User talk:Odejea
coat of arms[edit]
Hi, I was just wondering how you "make" the images of coat of arms? do you use any software or do you do it all manually?
I once used a software called Blazon95, I have some images on my webpage. --DelftUser talk 08:30, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I'm very sorry for doing this incorrectly, but I'm attempting to write a dissertation on Bohemond of Taranto/Antioch, and have noticed that you have designed a crest representing him whilst at Antioch. I was just wondering if you knew what crest he went under before he took Antioch, I wasn't sure if it was his father, Robert Guiscard's Hauteville family crest or possibly a crest for Taranto (which I cannot find anywhere). I'd like to include it on the cover for my dissertation, but want to make sure I have the correct shield first! Any help would be great as I'm at a bit of a loss currently. My wikipedia username is Jaymsd23, and again sorry for just butting in on another topic, I couldn't see how to create a new one, I hope it isn't a problem. Regards, James.
Le blason d'Auxonne[edit]
(image : Armoiries_Comté_Auxonne.png) Bonjour, Il me semble que le blason de la ville d'Auxonne est légèrement différent de celui que vous présentez.
au deuxième parti, d'azur à une demi-croix d'argent ancrée
Vous pourrez en voir un exemple à l'url : /perso.wanadoo.fr/g.chp/ Découverte de la ville d'Auxonne
Sont présentés sur ce site le logo moderne d'Auxonne ainsi que le blason. Cordialement.
Odejea, I love many of your blazons. I've uploaded a couple of them from French Wikipedia to Commons, and used more of them in Spanish Wikipedia. I don't understand much French, but the description of Image:Armoiries Chypre.png (d'argent, au lion de gueules, armé et lampassé de gueules) seems to include no golden crown. Is Image:Armoiries Chypre.png correct or is it another version of Image:Blason Léon.png (with a different crown)? Merci. --user:Erri4a User talk:Erri4a es:discusión usuario:erri4a 01:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Cher Odejea, Comment se fait-il que sur le blason de la ville de Metz que tu as dessiné, le bleu ciel qui apparait sur le fichier de l'image ne se retrouve pas sur celle reproduite dans l'article Metz ? Y a-t-il un bug quelque part ? Cordialement,--Marspol 07:01, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- J'ai eu du mal à saisir le phénomène que vous décriviez. En fait, la partie hors blason de l'image est en couleur de transparence et est visualisé différemment selon les navigateurs.
- Sous Mozilla Firefox, c'est une série de carrés gris et blancs
- Sous IE6, j'ai un fond gris à la page image, et un fond blanc à la page article.
- C'est donc probablement lié aussi au navigateur. Cordialement. Odejea 11:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Bonjour Odejea, thank you for creating the coats of arms of the Holy Roman Emperors, it's really good work. However could you do me a favour? The current category is called Category:Coats of arms of holy emperor. I don't want to mess around with your work, could you please rename the category into "Coats of arms of Holy Roman Emperors", in order to make it consistent with the other categories concerning the Holy Roman Emperors, for example "Coronations of Holy Roman Emperors"? Could you also please list the corrected category with a |* in order to have it appear first. Your help is greatly appreciated, merci beaucoup, if you have further questions or need help feel free to ask me. Gryffindor 01:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- It's done. Odejea 21:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- C'est parfait, merci beaucoup. Gryffindor 21:22, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
contradiction[edit]
Bonjour!
Je trouve sur la page Maison de Bauffremont la description du blason, avec notamment pour I 2 et IV 2: " de gueules à l'aigle d'or (Vienne) chargé sur son estomac d'un écusson de sable à trois tête de léopard d'argent (Listenois)".
A côté se trouve l'image d'un blason sur lequel l'aigle est sur fond bleu(donc d'azur et non de gueules). Je crois que tu as participé à la réalisation de l'image.
Peux-tu s'il te plait vérifier s'il y a contradiction, et le cas échéant envisager la conduite à suivre? (je ne saurais pas retoucher un dessin, et si c'est un mot à changer, il sera plus simple de le changer toi-même que de me dire de le faire...)
