User talk:Lupo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Running 1.42.0-wmf.21 (f935ccf)

Older talk is in the archive.

Commons maintenance announcements [+/−]

More translations are needed for:


Backlogs:
as of 18 February 2010

Lupo hi.

for some inexplicable reason, in the hebrew translation, the "engine_names" happen to be in Greek, which is, as they say, Greek to me.

could you please change the translation as here?

if (window.HotCat) $.extend(window.HotCat.engine_names, {
    searchindex : 'חיפוש'
   ,pagelist    : 'רשימת דפים'
   ,combined    : 'חיפוש מורכב'
   ,subcat      : 'תת קטגוריות'
   ,parentcat   : 'קטגוריות אב'
  });

(not that i understand what is the difference between "search" and "combined", or why is it good to have "pagelist" in this gadget)...

while you are at it, you might want to change

 HotCat.multi_tooltip = 'עריכת מספר קטגוריות';

and

HotCat.messages.multi_error =  'למרבה הצער ארעה תקלה, והשינויים שביצעת לא נשמרו. אתך הסליחה.';

thanks a bunch, peace - קיפודנחש (talk) 23:06, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No idea why there was Greek text there. Might have been a copy-paste error. Nor do I know why nobody noticed that for so long. ✓ Done now. Thanks a lot for your help! Lupo 06:04, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at enwiki Village Pump[edit]

There's a discussion at en:Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Section links not working properly that would benefit from your contribution. It looks like there might be a conflict between HotCat at en:Wikipedia:WikEd which is causing some unusual behaviour when section links are clicked on. Thanks. Nthep (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pointer; I've replied there. Lupo 22:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

I'm new and so I must apologise about the copyrighted images. I'm confused as the images I've used are from Flickr, and the individual has given consent for the image to be used by others as long as he's mentioned which I have done. So can you give me some help and info and why what I have done is a "copyright violation"? And the image: " File:Police Scotland Mounted Branch in Tayside.jpg," I would like deleted. I got the location mixed up (Dundee and not Tayside), and tried to reupload but wouldn't let me and I don't know how to delete the image myself. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by AProudScotsman (talk • contribs) 11:59, 12 May 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

I've replied at your talk page. Lupo 12:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Kudos to you for your work on spotting copyright violations. Best regards Hekerui (talk) 19:36, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's like trying to empty a bathtub using a thimble while the faucet is running. Luckily there are some others keeping an eye out, too. How'd you notice? Lupo 19:43, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I went over files marked as copyright violations and you gave links that name the actual photographers and agencies, and are not some blog post, which made it easy. Often, one has to do a whole other search to clarify whether an image is indeed a copyvio or not. Best regards Hekerui (talk) 09:09, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I try to give good source links that do credit the photo to someone since I know myself how much work actual deletion can be if one takes the trouble to actually follow the given links and is trying to figure out whether the report is valid. Not always possible, though, so sometimes I have to settle for a blog post, too. Blog posts are good, too, if they pre-date the upload here; that at least shows that the image was available elsewhere before the upload. Basically, if something is available on the Internet anywhere shortly after the upload, my first assumption is copyvio. Sometimes, if user names indicate some affiliation with the source found, I go for "no permission" instead. Lupo 09:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You're right of course, I do the same thing. But you gave really good links when you could, hence my thanks :) Hekerui (talk) 09:48, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

Hi, you left a message on my talk page re: copyright violation. I only cropped the original image after a request to do so on my talk page. I actually don't think the image is a decent enough quality even in it's original form ... Sagaciousphil (talk) 15:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I noticed so a little later. Original image is now also tagged. Lupo 15:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I never looked when I cropped it but after receiving your notice I looked in more depth - it does seem the link you gave was uploaded by the same user? If possible I would ask if you would consider removing the template from my talk page as I had acted in good faith and literally just cropped an image that was already on Commons, uploaded by someone I have no knowledge of whatsoever, so I don't feel it's justified for me to be branded as guilty of copyright violation. Sagaciousphil (talk) 16:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As you are an Admin, please rev/del the notice from my talk page as I do not wish it to appear in the history of my talk page. I was not guilty of a copyright violation. Thanks. Sagaciousphil (talk) 16:38, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That would leave nonsense in the history. It's not a stigma. Just archive it, or simply delete the whole section, and be done with it. Lupo 16:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lupo, well, I'm afraid I respectfully disagree - you have incorrectly accused me of copy violation and anyone checking my talk page/archive will think I do not understand copyright. Please rev/del it. Sagaciousphil (talk) 16:57, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lupo, will you not at least have the curtesy of clearly indicating on my talk page that you have been mistaken in your inappropriate and inaccurate accusations? Sagaciousphil (talk) 18:57, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please note further comment on my talk page. Thanks. Sagaciousphil (talk) 20:27, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For me, this is closed. I won't make any further comment on this. Lupo 20:33, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Take it easy. Hekerui (talk) 11:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The posting of that video link is not only offensive but childish; certainly not the behaviour anyone would expect from Administrators. Lupo simply had to remove the erroneous template with a sincere apology once their blatant mistake was pointed out to them. Sagaciousphil (talk) 12:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

