User talk:Luigi Chiesa

Lombardia[edit]

Ciao dato che oggi giorno la provincia di monza confina con quella di bergamo, bisognerebbe modificare la cartina nella pagina Lombardia allungando il confine della provincia di monza con la provincia di bergamo. Dato che la cartina l'ho già modificata io, ma non riesco a inserirla, te la potrei gent inviare a te così la sostutuisci te? Mi faresti 1 grosso piacere oppure sarei lieto se mi spiegasti come si fa' a metterla...Grazie Simonemb (msg) 16.56, 20 feb 2010 (CET)

Pizzo Scais[edit]

Ciao, sincermente non ne sono sicuro al 100%, ma dal luogo presso cui ho scattato la foto veniva indicato (tramite disco del CAI) come Pizzo Scais. Proverò a documentarmi meglio nei prossimi giorni. Ciao e grazie Ago76 msg

Treviglio[edit]

Ciao! Mi chiedevo se potessi registrare anche le pronuncie delle 4 frazioni di Treviglio: Battaglie, Castel Cerreto, Geromina e Pezzoli... --Simauer (talk) 12:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coronate[edit]

Intanto ti ringrazio per l'attenzione e per l'intervento.

Non sapevo che Coronate avesse cambiato nome: non c'è più religione, non fai a tempo a rilassarti un attimo che cambiano nome alle città. Quaggiù sulle sponde del Tevere siamo evidentemente rimasti all'antica ;-)

Ho visto che hai messo un font "sans serif" (io avevo scelto, perché erano nelle lista dei font "compatibili", Times, e poi ho provato con DejaVu)

Cosa altro hai cambiato? Ma soprattutto con quale SW? Sai se corre anche su Mac? Oppure sai a chi posso chiedere aiuto per essere "autonomo"?

--Carlomorino (talk) 16:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aggiungo il mio grazie, da mero esecutore materiale (il mandante è quello qua sopra) :-) --Castagna (talk) 17:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, ti chiedo un ulteriore favore per il File:Battaglia di Coronate.svg: è stato rilevato un refuso nel cartiglio in alto a sinistra: l'anno è il 689, non il 698 (svista già presente nel png originale). Siccome sono totalmente inabile nel modificarlo, e visto che avevi già avuto la cortesia di prenderti cura del file, non è che potresti, se hai un minuto, rettificare anche questo errorino? Grazie,--Castagna (talk) 21:21, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ti ringrazio ancora, io non avrei proprio saputo come intervenire senza far danni :-) --Castagna (talk) 23:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Luigi Chiesa!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 18:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Recco01.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Copyright Inquiry[edit]

Dear Luigi, I am e-mailing from a production company in England and we are making a documentary series for National Geographic. We would love to use the image you have uploaded, Papyrus In museo egizio, within our documentary. Before we can do so, we need to double check this image is in the public domain. It would be great to discuss this further over e-mail. Please e-mail me at Ellie.davis@parthenonentertainment.com.

Many Thanks,

Ellie

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pannocchia sgranata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good & excellent DOF for such a close-up -- H005 17:13, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Accetta[edit]

Ciao Luigi
Ho utilizzato la tua accetta per il mio video "Wenn der Pott aber nu ein Loch hat"
Spero che ti piaccia:

(titolo menzionato nella descrizione)
Wenn der Pott
Amicizie
David
Dwsolo (talk) 11:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help ![edit]