Merci! 81.56.146.137 06:54, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- C'est fait. Merci de m'avoir signalé l'erreur. Odejea 07:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Palé de Barcelonnette[edit]
Bonjour,
Ton blason de Barcelonnette présente un "palé de gueules et d'or" (on cite en premier la couleur la plus à gauche - à dextre pour les puristes) là où tu annonces un "palé d'or et de gueules". Cela n'enlève rien à la beauté de ton dessin, mais si tu as un moment pour corriger à l'occasion... Bien cordialement, Bruno 17:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
armes utilisées par la ville d'Arlon[edit]
Je viens juste de trouver que sur fr.wikipedia dans l'article d'Arlon l'image armoiries_comté_luxembourg.png était utilisé alors que la description de la page donnait un blazonnement différent. J'ai donc rapidement modifié un de tes fichiers (armoiries_luxembourg_ancien.png) et lié à cet article. J'espère que tu n'y vois aucun inconvénient (je n'ai plus mes vieux fichiers pour construire mes propres dessins et ne suis qu'en train de me créer une nouvelle base de donnée). J'ai nommé l'image en question armoiries_arlon.png.--Caranorn 21:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Hallo. You have emblazoned the coat of arms of Richard II. I have noted, however, that instead of martlets (fr: merlette), five ducks have been used in the right half of the shield. Martlets have stubs or short feathers instead of legs and should resemble swifts (fr. martinet). See here or here. --AtonX 14:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hello. I was wondering if it was at all possible if you could correct the above image? The martlets clearly look like ducks and shouldn't be. Thanks, Craigy 02:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure Odejea reads this talk page. You might want to try and contact him on french language wikipedia. Though to note, many french heraldists use that duck like shape for the martlet.--Caranorn 11:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice but I think that's a bit of a broad statement. IMO, it stems from the fact that the owner of heraldique-europeene lacks the correct clipart to display any other birds except ducks(!) Craigy 16:24, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Take a look at this link. Leudelange, this is the official site of a Luxembourgish municipality, using a copy of the official image and based on the blazoning: d'or à l'ours de sable au chef de gueules chargé de trois merlettes d'argent. The french merlette is of course the englsih martlet. I could probably find a dozen other examples (Armorials, or Heraldic Artists, not just individual arms). Personally I'm using a drawing based on a swift (then again, I almost exclusively deal with medieval arms) and dislike the duck like looks, but Arnaud Bunel (of Héraldique Européenne) is not the only one to use these.--Caranorn 13:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ouch, I just took another look at the Plantagenet arms, this one is uglier then usual, and the beaks and legs are very prominent. So it definitely should be updated, but someone has to tell Odejea.--Caranorn 13:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Philip I of Taranto[edit]
(copying my comment at en Wikipedia) You've created Image:Armoiries Anjou Constantinople.png for his coat of arms during his first marriage, but I've read an article in JSTOR (Gerola, G. The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs (1928) 53 288, 293–295) which describes an enamelled casket once owned by the couple. The arms of Thamar are described as "a double-headed eagle or upon a field gules", rather than the Imperial device in the figure you've made. Also, looking at the illustration of the casket, the label in Philip's coat of arms is placed over the bend, not vice-versa. You may wish to correct it to conform to this historical example. Best wishes, and thanks for all your fine work making coats of arms. Choess 07:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
A question[edit]
Goodmorning,
I'm looking for the program or software you and other users use to make this coat-of-arms. I like Heraldry and I want to create blasons for wikipedia. How can I do it? Thank you very much. My e-mail for your answer: jbagesquerolb@yahoo.es
16th January 2007
dauphin[edit]
J'aimerais savoir si l'animal représenter sur cette armoirie s'appelle dauphin. fr:user:Vincnet
censure[edit]
You've censured the original description "D'or, à quatre pals de gueules (Barcelone)" clearing "Barcelone" in http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aragon.png "d'or à quatre pals de gueules." and here http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagen:Aragon.png
The really description is "D'or, à quatre pals de gueules (Barcelone). http://www.heraldique-europeenne.org/Armoriaux/Gelre/F62r.htm#1 This in the armorial de gelre but in the same page the description for Aragon is: http://www.heraldique-europeenne.org/Accueil.htm Royaume d'Aragon Aragon moderne - en réalité les armes des Comtes de Barcelone
i beg you to retract your censure in the description and write "D'or, à quatre pals de gueules (Barcelone)", and please, CHANGE THE NAME OF THE IMAGE, AT LEAST, ARAGON/BARCELONE. Thanks for not change the history! --Clonick 18:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Template et catégorie[edit]
Bonjour, on a constaté un problème de catégorisation relaté à des templates qui catégorisent automatiquement. Il m'a pris quelque temps (et des changements que vous pouvez au besoin défaire dans quelques edits de blasons) avant de découvrir que votre template Odejea/blason contient le template Insignia qui met tous vos blasons dans la surcatégorie Category:Insignia, surchargeant cette catégorie-racine. Voulez-vous étudier la possibilité d'enlever Insignia de votre template blason ou de le remplacer de façon que la catégorie Insignia n'est plus produit automatiquement? Amicalement, Havang 18:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Je pense que l'avertissement {{Insignia}} a sa place sur tous les blasons, donc il ne me paraît pas pertinent de l'enlever de mon modèle, car il faudrait l'ajouter pour chaque blason, ce qui reviendrait au mêm problème. Peut-être faut-il enlever la catégorisation de ce modèle ?