Hi Lupo, I saw your warning on User talk:Aytugg. He repeated viol. Thank you.--Ayrıntılı Bilgi (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. Since he drops by infrequently, I've given him a 2 week timeout. Lupo 20:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich rufe dich als Kenner des Urheberrechts an. Kannst du bitte hier einen Blick drauf werfen und eingreifen, falls meine Interpretation grundlegend falsch sein sollte? Anliegen ist die Löschung von Dateien deren Urheberrecht im Ursprungsland noch nicht abgelaufen ist und die - obgleich in einem Massenupload enthalten - auf Commons nicht hätten hochgeladen werden sollen. Ich weiß, auf Commons wird die Interpretation von Recht gerne als demokratischer Prozess misverstanden, weswegen diese Bitte als Falsch interpretiert werden könnte. --Martin H. (talk) 15:27, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich denke, Du hast vollkommen recht. Habe dort mein {{Vd}} hinterlassen. Lupo 15:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

explan[edit]

How are you?you have bloked me for 1 week and the week ends so that the block shoud be removed.second thing is that your block is wrong because i dont read the messsage because i don't read it i now that is not enough to be a cause but i am not an english man and i can't speak english properly And i surf the net from mobile and when i upload a file there is no button in the mobile version for liescince so how can i do this and i know i take the photos from the internet but because the man who i try to upload his image is a famous man in egypt so can you upload any free image for him because i ask you to do this please .thanks in advance---1339861mzb (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@1339861mzb:
Click to see a larger version
Hi there! Please excuse my writing in English; I do not speak your language. The block expired on 17:52, 11 June 2014 (UTC). Since you could edit my talk page and leave me the above message, you're clearly not blocked anymore. If, as you write, there is no way to select a license for a mobile upload, then only upload photos that you have taken yourself. Do not upload screenshots or photographs of other photos, of posters, of DVD covers, of TV screens, or of similar things -- those are copyrighted. Also do not upload images taken from other websites. The only other help I can offer is the image at the right. Lupo 21:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
thank you very very much all i was trying to do is to upload image for mohammad metwalli alsharawi a famous egyptian but because there is no free image for him i will stop downloading photos from internet websites thanks another time--1339861mzb (talk) 14:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
hi lupo how are you i try today to upload my own photos but i cant because my attempts has been failed but i don't know why is that because you blocked me first time even though you remove the block i don't know what is the cause when uploading image it send me a meesage error,try again can you help me and thanks in advance--1339861mzb (talk) 17:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
then i upload two images from desktop version because in mobile version it send me the breveous message but before i have been blocked i was able to uploud from mobile version without problems but now i can't and the two images that i have been uploading themtoday doesn't apear in my museum pleeeeees help me and return me as i was before block i wan't to make commons fill with wree images but i can't now--1339861mzb (talk) 19:06, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Missing messages at Translatewiki?[edit]

There are some system messages at Commons in English that I would like to translate into Croatian, but I can't find them at Translatewiki. For example, tabs "global usage", "find categories", "move", then "request rotation" and "ZoomViewer: flash/no flash". Where are really these messages, am I missing something?--MaGa 11:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These probably come from gadgets. You'd have to look in the respective gadgets how they can be localized. For instance, MediaWiki:Gadget-ZoomViewer.js doesn't look like it could be localized out of the box, the strings are hardcoded. You'll have to prod the people who wrote these gadgets. Lupo 14:12, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks.--MaGa 18:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~ Nahid Talk 18:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm, I've never found out how to use translatewiki for Javascript. I'm eitehr not looking hard enough, or the documentation is well hidden / not existent. --Dschwen (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violation?[edit]

Hi, just see a pic.It says in Tr "This penis belong 12 years old". I guess it is violation. File:12 yaşindaki bir cocugun penisi 2014-06-24 20-21.jpg -Conversation could be awkward sorry---Ayrıntılı Bilgi (talk) 18:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you? or another one . I dont know. It was sth like "Ultimate deletion". Who ever did, thank you.--Ayrıntılı Bilgi (talk) 19:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, that was somebody else. Indeed an ultimate deletion. Actually, I wonder how one does that. Maybe first hide all revisions, then delete the page? Or maybe through the API... Lupo 20:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lupo, you recently deleted this file, as per my suggestion. The uploader, Eliška Fortinová, also has a pretty long history of violating copyright policy, and has already been blocked (briefly) once... This might be an opportunity for a more forceful reprimand, if you think such is appropriate. Just a thought. KDS4444 (talk) 14:47, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic[edit]

Hi. Are Creative Commons images with the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license allowed to be used on Wiki?

Tbone556 (talk) 16:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbone556: : No. Only CC-0, CC-BY and CC-BY-SA, all versions. NC or ND are not free enough for the Commons. BTW, please upload crops as separate files under a new name. We don't overwrite files with different ones, unless the modification is really minor. Your crops are pretty heavy. Maybe even good, but still drastic changes from the original. So just upload under a new name (and then change the image link in the article). Lupo 16:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the information. Cheers!