Ciao Luigi. Ho bisogno dei tuoi lumi. Mi spieghi: quando tu caratterizzi una nuova categoria semplicemente con {{ComuneBG Italy}} che cosa significa? che succede? come funziona? Si chiama "template"? Scusami l'ignoranza... Forse è un'abbreviazione che raccoglie sempre le stesse categorie che tu hai fissato? Ti sarei molto grato se mi potessi spiegare per filo e per segno in che cosa consiste e come funziona. Colmeresti una mia grossa lacuna. Ciao! --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per le tue informazioni precise. Ci penserò, per dove mi potrebbe tornare utile. Veramente sarebbe utile per i comuni di ciascuna provincia d'Italia... Per intanto finiamo il nostro riordino delle regioni italiane (oramai ne mancano solo ancora un paio) e poi vedreamo. Grazie ancora di tutto. E se permetti, mi rivolgerò a te per farmi aiutare nella realizzazione del template. Ciao! --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sarebbe una gran cosa. Nonostante il mio riordino e sistemazione in categorie uniformi e standard, la situazione dei comuni italiani resta piena di problemi e abbastanza disastrosa. Appena finito il lavoro relazionerò al bar italiano sul lavoro fatto e su quello che c'è da fare (il che è immenso!). Quando anche tu saprai che cosa è carente e c'è da fare, mi potrai dire tu stesso come la vedi e che cosa si potrebbe fare secondo te di proficuo e di razionale. Sarebbe bellissimo poter poi risolvere insieme delle carenze gravi in questo immenso patrimonio di immagini! Grazie ancora. --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Giusto per precisione, qualora non l'avessi già costatato tu di persona: le regioni che NON ho ancora riordinato sono Tuscany, Veneto, Lombardy. --DenghiùComm (talk) 22:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, grazie. Ne farò tesoro; e spero di esserne anche all'altezza. Se sbaglierò qualcosa, fammelo poi sapere. Salut! --DenghiùComm (talk) 22:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ComuneItaly[edit]

Posso mettere le 5 provincie del Lazio?

--Carlomorino (talk) 13:36, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Credo debbano essere così:


|VT = {{ComuneItaly/desc|municipality={{{2|{{PAGENAME}}}}}|province={{Viterbo}}|region={{Lazio}}}}{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Category|[[Category:Municipalities in province of Viterbo]][[Category:Cities in Italy]]| }}|
|LT = {{ComuneItaly/desc|municipality={{{2|{{PAGENAME}}}}}|province={{Latina}}|region={{Lazio}}}}{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Category|[[Category:Municipalities in province of Latina]][[Category:Cities in Italy]]| }}|
|FR = {{ComuneItaly/desc|municipality={{{2|{{PAGENAME}}}}}|province={{Frosinone}}|region={{Lazio}}}}{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Category|[[Category:Municipalities in province of Frosinone]][[Category:Cities in Italy]]| }}|
|RM = {{ComuneItaly/desc|municipality={{{2|{{PAGENAME}}}}}|province={{Rome}}|region={{Lazio}}}}{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Category|[[Category:Municipalities in province of Rome]][[Category:Cities in Italy]]| }}|
|RI = {{ComuneItaly/desc|municipality={{{2|{{PAGENAME}}}}}|province={{Rieti}}|region={{Lazio}}}}{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Category|[[Category:Municipalities in province of Rieti]][[Category:Cities in Italy]]| }}|

-- Carlo

Sono stato troppo veloce? Mi sono fatto prendere la mano? Ho fatto casini irreparabili?

--Carlomorino (talk) 14:54, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"XXX è un comune italiano della provincia di Viterbo, in Lazio.

A me sembra grammaticalmente scorretto per alcune regioni: Lazio, Marche, Veneto e, forse, Molise. Sarebbe "nel Lazio, nelle Marche, nel Veneto. Ovviamente non ho idea di come si possa cambiare. Forse "nella regione Lazio, Marche etc."

--Carlomorino (talk) 13:04, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Riordino Comuni Italiani[edit]

Ciao Luigi. Volevo avvisarti che sul Bar Italiano mi sono deciso a pubblicare la mia comunicazione sul lavoro che ho svolto di riordino dei comuni italiani e a cui mi sto dedicando dal giugno scorso. La pubblico ora benchè il lavoro non sia ancora del tutto completato, perchè penso che sia oramai inderogabile, dato l'egregio lavoro che stai facendo anche tu, e che rischia di rendere fra poco desueta la mia comunicazione. Mi riferisco naturalmente alle nostre discussioni sulla necessità di spostare certe categorie da Cities a Municipalities. Quindi per intanto prendi la mia comunicazione col beneficio dell'inventario. Sono già all'estero per le festività di fine anno e non sempre mi è possibile di intervenire prontamente nei dibattiti. Ti auguro buone feste! Ciao e a presto, --DenghiùComm (talk) 19:19, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Auguri[edit]

tanti

--Carlomorino (talk) 18:26, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help Template[edit]

