&oldid=607934417"