- Odejea 20:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Quelques experts travaillent déjà sur le problème, voir entre autres Template talk:Blason-fr-en-it. Je les laisse faire; tu pourras les contacter peut-être. Amicalement. Havang 10:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Blason Pointe a Pitre.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 07:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be delated and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's deleted now, --FilnikRock! 14:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Concerning Coat of Arms of Medici.svg[edit]
Hi!
I've created an SVG version of your original PNG image and i want to know what you think of it. --Oren neu dag 17:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Blasons en SVG[edit]
Bonjour Odejea !
Pourquoi ne pas réaliser directement les blasons en SVG, en suivant les recommandations de fr:Projet:Blasons/Création ? Cela rendrait le projet plus productif et éviterait d'avoir à re-créer les mêmes blasons en SVG par la suite.
Cordialement. Peter17 12:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Bonsoir Olivier,
- Tu sembles avoir abandonné Inkscape par manque d'informations qui auraient pu t'aider. Tu fais bien comme tu veux, mais c'est peut-être dommage. À tout hasard tu pourras jeter un œil à ma page-mémoire Trucs et astuces avec Inkscape où j'ai rassemblé quelques idées. Je n'ai jamais osé me lancer dans la rédaction d'une page didactique officielle, cela reste donc très informel et sans prétention. N'hésite pas si tu décides de t'y remettre et que tu as des questions : je suis loin de tout connaître mais je crois avoir compris le minimum vital.
- Bien cordialement, Bruno 20:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Bonjour Odejea !
- Si tu le veux bien, je suis d'accord pour répondre à toutes tes questions sur l'utilisation d'Inkscape, dans la limite de mes connaissances. Je ne l'avais moi-même jamais utilisé avant de réaliser mon premier blason. La première difficulté est la modification des calques verrouillés. Pour afficher la liste des calques, faire « Calque/Calques » ([Ctrl]+[Maj]+[L] chez moi). On pourra mettre à jour le guide fr:Projet:Blasons/Création au fur et à mesure.
- Cordialement. Peter17 13:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Philibert_II_of_Savoy.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Philibert_II_of_Savoy.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lupo 15:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Bonjour ! J'ignorais que le département n'avait pas pris ce blason officiellement. Du coup, je me suis fondée simplement sur le nombre d'occurrences (une image était plus utilisée que l'autre). Plus généralement, le problème avec les blasons est que souvent, le nom du fichier comporte le nom d'une famille/ville/etc. revendiquant ces armes. Évidemment, deux familles/etc. ou plus peuvent avoir les mêmes armes, ce qui engendre des doublons. L'idéal serait à mon avis que le nom des blasons reflète seulement le blasonnement, ce qui serait beaucoup plus "neutre".
Pour en revenir au problème qui nous occupe là, est-ce que le nom pose problème ? Est-ce que tu souhaites qu'on inverse (on garde Image:Blason_comte_fr_Bigorre.svg au lieu de Image:Blason_dpt_fr_HautesPyrenees.svg) ?