Ciao Luigi. Dimmi un po', è sempre ancora valido il tuo invito a rivolgermi a te per realizzare un nuovo template? Se sì, fammi sapere e ti dirò di che si tratta. Non dovrebbe essere nulla di difficile (per te), perchè è da ricalcare altri già esistenti, con qualche piccola modifica. Il guaio è che io non ho alcuna conoscenza nè dunque capacità in programmazione informatica... Salutoni, --DenghiùComm (talk) 17:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Allora, è da giorni che sto lavorando alla realizzazione del Catalogo del Museo Archeologico di Napoli, e sto per concludere la ricognizione e la verifica delle immagini esistenti. Il catalogo l’ho realizzato sulla falsariga di quelli che Giovanni Dall’Orto ha realizzato per le foto dei maggiori fotografi in bianco e nero, ma a differenza di quelli che sono organizzati rigorosamente per numero di catalogo, per il Museo non ho voluto prescindere dalle attuali collezioni e collocazione dei pezzi, affinché esso resti comunque uno strumento di ricerca e non solo un marasma di oggetti, ordinatissimo numericamente, ma che fa riferimento unicamente ai criteri espositivi dei Borboni, oggi non più validi e non più applicati. Comunque in incipit ho spiegato quali erano le suddivisioni concepite in epoca borbonica, quindi questo dato strettamente “inventariale” non è comunque andato perso. Detto questo, ora vorrei passare a dare una descrizione completa ed ordinata ad ogni pezzo del Museo, e per questo penso che sia necessario – e sia oramai giunto il momento – di realizzare un Template adeguato. Ho dato dapprima uno sguardo al Template “Painting” (giusto perché ci sono inciampato relativamente all’affresco di Medea), ma naturalmente quello è calibrato più su di una pinacoteca, e quindi male si adatta ai reperti di ogni genere che possono esistere in un museo archeologico. Ho notato fra l’altro che il Template Painting di cui tu ti sei servito per la realizzazione dei template regionali è alquanto diverso da quest’altro template painting applicato qui: difatti nel tuo la datazione (Year) si riferisce all’opera d’arte mentre in quest’ultimo si riferisce alla realizzazione dell’immagine. Ho guardato allora cosa veniva applicato in musei archeologici, ed ho scoperto che per quelli romani (p.es. i Musei Vaticani, o i Musei Capitolini) è stato realizzato un Template che è praticamente lo stesso, e funzionerebbe abbastanza bene anche per le mie necessità. Per esempio questo dei Musei Capitolini mi piace molto, e corrisponde quasi in tutto a quello che vorrei venisse realizzato per il MANN: la dizione mi sembra scritta in modo corretto (per noi sarebbe “Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Napoli, Italia”), anche per il colore dello sfondo avevo pensato proprio a questo vinaccia che si avvicina molto al cd. “rosso borbonico” applicato a molti palazzi da loro edificati. Quello che cambierei sarebbe piuttosto l’ordine di alcune voci: 1) la Location la metterei al primo posto, subito sotto l’indicazione del nome del museo; poi metterei Artist; poi Description; poi inserirei una voce mancante, quella della datazione Year; poi Dimensions; poi Credit Line; poi Accession Number; poi References; poi Source; ed infine Other Versions. Il colore rosa di sfondo lo riserverei solo ai campi delle informazioni strettamente pertinenti l’opera, quindi Artist, Description, Year, ed eventualmente (ma non per forza) Dimensions. Cosa ne pensi? Si potrebbe fare? Per inciso poi mi (e ti) chiedo: ma per fare un Template bisogna chiedere un’autorizzazione, o una approvazione da parte di qualche admin? E per modificarlo successivamente? Attendo tue nuove. E grazie di tutto fin d'ora. --DenghiùComm (talk) 09:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Già così è meraviglioso. Poi col tempo vedremo di migliorarlo. Mille grazie ancora! Sei stato velocissimo! --DenghiùComm (talk) 14:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS : Domanda cretina: ma un domani, se si volesse poi cambiare l'ordine delle diverse voci, ciò interferirà negativamente sui dati immessi nei diversi files, oppure appunto no, trattandosi di un template? --DenghiùComm (talk) 14:32, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per i tuoi chiarimenti. --DenghiùComm (talk) 17:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categoria[edit]

