User talk:MX8

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Milad A380!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, MX8!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bearbeitung[edit]

Hi!
Ich habe ein Bild von dir bearbeitet, und hoffe, dass es dir so gefällt. Außerdem war die Reg nicht ganz richtig abgelesen. ;)

Grüße, abf «Cabale!» 15:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gefällt mir und der Grund für die falsche Registration war die davorstehende Tragfläche--Milad A380 (talk) 15:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Achja! Was war denn dein Bearbeitungs-Programm? Hab noch mehr Bilder, bei denen sowas sinnvoll wäre.--Milad A380 (talk) 15:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich benutze "The GIMP". Ich habe noch dieses, dieses und dieses (übrigens KEIN A318, sondern ein A319) "notdürftig" geflickt. ;) Grüße, abf «Cabale!» 16:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stimmt, war nur son A318-Reflex(bin 3mal nach paris mit AF geflogen,3mal wars ne A318)--Milad A380 (talk) 17:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, das kenne ich. Wenn man AF in Deutschland sieht, denkt man allgemein "A318", im ersten Moment. ;) abf «Cabale!» 17:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dieses habe ich auch noch "notdürftig" geflickt, ist übrigens eine MD-87, keine 82er. abf «Cabale!» 17:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab jezt auch so n Programm, Photo Scape.Ich werd gleich ne menge Bilder, die Vorher viel zu klein warn hochladen--Milad A380 (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Versuch' doch einfach, symmetrischer als z.B. so 'was zu schneiden, das sieht einfach nicht aus. ;) Wenn du richtig gute Bilder von Flugzeugen "zur Inspiration" sehen willst, guck z.B. hier. Grüße, abf «Cabale!» 19:15, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wie meinen, "symmetrischer"--Milad A380 (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Flugzeug mittig, nichts abschneiden, gängiges Format (z.B. 3:2, 4:3). Grüße, abf «Cabale!» 19:56, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...ist kein A319. :D Kommst du selbst drauf, oder soll ich helfen? ;) abf «Cabale!» 22:17, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ÄÄh...doch.Das Seitenleitwerk einer A319.--Milad A380 (talk) 08:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moment mal...Seh grad an der reg das es doch nicht das Seitenleitwerk der 319 ist,die ich eine Minute davor "geknipst" hab--Milad A380 (talk) 08:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Man sieht mit bloßem Auge, dass das "etwas" größer als das Leitwerk eines A319 ist... es ist ja auch "nur" von einer B744... :D ;) abf «Cabale!» 09:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
oookey...--Milad A380 (talk) 11:17, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe es jetzt (siehe Titel) auf einen passenden Namen verschoben. Grüße, abf «Cabale!» 11:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject[edit]

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Commons' coverage of aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! russavia (talk) 19:41, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have renamed the file but in the future please provide your reason before your proposal is rejected. Also please make sure your proposed name is meaningful. "D-AISG.jpg" doesn't mean anything to me. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 19:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Many aircraft-picures haven names like that. It's the Aircraft registration. And the old registration was wrong.--Milad A380 (talk) 20:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I made an mistake. Its AISD and not AISG. Can you...--Milad A380 (talk) 20:03, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can rename it, that is simple. Just put up the proper proposal. However I'd like to ask, what is ASID? It is meaningless to me. You need to also identify the subject of the photo. For instance what is the model of the aircraft? What is the airliner? Just looking at the filename I should be able to understand what it is about. I cannot even tell if it is an aircraft looking at it though. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
I see your userpage links to many of these. Could you be kind enough to post the changes based on my comment above? :) -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
With ASID I mean the aircraft-registration, D-ASID. And a renaming of these files is not congruous wirh the renaming guidelines (I don't request, the name is not meaningless, it's not misleaded, there's no error and it's really not pejorative, offensive or crude. :) ) --Milad A380 (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The name is meaningless to me. Its random letters and is inline with commons guidelines for a rename.A filename should at the very least explain what image covers. That could of course include the aircraft registration but also other information such as the airliner, model of the plane and perhaps the airport it is at. The filename for example be should be something like File:Lufthansa Airbus A321-200 (D-ASID) at Düsseldorf International Airport.jpg instead of File:D-ASID.jpg. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 23:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:SAS MD-82 SE-DIN.JPG[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:SAS MD-82 SE-DIN.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 17:06, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OOps, Iforgot the licence. But now it's ok. -- Milad A380 (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Turkish A321 TC-JMI.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:British Airways A319 G-EUPC Firefly.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 20:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, something happened wrong when I uploaded the picture. Now I added the license. -- Milad A380 (talk) 10:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SAS 73G SE-RER.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments imho Good quality. --Steinsplitter 16:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:N277AY.JPG[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:N277AY.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 12:15, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

license added. -- Milad A380 (talk) 17:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[edit]

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. Good luck and thanks. Steinsplitter (talk) 19:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)--Steinsplitter (talk) 19:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I guess you overwrote unintentionally the first picture and may want to upload it again under another name. Best regards --Jwh (talk) 08:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 15:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sol del Py 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 08:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

not my problem, i just removed the watermark etc, you should consider contacting the original author -- ~~

WikiProject Aviation now on Twitter[edit]

Hi, as mentioned here, Commons:WikiProject Aviation is now on Twitter. I will be using the feed to tweet photos from our now extensive repository of aviation imagery, and will also use it for outreach activities. If you have any suggestions on how to get the maximum use out of Twitter feel free to leave suggestions on the Aviation project talk page. You can follow the account at http://www.twitter.com/commonsaviation. Cheers, russavia (talk) 14:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Timothe8872[edit]

He ignored your warning, and therefore has been reported on COM:AN/B. Hopefully an administrator seeing the report will take the appropriate action. DLindsley (My talk page) 21:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I already reported him at COM:ANV ;) -- Milad A380 talk? 21:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I apparently see that he has been blocked by Green Giant. :) DLindsley (My talk page) 21:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion for PAPL8S files[edit]

Since you were subjected to PAPL8S' joy today: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PAPL8S. --Closeapple (talk) 02:49, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. License plates[edit]

Hiya: I closed your DN as Procedural Keep because there were far too many plates & too many states in a single nomination for anyone to make any sense out of it at all. No it's not 'easy' for an admin to run around with a mop after people and clean up. If you wish to reopen these nominations, please do at least state by state. Do not repeat this monster deletion nomination or most likely the same thing will happen. No one will comment and the images will be kept. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nimm dir 'nen Keks![edit]

Danke für das einbinden und verbessern... Rogi (talk) 07:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! -- Milad A380 talk? 15:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Milad A380, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:32, 8 July 2015 (UTC) Thanks! Danke! Gracias! -- Milad A380 talk? 09:35, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hop on Bananas (talk) 23:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flugzeug erkennen[edit]

Hallo MX8, da das letztens per Mail so wunderbar funktioniert hat - vielen Dank nochmal dafür - noch mal ein paar bilder zum kategoriesieren.

  • - die Maschine flog von Mauritius nach Madagaskar

gruß --Z thomas 14:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-recording device/de has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:38, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]