Tbone556 (talk) 16:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Klaus-johannis-560x778.jpg[edit]

Hi. Please help me understand why this file was deleted and please tell me how to upload it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchGabriel33 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 13 August 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

@ArchGabriel33: Hi. The file was deleted because it appeared to be a copyright violation. It was already published at http://www.klausjohannis.ro/ and that site does not specify any free license for that image but instead clearly says "© 2008-2012, Klaus Iohannis, All Rights Reserved".
If you are the owner of the copyrights on that image, follow the process explained at COM:OTRS and send a formal release for the picture. The release should come from a verifiable e-mail address. Alternatively, contact Mr. Iohannis and make him include a statement on his page that this image was licensed freely, for instance as {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Lupo 07:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Lupo: That image is all over the internet. It also appears on Facebook and o large number of public newspapers. Please take a look. And the copyright "© 2008-2012, Klaus Iohannis, All Rights Reserved" is for the webpage, not for the image, that's why the image is public.
It doesn't matter that it was copied to numerous other websites. Unless there is a clear and reliable indication (by the copyright owner) of a free license, it's not freely licensed and must not be uploaded here. Lupo 08:19, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Lupo: I understand. So is there no chance to post that photo on Wikipedia? Because I don't have any contact with Klaus Iohannis nor with his photographer (who's name is not even known). I really want to replace the terrible photo from that article. Please help me with this. My intentions are far from creating any legal issues, but rather of helping Wikipedia. --ArchGabriel33 (talk) 19:45, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, in that case there's no chance to upload this photo here at the Commons. Perhaps some Wikipedian can take a better photo of him at one of his public appearances. Lupo 20:02, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Diligence
Awarded for the critical examination of source information concerning The Official Portrait of Haile Selassie I Czar Petar I (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I've closed the DR and moved the file to File:Haile Selassie in full dress.jpg. Lupo 19:33, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
I hereby award you the The Barnstar of Diplomacy for your level-headed, reasonable and tireless negotiation efforts with the Foundation's mobile team about their statistics and for professional transportation of Wikimedia Common's interests to those team members. Rillke(q?) 19:02, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I try... but it's not over yet. There's still some patches that should be deployed and have some effect, and if not, I'll have to take them up on their promise to take it down until they have come up with a better idea to structure that process/workflow to get a better useful-uploads ratio.
I just hope they don't repeat the same mistakes with their plans for desktop uploading. That looks on first glance as if they wanted to make the upload wizard more mobile-like... which would be bad. (Also, I only see user stories/use cases about what they want to support. I see nothing about use cases they want to prevent. Neglecting those is the biggest problem with Mobile/Web uploads.) Lupo 19:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Lupo, könntest du bei der Datei bitte die erste Version löschen. Das Original von der ÖNB braucht es hier nicht und die Reproduktion ohne die Scan-Farbskala ist dann auch definitiv PD-old-100. Danke --тнояsтеn 21:06, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, obwohl ich kaum glaube, dass diese Farbskala urheberrechtlich geschützt sein könnte. Lupo 21:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ich auch nicht ;) Aber schöner ists so. Danke! --тнояsтеn 22:06, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aus aktuellem Anlass (COM:FORUM#Nutzung Historischer Karten als Screenshot aus dem BayernAtlas gezogen) hätte ich nochmal eine Versionslöschungs-Bitte: File:Augsburg - Rathaus, Ludwigsplatz - 19. Jahrhundert.tif. Die erste Version erhält ein Wasserzeichen. Danke. --тнояsтеn 17:44, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Auch erledigt. Wieso ist das eigentlich eine TIFF-Datei? Der Stadtplan wird sowieso als JPG gesendet (256x256px grosse Kacheln). Lupo 19:54, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Danke. Das hab ich mich beim Zuschneiden auch gefragt. Ich weiß es ehrlich gesagt nicht mehr... --тнояsтеn 20:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Admin's Barnstar
Awarded for assisting in the successful upload of File:Haile Selassie in full dress.jpg "If each and everyone endeavors to cooperate and work in as much as his capacity permits, our faith rests upon the Almighty God that he would bless the results for us" - His Majesty Emperor Haile Selassie I Czar Petar I (talk) 22:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, thank you for taking the time to rename the file appropriately, truly appreciated.

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Reliable Deletionism
I've seen a steady stream of perfect DRs from you lately. These are the easiest for me to close. It's good to work with someone who knows exactly what they're doing, so I thought I'd say a quick thanks. INeverCry 01:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! The only problem is that there are many more to come. There are some 16,000 files to check. :-( Lupo 11:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And then 300,000+ to check after that... INeverCry 19:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flinfo kann keine Bilder mehr von der Mushroom Observer-Seite herunterladen[edit]