Ti ringrazio per la creazione di Category:Raduno Auto Storiche di Medole. Tuttavia, visto che le foto sono relative sia al raduno auto che a quello moto e di varie annate, credo sarebbe più esatto il titolo "Raduni Auto e Moto Storiche a Medole". Se potessi farlo tu... (io non saprei come fare). Ciao. --Ligabo (talk) 17:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Probabilmente non mi sono spiegato bene.

Più che per le diverse annate, il problema nasce dal fatto che sono due distinte manifestazioni: una per le automobili e una per le motociclette. Ne discende che le foto sono miste tra auto e moto.

Stante la scarsa importanza settoriale di entrambe le manifestazioni e la sempre incerta periodicità, anch'io ritengo inutile creare sottocategorie, suddividendo per tipo di veicoli e annate. Per manifestazioni tanto marginali, una categoria basta e avanza.

Tuttavia, il titolo è fuorviante, perché se cercassi fotografie di motociclette, certamente non le cercherei in una categoria intitolata "Raduno Auto Storiche di Medole".

Se non va bene "Raduni Auto e Moto Storiche a Medole", si può mettere al singolare, oppure titolare "Raduno Veicoli storici a Medole", in modo che chi legge capisca che si tratta di foto relative sia alle 2ruote, sia alle 4ruote.

In italiano o inglese, poco importa. --Ligabo (talk) 10:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Le denominazioni ufficiali sono "Raduno Moto Storiche a Medole" e "Raduno Auto Storiche a Medole". Non abbiamo molta fantasia. :-) --Ligabo (talk) 10:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC) P.S.: Complimenti per le fotografie e i disegni. Vedo che lo schema del vulcano è stato adottato anche all'estero dai solitamente schizzinosi francesi. Ottimo lavoro.[reply]

Doppia categoria: lusso sfrenato. Giacché ti sei offerto (se non ho capito male) potrei compilare (con calma) un elenco di categorie mancanti o sbagliate (ne ho viste molte nel settore auto-moto) e poi te lo passo. --Ligabo (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roma Metro Ferrovia 2010.png[edit]

Ciao Luigi,

volevo chiederti cortesemente di togliere l'avviso sulle mie immagini di abuso del copyright, non avevo capito bene quella parte e mi sono basato su quello fatto da altri,ho aggiunto le fonti interne di wikimedia commons. Sto pubblicando le immagini in png solo perché sono ancora in fase beta il mio scopo, una volta completato la mappa con tutti futuri sviluppi del sistema su ferro di Roma, è quello di pubblicare il file svg completo di livelli e di rilasciarlo come pubblico dominio, ho apprezzato tantissimo il tuo suggerimento e ti prego in futuro di evidenziare eventuali problemi grafici.... la mia prossima modifica sarà legata alla linea FR1.

Saluti Barlemi74

Luigino[edit]

Grazie.

--Carlomorino (talk) 15:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valid svg[edit]

Ti ringrazio per aver editato una delle parecchie immagini svg che ho caricato recentemente. Immagino che la modifica riguardi il codice interno del file, che non conosco minimamente; sono un perfetto principiante e ho usato semplicemente il nuovo tool Google docs. Mi interesserebbe sapere se hai individuato un problema piuttosto serio o se si trattava di una "minuzia". Grazie! --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 22:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perfetto, sono rassicurato! Mi muovo, come dicevo, in un terreno sconosciuto. Mi piacerebbe approfondire il tema svg ma la lista delle cose da approfondire (pywikipedia, python, API, Vector, eccetera eccetera) sta diventando un po' lunghetta per i miei neuroni classe 1952 di "informatico assolutamente dilettante" ;-) --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 23:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cupeta.jpg[edit]

File:Cupeta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

File:Umberto_Eco_01.jpg[edit]

Ciao, se l'hai ancora credo che sarebbe meglio inoltrare l'autorizzazione per questa immagine a OTRS. --Nemo 09:11, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ComuneItaly (parte seconda)[edit]

Ciao! Ho notato che hai messo la descrizione del template in diverse lingue. Se vai su Category:Venetico ne troverai un altro paio da aggiungere. Spero che ti possa essere utile, buona serata! -- Vonvikken (talk) 22:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distributore metano.jpg[edit]

File:Distributore metano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-- fetchcomms☛ 01:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Template ComuneItaly[edit]

Ah ok, grazie dell'informazione! :-) Non fa nulla se lascio i link "superflui" nelle categorie già presenti, vero? Buona serata! -- Vonvikken (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Ho parlato con Denghiù, mi ha spiegato la questione della ridondanza fra le categorie con Municipalities e Cities, per cui provvederò a rimuovere queste ultime. Ciao! -- Vonvikken (talk) 20:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Luigi. Vengo a te per la soluzione di un problema. Se vai nella Category:Province of South Tyrol troverai che le municipalità sono raddoppiate. Il Trentino-Alto Adige come sicuramente saprai è oramai organizzato (dopo feroci discussioni di un anno fa) nelle province di Trento e del South Tyrol. Ora noto che l'applicazione del template {{ComuneItaly|BZ}} ha portato alla creazione della Category:Municipalities in province of Bolzano dove ci finiscono i comuni cui è stato applicato il template. Ci ho messo la redirect, ma questo chiaramente non basta perché i comuni ci finiscono dentro comunque; invece debbono finire nella Category:Municipalities in province of South Tyrol (dove del resto già ci stanno). Puoi risolvere tu il problema del giusto percorso? Grazie ! --DenghiùComm (talk) 20:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie infinite ! --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And again ...[edit]

Again Luigi, thank you very much for your valuable help. One day, all categories will be alright ... --Foroa (talk) 08:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PIL Italia III-2009.svg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Ciao[edit]

Template:Sëlva ha la categoria Turin. Non mi convince.

--Carlomorino (talk) 11:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

su Le monete attribuite alla zecca dell'antica città di Luceria pag 47.jpg[edit]

Ho visto la ripulitura di File:Le monete attribuite alla zecca dell'antica città di Luceria pag 47.jpg. Che meraviglia! Che cosa usi? Io per anni ho lottato con GIMP ma ha sempre vinto lui. Non ho mai capito la questione dei livelli. :-( :-( :-( --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 08:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cucù[edit]

File:Dell'oreficeria antica 0.png

-- Anonimo itagliano

glazie moltissimo da Beijing

quten Tag. Io tetesco di Romen afere fatto altra scnazionene di lipro: File:Dell'oreficeria antica 67.png. Se foi folere toghlire marrone e fare tresparenten io tire molte Danken.

-- Karl Morinen.

Merci beaucoup

-- Charles

homessoladesrizioneancheinitaliano. Messe anche altre cat. Forsedaaggiungerealtre (ad esempio ducato di Urbino).

Si poi lei ha tempo in Category:La grammatica del dialetto romanesco ci sono due piccoli file. Se lei può fare .png color pianco e makari anche .svg trasparente io do baci a tutta famiglia.

E offro anche caffè.

--Carlomorino (talk) 12:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Foto francobolli mondiali[edit]

Ciao, scusa se stresso ancora te ma, dato che mi hai fatto la cortesia di caricare i francobolli sovietico-russi per conto mio tempo fa, forse sai rispondermi. Dato che vedo molte licenze compatibili utilizzate su francobolli di varia nazionalità chiedevo se e come è possibile caricare francobolli di stati africani in genere, sempre alla ricerca di immagini alternative alle foto per corredare voci sull'aviazione (mezzi, infrastrutture, personaggi, compagnie aeree...). Hai idea come fare?--Threecharlie (talk) 23:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dato che non leggo nessuno degli stati africani che mi interessano, e tra l'altro è citato solo il Sud Africa quando sono certo, perché sono andato a fare una ricerca con il lanternino, ci sono anche quelli egiziani con apposito template, o mi rassegno o li carico in locale con la licenza generica simil-fair use che si usa per i francobolli in it.wiki. In particolare avevo due francobolli del Benin, ma vedo che uno di quel paese è già presente (con licenza però sbagliata), caricato a corredo di una voce sui funghi, e proposto anche per la cancellazione. Che mi consigli allora?--Threecharlie (talk) 16:03, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abramo Lincoln 0008.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:38, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Sestertius monogram.svg[edit]

scusa se ti rompo, ma Illustrator mi incasina le immagini.