Hi Lupo, seit einiger Zeit kann ich mit Flinfo keine Bilder mehr von der Mushroom Observer-Seite herunterzuladen. Als Fehlermeldung erhalte ich nur: "Bild-ID kann nicht berechnet werden aus der Eingabe xyz". Das Herunterladen von Bildern von Flickr funktioniert nach wie vor. Daher gehe ich davon aus, dass es irgendwelche Umstellungen auf der Mushroom Observer-Seite gegeben hat. Ich hoffe sehr, dass du mir helfen kannst oder du mir zumindest sagen kannst, an wen ich mich mit meinem Problem wenden kann. Es wäre wirklich mehr als schade, wenn dieses tolle Tool nicht mehr betreut würde. (meine Anfrage auf der Kontaktseite des Tools blieb bisher unbeantwortet, da Benutzer Flominator sich wohl eine Auszeit genommen hat.(was ihm natürlich gegönnt sei!)) Herzliche Grüße --217.229.208.102 07:52, 9 October 2014 (UTC) --Thkgk (talk) 16:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Das hatte ich ferienhalber auch nicht gesehen. Ja, die haben wieder einmal ihr HTML geändert. Flinfo ist nun angepasst; sollte wieder gehen. (Übrigens, das "Kontakt"-Link in Flinfo selbst geht hierher nach Commons. Da sind die Chancen, dass ich das sehe, ein wenig besser.) Lupo 23:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Super, es funktioniert wieder! Herzlichen Dank!!! Du bist der Größte! --Thkgk (talk) 10:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Is possible to rename all files automatically in this category [1] without requesting a rename for all pictures individually? All pictures are taken and uploaded by me, but with wrong file names (e.g. Arboretum Vinica (xx).jpg should be Arboretum Opeka (xx).jpg).--MaGa 16:57, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if there is a mass rename tool somewhere. Lupo 11:32, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe some of your colleagues or file movers can do it, or mass rename is not possible at all?--MaGa 16:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PD-old and US publication[edit]

Hi Lupo; sorry to bother you, but it seems there's no one who feels like stating an opinion regarding my question, so I thought maybe you could add something there...? Gestumblindi (talk) 00:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My thanks[edit]

Hi Lupo, Thankyou for identifying and categorising the recent car run photographs I uploaded its much appreciated Gnangarra 06:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome; the pleasure was mine. Such beautiful cars! Lupo 20:46, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Awesome Scale[edit]

I give you a 10 out of 10. :) I thought that this was very thoughtful. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploadformular[edit]

Hallo Lupo,
User Rillke hat auf meine Frage, warum beim Hochladen mehrerer Bilder ab dem zweiten nur das einfache Formular angeboten wird, hier geantwortet "Der Code für das "bessere Hochladeformular" ist alt und klapprig. Damals von Lupo geschrieben, hat es über Jahre keine Updates mehr erfahren. Wir haben ja stattdessen den Wizard und mit dem werden ja schließlich 70 bis 90% aller Dateien hochgeladen."
Ich finde dennoch dein Formular besser. Könntest du es bitte wieder zum stabilen Funktionieren bringen?
Mit freundlichem Gruß --Geisler Martin (talk) 17:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rillke hat schon recht. Dass da überhaupt noch etwas funktioniert grenzt an ein kleines Wunder.
Vielleicht habe ich tatsächlich über den Jahreswechsel ein wenig Zeit, 'mal danach zu schauen. Es wäre mir aber schon geholfen, wenn ich nicht raten müsste, was genau Du denn beobachtest. Kannst Du mir das bitte genau beschreiben, oder ein Video davon irgendwo hochladen? Z.B.: welche Version welchen Browsers verwendest Du, auf welchem Betriebssystem? Was genau machst Du, um nach erfolgtem erstem Upload erneut zum Formular zu kommen: gehst Du via die Browser-Historie zurück? Oder klickst Du erneut ein "Hochladen"-Link an? Öffnest Du das "zweite" Formular in einem neuen Tab? Siehst Du auf dem einfachen Formular wenigstens auch den "Vorschau"-Knopf? Wie genau lautet die URL in der Addresszeile, wenn Du beim zweiten Mal nur das einfache Formular siehst? Meldet Dein Browser irgendwelche Fehlermeldungen in seiner Fehlerkonsole, die so aussehen, als hätten sie etwas mit Javascript zu tun? Wenn ja, was ist der Inhalt dieser Fehlermeldungen?
Wenn ich zumindest weiss, was genau Du machst, kann ich versuchen, das hier bei mir zu reproduzieren. Wenn's dann bei mir auch auftritt, kann ich der Sache nachgehen. Andernfalls kann ich da leider nicht viel machen.
Lupo 23:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ich verwende Firefox 34.0.5 unter Windows 7 professional und rufe für jedes Bild das Formular mit "Datei hochladen" in einem neuen Fenster auf. Der Fehler mit dem einfachen Formular tritt nach Umfrage bei einem Wikipedia-Stammtisch auch bei anderen Anwendern auf. Er kommt meist beim zweiten Bild, manchmal auch später. Wenn er auftritt wird dennoch angezeigt: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang=de. Das einfache Formular ist dann ohne Vorschauknopf. Manchmal hat es schon geklappt, dass ich ohne etwas im einfachen Formular auszufüllen auf Hochladen gedrückt habe, und das erweiterte Formular erschien, jetzt unter der Anzeige https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload. Irgendwelche Fehlermeldungen treten nicht auf. --Geisler Martin (talk) 13:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Und von wo kommst Du überhaupt auf das Formular? Via Commons:Hochladen, "Das Standardformular hat keine Vorauswahl."? Oder sonstwie? Lupo 17:20, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Über "Commons:Hochladen" (B): "Es ist ausschließlich meine eigene Arbeit." oder "Es stammt von woanders." --Geisler Martin (talk) 21:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done sollte behoben sein. Wenn Du einmal auf Special:Upload gehst und dann dort Deinen Browser-Cache neu lädst, sollte das nicht mehr vorkommen. Lupo 13:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alles bestens. Danke. --Geisler Martin (talk) 15:31, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Ipernity review needed has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josve05a (talk) 14:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More potential IAC problems[edit]