Puoi dargli una sistemata, per favore?

--Carlomorino (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grazissime. --Carlomorino (talk) 17:16, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done

BTW, io farei la cartella con il libro.

--Carlomorino (talk) 17:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons talk:WikiProject Chemistry#Template:Molecule[edit]

Hi Luigi. Please participate in the discussion. --Leyo 13:39, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trillium vaseyi.jpg[edit]

Caro Luigi,

You have in the past asked to move the picture "Trillium vasey.jpg" to File:Trillium vaseyi.jpg.

This causes a conflict with a local file of the English wikipedia, which has the same name Trillium vaseyi.jpg. Therefore I have asked to rename it to "Trillium vaseyi02.jpg".

Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 14:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saluti da it.source[edit]

Vedo che ti do un gran lavoro. :-(

Siccome carico moltissime immagini utilizzate in it.source, o altri progetti source: c'è una bella pagina sulla categorizzazione ecc. adatta a file djvu, pdf e file a immagine singola (illustrazioni, fregi, capilettera, oggetti grafici elementari)? Vorrei farti lavorare meno in futuro... --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 19:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ma guarda un po'. Ritiro immediatamente la mia frase di chiusura: non voglio affatto farti lavorare di meno (nè source, nè qui :-): troppo utile! ).

Rispondimi pure qui che seguiamo meglio il corso della discussione. GIMP, come vedo da una precedente discussione! Ti segnalo un utente molto interessante, se già non lo conosci: en:s:Inductiveload. Uno che maneggia i batch di GIMP, e anche,a fondo, i file djvu (particolarmente interessante l'inserimento nei djvu dei layer di testo). Trovi sulla sua pagina utente un'impressionante raccolta di link ai suoi script. Io non ho ancora cominciato a dissodarli.

Ti chiederei - vista la tua esperienza in Commons - di esporre in it.source le tue proposte per diminuire il grado di disordine dei nostri contributi djvu e pdf (e anche sulla questione delle ilustrazioni, fregi eccetera: i jpg-png-svf di supporto); magari dicendoci qualcosina sull'astruso namespace Creator che dovremo deciderci a usare. Crea pure una sottopagina di it:s:Progetto:Trascrizioni, se pensi di poter accogliere la mia supplica. ;-) --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 23:24, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per qualche tempo avrò poche possibilità di lavorare ai wiki, ma vedrò di mettere insieme qualcosa. --Luigi Chiesa (talk) 22:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tue Foto[edit]

Posso usare le tue foto per gli articoli della versione inglese di wikipedia? Non ci sono problemi di diritti d'autore?en:User:Lucifero4

Orsemanship for Women :-([edit]

Grazie per la correzione. Aimè, Commonist è uno strumento da usare cum grano salis, e il mio grano l'avevo appannato. Avevo giusto chiesto un account bot per correggere, ma mi hai preceduto. Spero che non ti sia costata troppa fatica. Grazie ancora! --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 15:46, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 27657231bb87a19b4c8a9c5b92b4d58b[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Creazione immaggine[edit]

Ciao Luigi ho visto che hai creato varie immaggini delle coppe sportive e volevo chiederti se potevi creare anche l'immagine di questa coppa.Grazie --Ste81 (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Descrizione dei libri[edit]

Caro Luigi,

ho appena visto il Le pitture notabili di Bergamo.djvu e la descrizione che ne hai dato.

Mi sono imbarazzato: è da un po' di tempo che aggiorno le descrizioni dei libri di Wikisource con le indicazioni da te proposte qui e usando dunque come esempio Il Principe.djvu, eppure vedo ora che nel descrivere un tuo upload usi una metodologia antiquata.

Dato che su commons mi muovo con alquanto impaccio e dato che sto usando diverso tempo nel namespace Creator e nella sistemazione di descrizioni precedenti volevo chiederti se sto sbagliando qualcosa o cosa debba fare... - εΔ ω 10:58, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Your tireless and silent cross-contribution avoid it.wikisource users hassle ad embarassment. εΔ ω 06:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Permission to use colonne_distillazione.jpg[edit]

Hello Luigi,

We'd like to ask permission to use your photo called colonne_distillation.jpg in a textbook. Would you be willing to sign a permission request form? The publisher doesn't allow us to use Creative Commons photos without a signed form. If you can help, please email me at andrea.labarge1@gmail.com. Thanks.

Andrea LaBarge Topaz Publications, Inc.

Come si fa?[edit]

Ciao Luigi. Mi sto occupando del trasferimento su Wikisource della Guida di Palmieri, e ho visto che hai integrato le immagini. Mi spiegheresti come hai fatto ed estrarle dal djvu? Grazie! :) --Lalupa (talk) 23:39, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Capito, Luigi, grazie. In effetti dopo averti scritto ieri sera avevo fatto qualche prova usando il metodo che tu indichi. Speravo che ci fossero soluzioni meno artigianali, ma ok, faremo all'antica :). Grazie tante dell'attenzione --Lalupa (talk) 12:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scusa per il lavoro sporco[edit]

...a forza di scrivere di aerei evidentemente mi è rimasto nei tasti.... grazie per la ripassata agli anfibi dei Vigili del Fuoco :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 19:33, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patria Esercito Re p357b.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Trolleybus Saurer in Timisoara.jpg

Yours sincerely, Kobac (talk) 11:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:A68-M Acrob.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A68-M Acrob.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:A68-M Acrob.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Trixt (talk) 22:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ringraziamenti e richiesta[edit]

Ti ringrazio per il lavoro che stai facendo sullo Statuto del 1897. In particolare per aver "scolorato" le illustrazioni, quando hai tempo potresti scolorare anche le altre 4 illustrazioni, così si possono inserire nel testo trascritto? Io non ho un programma adatto sotto mano. Grazie mille, buna giornata. --Accurimbono (talk) 07:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie mille! --Accurimbono (talk) 18:54, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brisighella veduta torre.jpg[edit]

File:Brisighella veduta torre.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 07:03, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brisighella alto.jpg[edit]

File:Brisighella alto.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 07:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altra sede regione Lombardia lug 2009.JPG[edit]

File:Altra sede regione Lombardia lug 2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.167.13 19:13, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Emilio Salgari[edit]

Grazie della correzione. Non so se sei al corrente del progetto "autocompilazione del template Creator", che stiamo sperimendando da it.wikisource ma che sta estendendosi; Emilio Salgari è proprio uno dei template Creator creati semi-automaticamente e la traduzione in inglese del contenuto dei campi Attività di it.wikipedia è un tassello che ancora manca. In vari casi, tutto il ressto della compilazione è automatica, sulla base dei dati "risucchiati" dal template Bio della pagina di wikipedia. --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 10:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ancora sul Sud Tirolo/Alto Adige[edit]

Ciao! Credo che questa discussione potrebbe interessare anche a te, mi piacerebbe sapere la tua opinione! :-) -- Vonvikken (talk) 23:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Luigi Chiesa,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 18:15, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, could you help me? :)[edit]

Hi, I'm Ranking Update from English Wikipedia, I've already seen some of your work like this.. Could you help me to create one like that for ASEAN Football Championship Champions template?? :) Here I have some picture for revision. — иz нίpнόp 08:12, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	Very perfect !! :) Thank you so much Luigi Chiesa for your help, it is my pleasure to award you this barnstar.. :) — иz нίpнόp 16:55, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Monument of Nizami Ganjavi[edit]