Hi Lupo, pinging also HJ Mitchell and Steinsplitter. Re the fall-out from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Indiaresists and the subsequent blocking of that editor, could you take a look at:

Best, Voceditenore (talk) 10:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • 16:56, 8 January 2015 Steinsplitter (talk | contribs | block) blocked Snickerty03 (talk | contribs) with an expiry time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Abusing multiple accounts) (unblock | change block)
  • 16:54, 8 January 2015 Steinsplitter (talk | contribs | block) blocked 122.162.72.239 (talk) with an expiry time of 1 week (account creation blocked) (Abusing multiple accounts) (unblock | change block)
  • 16:51, 8 January 2015 Steinsplitter (talk | contribs | block) blocked 122.162.71.106 (talk) with an expiry time of 1 week (account creation blocked) (Abusing multiple accounts) (unblock | change block)
  • 16:00, 8 January 2015 Steinsplitter (talk | contribs | block) blocked Piplilive2020 (talk | contribs) with an expiry time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Abusing multiple accounts) (unblock | change block)
^^ @Voceditenore: --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Steinsplitter. I've also commented on the DRs. Lupo 19:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Urheber[edit]

Guten Tag Lupo, in Bezug auf die von mir gemalten Personen möchte ich Folgendes ergänzen: Die Fotos von folgenden Personen wurden mir persönlich zur Verfügung gestellt, um sie für die wikipedia zu malen, die schriftlichen Einwilligungen vor: -Sir Bernard Katz (von Nick Sinclair) -Prof. W. Hartmann (persönlich) -Addie Jacobi (von Michael Teuchert) -Gottfried Müller (von Michael Teuchert) Siehe auch unter Teucofilm: Youtube Gottfried Müller- 90. Geburtstag

Als Malerin und Fotografin habe ich ein sehr gutes bildliches Gedächtnis und nehme Fotos (auch die von mir selbst gemachten) nur als Gedankenstütze.

Vielen Dank für die Bearbeitung

LG aus Chemnitz --Dr.BenitaMartin 07:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

"für Wikipedia" für sich alleine ist keine ausreichende Genehmigung; und wenn tatsächlich schriftliche Genehmigungen der Rechteinhaber an den Fotos vorliegen, können diese ja noch nachgereicht werden, falls nicht schon geschehen. Lupo 10:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Habe die Fotofreigaben der entsprechenden Fotografen Reinhard Kraasch von der Wikipedia-Permissionsabteilung geschickt.

"Vom TV" bleibt dann nur noch Ireen Sheer und diese Künstlerin habe ich im EMC Stollberg zur MDR live Silvesterparty selbst fotografiert. Ich habe dort mehrfach meine ADA Bilder ausgestellt. Siehe Picasa Benita Martin (link geht hier leider nicht- ist aber auf meiner hp) Und im Übrigen, wie ich schon an anderer Stelle in der Wikipedia formuliert habe, ich kann dieser Enzyklopädie nur anbieten. Was fairerweise übernommen und eingestellt wird, entscheiden die Wikipedianer selbst und nicht ich. Meine Bilder zeichnen sich in jedem Fall als selbst angefertigte, realitätsgetreue eigenständige Werke aus. Danke für die Bearbeitung Benita Martin (leider vom handy und ohne Signum Sorry)

Keine Ahnung wer Reinhard Kraasch ist; die korrekte E-mail-Adresse ist permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Dass Ireen Sheer von einem selbstgemachten Foto abgezeichnet wurde, lässet sich ja einfach genug glaubhaft machen indem dieses Originalfoto inkl. Metadaten und evtl. vorhandener am gleichen Anlass kurz vorher oder nachher gemachter Fotos ebenfalls an diese E-Mail-Adresse gesedet werden. Lupo 11:32, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen Lupo, als erstes möchte ich deutlich bemerken: Es ist für mich als Malerin überhaupt nicht unerheblich, ob ich die Person, die ich male, persönlich kenne, oder nicht. Besonders realitätsgetreuen Ausdruck bekomme ich in die Gesichter, in ihre Augen, erfasse ihre Aura, wenn ich die Menschen dazu selbst gesehen habe, vielleicht Kontakt hatte. Da fühle ich mich als Künstlerin von Dir frontal angegriffen. Nun ist es aber so, dass ich oft Aufträge bekomme, die Person "als Kind" zu zeichnen, oder Verstorbene, die dann mir nicht in diesem Alter bekannt sein KÖNNEN. Dann muss ich von Fotos "abmalen". Meine Vorgehensweise als Malerin ist die Folgende: 1. Ein Funke springt über. Bei Veranstaltungen, oder aus Sympathie überhaupt, oder eben als Auftrag. 2.Dann die Entscheidung, die Person zu malen. 3. Ich zeichne high life. Wenn Zeit ist und ich die Materialien dabei habe. 4. Oder ich mache mir ein handy Foto als Erinnerungsstütze. Wer sitzt in der heutigen Zeit noch stundenlang Modell? 5. Im Atelier dann nehme ich mein handy, vergrößere das Display und überlege den "touch": Ist die Person zart? Oder derb, grobschlächtig? Wild? Oder schlau? Danach wähle ich die Acrylfarben aus. Oder Kohle. Oder nur Bleistift- bei Babies. 5. Dann male ich. Die Fotos werden danach für mich uninteressant. Lupo. Ich frage Dich. Wer hat noch seine handyfotos von seinem handy von vor 3-10 Jahren??? Es tut mir leid, damit kann ich der Wikipedia nicht dienen.

Lupo, ich kann Die auch ein Foto 1:1 abzeichnen: Schwarz weiß, oder bunte, wie eine Kopie. Meine Bilder aber zeichnen sich durch abstrakte Striche aus, verwischt, oder mit Wasser weich auslaufend. Lege ein Bild von mir neben ein Foto. Es ist gänzlich anders. Und doch fängt es den Ausdruck ein. Fokussiert auf die Aura des Porträtierten.

Die Wikipedia als Enzyklopädie sieht das vielleicht anders, das verstehe ich. Und die Wikipedianer müssen nun entscheiden. Wollen sie zur Verbesserung ihrer Artikel gemalte Bilder? Ich wurde sogar von Wikipedianern gelobt für die Zeichnungen "im Sinne der Verbesserung der Enzyklopädie". Wenn ja. Von mir? Oder nicht. Stimmt doch einfach ab ... LG aus Chemnitz --89.246.180.193 06:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Ach ja ich muss noch meinen Beitrag von eben signieren Benita Martin --89.246.180.193 06:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lupo,

Regarding to the file deleted above (now her). Doesn't it qualify under {{PD-Gutenberg}}? -- Geagea (talk) 02:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-Gutenberg}} alone is not enough to keep this here. This book is only PD in the U.S. In the source country (the UK) and in fact in the whole European Union and in other countries with a copyright term of 70 years p.m.a. (after the author's death), this is still copyrighted. The author of the map died in 1959, so this will enter the public domain in these countries on January 1, 2030. Lupo 05:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So en.wiki consider as USA wiki? I mean, there are English speakers also in Australia, South Africa etc. But if we talking about servers locations (USA) or wikimedia foundation location (USA), then it is the same for Commons. -- Geagea (talk) 00:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, en-WP cares only about U.S. law. Here at the Commons we require that media be okay under U.S. law and under the law of the source country. Lupo 07:52, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Lupo. -- Geagea (talk) 04:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lupo, do we still need this creator page? No links to it and his works are far from being in the public domain. Came across is while fixing templates with problems. Multichill (talk) 06:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that's still needed. First, his works will become PD at some point in time. Second, it's a record of my tracking down some rather obscure photographers. I was looking for somebody else and found info about this and a few other photographers, so I created these pages. Makes it much easier to re-discover the info if it's ever needed again. I see no reason to remove such entries; if we do, then somebody else will have to redo the research in the future, and it won't get easier some decades from now. However, if these creator entries do have categories, these should probably be tagged with {{No uploads}} or, if we go by the statement on that template page, the categories should be deleted. Lupo 08:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ImageAnnotation - Bildnotizen[edit]

Hi Lupo,
Could you probably help me concerning my problem with ImageAnnotations, like I described here? I was convinced I tried everything, but... If it works I would like to do it for all communities of the Arrondissement Louhans. Thank you --H.p.frei (talk) 23:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Siehe meine Antwort dort. Lupo 10:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

flinfo -- git[edit]

Wenn ich auf https://gitorious.org/flinfo gehe, steht oben dass die Seite ab Mai nicht mehr verfuegbar ist. Wird das git repo dann irgendwo anders verfuegbar sein? --McZusatz (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Na super. Die hätten ja wenigstens 'mal 'ne E-Mail schicken können. Dann halt nun da: https://gitlab.com/flinfo/flinfo . Wenigstens sind die auch in Europa. Danke für den Hinweis, das hätte ich sonst komplett verpasst. Lupo 21:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Lupo,
könntest Du bitte diese aktuelle Version einsetzen:
w:frr:MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js/frr
Mit Dank im Voraus, --Murma174 (talk) 23:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Lupo 12:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Thank you. --Murma174 (talk) 14:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Lupo,
könntest Du bitte diese aktuelle Version einsetzen:
w:ur:MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js/ur
Mit Dank im Voraus,--Obaid Raza (talk) 17:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Lupo 21:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
please rewrite from this page w:ur:MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js/ur، i modify page w:ur:MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js--Obaid Raza (talk) 23:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Lupo 19:49, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hotcat-bug[edit]

in urdu wiki pedia hotcat bug [6]. hotcat removed curly Brackets in all templates.--Obaid Raza (talk) 17:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No idea why it would do that. Lupo 21:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flinfo: Kein Import mehr von MushroomObserver.org möglich[edit]