Buongiorno, Luigi. I'm user from Azerbaijan. The last year in your city, in your beautiful city was erected a monument of a very famous Azerbaijani poet Nizami Ganjavi. This monument was erected in Villa Borghese park (in Viale Madama Letizia). Could you make a photo of this monument and upload it to the Commons? Grazie per il vostro tempo)) --Interfase (talk) 16:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Der standhafte Zinnsoldat.jpg[edit]

File:Der standhafte Zinnsoldat.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Yellowcard (talk) 17:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Der standhafte Zinnsoldat.jpg[edit]

File:Der standhafte Zinnsoldat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Somali air force.svg[edit]

File:Flag of Somali air force.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 18:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Commemorative plate of Lithuanian King Mindaugas.JPG

Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:54, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SNGCop 039.jpg[edit]

File:SNGCop 039.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:59, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Epirus238bc.jpg[edit]

File:Epirus238bc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:46, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Luigi Chiesa,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Luigi Chiesa,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

File:Metro Napoli-Arcobaleno.png[edit]

File:Metro Napoli-Arcobaleno.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 14:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

⧼Wikibase-terms/Luigi Chiesa⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Luigi Chiesa,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Circoscrizioni di BG 2009.svg[edit]

File:Circoscrizioni di BG 2009.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Friedrichstrasse (talk) 08:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Stazione di Catanzaro.jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 00:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RICHIESTA FOTO SOAP BOX RALLY EDIZIONE XII - 1978[edit]

Buongiorno sig. Luigi Chiesa, ho visto le sue foto scattate al XII Soap Box Rally del 1978. Io ho partecipato con un amico ed avevamo l'automobilina intitolata a "Braccio di Ferro e Olivia" e mi piacerebbe avere qualche foto se lei le ha scattate. P.f. mi faccia sapere. Valter e-mail:*********@libero.it

Photo requests[edit]

Hi! Do you do photo requests in Italy? WhisperToMe (talk) 10:04, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! I also want to list en:Japanese School of Rome and en:Japanese School of Milan but they do not yet have articles on the Italian Wikipedia WhisperToMe (talk) 11:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ritratto di Gian Giorgio Trissino[edit]

Buongiorno, vedo nella relativa scheda che lei ha caricato l'immagine in oggetto, mettendo come attuale ubicazione il Teatro Olimpico di Vicenza. Più spesso trovo indicato che questo quadro è al Louvre. Può confermare la sua affermazione? Sa per caso se esistono più versioni del medesimo ritratto? Per esempio ce n'è un'altra molto simile sempre di V. Catena, del 1525, attualmente presso la Civica Pinacoteca di Como, che differisce da questo principalmente per l'iscrizione GEORG·TRISSINUS posta in alto. Grazie mille. --GeorgesB (talk) 09:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

AHeneen (talk) 08:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizzazione automatica da CropTool[edit]

Vedo un (corretto) spostamento massiccio di categorie nelle immagini prodotte con CropTool. Bisognerebbe suggerire all'autore User:Danmichaelo qualche modifica del tool per generare categorie corrette o sopprimere quelle inesatte. Come si potrebbe fare? --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 23:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Portable Antiquities Scheme[edit]

Hi, I can see you've used or uploaded some of these photographs in the past, so you may be interested in an early heads-up that I have started uploading all photographs from the Portable Antiquities Scheme, which should be around 400,000 photographs of archaeologically interesting artefacts, found by the public in England and Wales. It will take a few weeks to finish, I expect. I tweeted about it yesterday here and you can find the project page along with GLAM reports and other links like useful searches of the collection here. Cheers --Fæ (talk) 12:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cyclobutadiene structure.svg[edit]

File:Cyclobutadiene structure.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 02:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Pallone d'oro.svg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 08:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili[edit]

Gentile Luigi Chiesa, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso![edit]

English | Italiano | +/−

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Azines[edit]

Azines has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 05:02, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Black_tie[edit]

Black tie has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sanandros (talk) 05:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Illustrations_from_books_in_italian[edit]

Illustrations from books in italian has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 11:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images_with_rulers_to_indicate_scale[edit]

Images with rulers to indicate scale has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

— wqnvlz (talk · contribs) 07:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Melamine.svg

Yours sincerely, DMacks (talk) 04:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]