Hallo Lupo, auf MushroomObserver.org wurden neben der Benutzeroberfläche auch Änderungen "unter der Haube" vorgenommen, sodass jetzt kein Import mehr mit Flinfo möglich ist. Zuvor trat bereits der Fehler auf, dass Flinfo bestehende Kategorien auf Commons nicht mehr erkannte. Könntest Du das Tool bitte anpassen? Danke im Voraus. --Ak ccm (talk) 10:09, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Das mit den Kategorien ist schon behoben. Flinfo an die erneuten Änderungen auf mushroomobserver.org anzupassen kann eine Weile dauern; die Änderungen sind diesmal ziemlich substantiell. Lupo 15:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Sollte wieder gehen. Wenn Du noch irgendwelche Probleme bemerkst, einfach melden. Lupo 20:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Muchas gracias! --Ak ccm (talk) 07:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hilfe (Richiesta di aiuto per traduzione)[edit]

Salve Lupo, ho visto in questa categoria che parli tedesco, mi rivolgo a te per una richiesta di aiuto per traduzione in tedesco, potresti per favore aggiustare questa pagina? I contenuti già ci sono devono solo essere sistemati, pensi di riuscirci? Nell'attesa, fiducioso, ringrazio anticipatamente e saluto cordialmente Smitersleon (talk) 15:20, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Lupo, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship[edit]

Hi Lupo, you have probably noticed it already, but just to make sure: a Wikimedia steward removed your admin privileges here on Commons earlier today, and as you are an experienced editor, I added you to the autopatrolled user group instead. Thank you for the many years of service as an administrator, and I hope you will stay active on Commons as a regular contributor. Of course, please do feel free to re-apply for adminship if you have more time :-) Thanks again, and all the best, odder (talk) 19:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Schade. Danke für deine Arbeit auf Commons. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Auch von mir herzlichen Dank! --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Kann ich dich zu HotCat und ImageAnnotator Fragen weiterhin konsultieren? Du hast diese Gadgets und deren Abhängigkeiten super dokumentiert (das habe ich nie geschafft), aber ich denke es ist immer besser, der Ersteller schaut über die Änderungen. Vielen Dank, auch für deine kompetenten Antworten im Bereich Urheberrecht. -- Rillke(q?) 16:13, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flinfo: Umstellung im Dateinamen beim Import von Mushroom Observer möglich?[edit]

Hallo Lupo, wäre es möglich, dass bei künftigen Importen von MushroomObserver.org das Datum vom Anfang des Dateinamens ans Ende desselbigen positioniert wird? Dadurch werden die Pilzfotos in Kategorien automatisch nach dem wissenschaftlichen Namen sortiert. Würde mich freuen, wenn Du diese Anpassung vornehmen könntest. Ich ärgere mich, dass ich den Vorteil nicht schon früher erkannt habe. --Ak ccm (talk) 15:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Images from external sources with admin-reviewed licenses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josve05a (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator/de has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Joachim Lutz (talk) 21:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator/de has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WorldMustFashion (talk) 09:58, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Works_possibly_copyrighted_in_the_U.S._(19th_century) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


47.150.89.223 21:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please merge[edit]

This change to flinfo. :) (tJosve05a (c) 23:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Thanks! Lupo 10:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Works of Simon Fieldhouse[edit]

Hi,

Ten years ago (!), you helped User:Simonfieldhouse on en.wikipedia with the upload of his works. Now, ten years later, another user has started to request the deletion of the works from en.wikipedia and is beginning to request deletion from Commons. You may be interested to give an opinion, or to just follow the discussion, at Commons:Deletion requests/File:T S Eliot Simon Fieldhouse.jpg. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oof. I'll have to check if I still have the e-mail exchange from back then (if there was one at all; don't remember off-hand) to see why in 2006 I did not question the identity of the en-WP user account. There must've been something that made it obvious to me that the en-WP user indeed was the artist. In later years I would've pointed the user to OTRS, but 2006 was well before we had OTRS I think. Lupo 09:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately my e-mail archive regarding Wikipedia issues only goes back to September 2007. So if the Commons community feels there should be an OTRS confirmation, it's best if someone just contacts Simon by e-mail. His e-mail address is given on his web site. Lupo 16:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for looking in your personal archives. Just in case, did you also look if there may have been something useful in the deleted userpage en:User:Simonfieldhouse? -- Asclepias (talk) 20:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There wasn't. It was created by another user by accident. Took 4 years for someone to notice and delete it again. Simon himself never edited his own user page. Lupo 16:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Louvre at night centered.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grand-Duc (talk) 23:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 22:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extension:FileAnnotations[edit]

Hi Lupo, this could be interesting for you if you are not already aware of it. Maybe you could give some valuable input from your experience with Gadget-ImageAnnotator. Ciao, --Arnd (talk) 11:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

restore files[edit]

Hi, Mr. LUPO, I am writing to ask you if you could restore some PD files while keeping a recently blocked user, I had tried to do some bugs at the COM: UDR, but without many results, I would ask her if they could do something for some recovery:

--87.14.89.82 15:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.245.76.230 (talk) 01:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist nur unser Vandale aus Norditalien A3cb1. LG, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source of Date of Charles Barenne[edit]

Hallo Lupo, du warst derjenige, der in der Datei "Arthur Augustus Zimmerman" das Geburtsdatum (und die Aktivzeit) des Fotografen Barenne hinzugefügt hat. Ich habe sorgfältig recherchiert und als Todeszeitpunkt 1913 (Anfang, spätest. Februar) herausgefunden, aber kein Geburtsjahr. Nur auf einer nicht sehr zuverlässigen Webseite gab es das Geburtsjahr auch, leider ebenfalls ohne Quelle. Es ist sicherlich schon eine Weile her. Doch ist man bei Recherchen meist auf den gleichen Pfaden unterwegs. Woher stammt die Angabe für das Geburtsjahr? Dank dir für die Antwort --Tozina (talk) 14:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, weiss ich nicht mehr. Aber eine kurze Suche im Katalog der Bibliothèque Nationale Française liefert [7], und obwohl irgendetwas mit den direkten Links dort für mich schief läuft, findet Google nach "Charles Amédée Barenne" den vollen BNF-Eintrag.[8]. Geboren am 5. Nov. 1835 in Auxerre, gestorben am 2. Feb. 1913 in Paris. Lupo 14:45, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Creator:Charles Barenne created. Lupo 14:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese text[edit]

Lupo, como o meu inglês é pífio, vou falar em português mesmo; na versão lusófona da Esplanada um editor solicitou a correção do texto em MediaWiki:ImageAnnotatorAddButtonText/pt-br; lá está: "Adicione uma nota", ele pede para que seja "Adicionar uma nota", o mesmo valendo para a versão em português de Portugal, em MediaWiki:ImageAnnotatorAddButtonText/pt.

Como a página está protegida para editores normais como eu, se puder corrigir, agradecemos. Cordialmente, André Koehne TALK TO ME 19:19, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not an administrator anymore, and I cannot edit these pages either. Lupo 22:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lupo,

The script you have created is unfortunately not working properly. I am unable to use the quick delete buttons with Gallery Details while the actions above work fine, I was wondering if you had the time, to look over the script and see what needs to be fixed. An interface admin attempted to fix the issue, but it just takes me to the deletion page instead of the quick deletion action similar to the DR gadget. You can comment on it here if you’d like. -- 1989 (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I notified for the deletion of some user talk page? Lupo 19:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js (findCreator:) asks the API who the first user in the revision history is. However, this looks like a manual edit by Jeff G.. Perhaps just some confusion while multiple tabs were open? -- Rillke(q?) 14:43, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You created the page, although it didn't show up until very recently due to a bug detailed at Phab:T173070. Standard practice is to notify page creators when pages are nominated for any sort of deletion. See also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 74#Few pages needs to be cleaned up after maintenance. CC Rillke.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 23:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Casa old.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:53, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PD-Morocco[edit]

Thanks for your explanations. The license tag wasn't very clear for the old photographs.

This image was first published in Morocco and is now in the public domain because its term of copyright has expired under Moroccan Law, amended 2006 (details). This work meets either of the following conditions:

  • This is an anonymous work or pseudonymous work and 70 years have passed since the date of its publication (or creation, if not published within 50 years).
  • This is a collective or audiovisual work and 70 years have passed since the year of its publication (or creation, if not published within 70 years).
  • This is a work of applied art and 70 years have passed since the date of its publication (or creation, if not published within 50 years).
  • This is another type of work and 70 years have passed since the year of the author's death.

The pre-2006 version (This is a photographic or cinematographic work and fifty years have passed since the year of its production.) shoud be mentionned somewhere in the tag.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 22:09, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. See Template talk:PD-Morocco. Lupo 11:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-mediawiki-editnotice has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this interface page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 06:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full source images of Wivern (PSF)[edit]

Based on this image:

PSF-W1040009

, you can see that Wivern (PSF) (see middle bottom) is now cropped to half , do you know where to get the full uncut source images ?

Requested by Encik Tekateki (talk) 03:14, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't know. Maybe contact the uploader, or the WMF. Perhaps they still have the original boxes of illustrations? Lupo 15:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Kampf, jetzt PD[edit]

Hi Lupo, vor vielen Monden hast du ein Bild von ebay für wp gesichert: w:File:Arthur Kampf Volksopfer 1813.jpg. 12 Jahre hat es gedauert, aber jetzt ist es soweit. Magst Du es zurückholen? Ich hätte es selbst gemacht, aber ich habe vergessen wie das geht. Guten Rutsch, Mutter Erde (talk) 08:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Xylographers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jan Kameníček (talk) 20:14, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ydd has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]