- Dans un cas comme Image:Armoiries Sardaigne 1831.svg je ne crois pas qu'il y ait beaucoup de doublons :-) Je pense évidemment aux blasons relativement simples. Après, il est sans doute difficile de trouver un nom à la fois concis et non-ambigu.
- L'auteur de Image:Blason comte fr Bigorre.svg est le même que Image:Blason_dpt_fr_HautesPyrenees.svg, donc il n'y a pas de problème (à ma connaissance) pour les droits d'auteur.
- De manière générale, est-ce que les collectivités locales françaises ont des blasons officiels ? Est-ce qu'il y a un endroit sur fr: où je peux interroger les ceusses qui savent sur le nom à retenir ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- Je suis sur que Odejea va encore te répondre, mais l'endroit que tu demandes sur fr. est le Projet Blasons. Je ne m'y connais pas trop en blasons officiels français, ne peut donc pas te répondre à ce point.
- En ce qui concerne les noms de fichiers, je suis d'accord qu'utiliser le blasonnement serait parfois une bonne idée, mais je crois aussi que c'est beaucoup trop tard pour ce genre de changement et qu'il y aurait de bons argument contre une telle idée. En fait je crois que la solution serait de demander un changement de politique ici sur commons et d'autoriser les doublons et doublons à l'identique (je m'en suis fait effacer quatre ce weekend (et c'était tout à fait correcte d'après la politique actuelle, bien que dans l'un des cas j'aurais préféré supprimer l'image originale plutôt que le doublon)). Alternativement un système ou on pourrait indiquer les informations de l'image (nom du personnage armorié, blazon, historique, source etc.) et puis rediriger vers un autre fichier pour l'image seulement, mais là çà va dans le technique.--Caranorn 11:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Le gonfanon du pape (ou basilica) devrait etre avec girons d'or et de gueules (ombrelle à galons de gueules et d'or) comme dans l'image Ombrellino-keys.svg . Dans le dictionnaire araldique officiel italien il est decrit ainsi: Basilica è un termine utilizzato in araldica per indicare il gonfalone papale, a guisa di ombrellone a gheroni rossi e gialli; coi pendenti tagliati a vaio e di colori contrastati; l'asta a forma di lancia coll'arresto ed è attraversata dalle chiavi pontificie, una d'oro e l'altra d'argento; decussate, addossate, gli ingegni in alto, legate di rosso.. A propos: merci pour ton ouvre de nettoyage des images non svg. A bientot -Massimop (talk) 20:05, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Coat of arms of Cerdanya (Cerdagne)[edit]
I've seen you have changed the coat of arms of the region, but I find it a bit strange (like Barcelona's coat of arms). I've checked the linked web, but also is too different to what is traditional seen. I mean, there are some other webs (no description of the coat of arms) where they show the arms in a sautor quartelation (sorry for this interlanguage mix :P). That is why I think the web you linked maybe do not blazon well this coat of arms. The spanish/catalan side of the Cerdagne use well the sautor quartelation. Some examples: here, or here, this showing the official design of the council body over the territory. Anyway, I couldn't find yet a fine description of it :( --HansenBCN (talk) 16:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Reference found! [1] Just for the County of Cerdanya. In the spanish wikipedia we use sometimes this web as a reference for meubles in heraldry and nobility heraldry of the Crwon of Aragon. --HansenBCN (talk) 16:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
comtes de La Marck[edit]
Salut Odejea,
Je viens de voir que tu as téléchargé l'image Image:Armoiries Comtes de la Marck.svg récemment. Il me semble que tu as inversé les émaux de la fasce échiquetée. D'ailleurs j'avais déjà une image de ces armoiries en ligne sous Image:Armoiries de la Marck 1.svg et une variante sous Image:Armoiries de la Marck 2.svg. A noter, les erreurs d'inversion d'émaux sont courants chez nos collègues Allemands, mais nous disposons de meilleurs sources donc il faudrait essayer de ne pas contribuer à ces erreurs (je l'ai aussi fait au début, ou du moins j'ai douté de mes images échiquetées d'origine allemandes).--Caranorn (talk) 14:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Pas de problème.--Caranorn (talk) 15:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Modèles d'information et de licence[edit]
Salut. J'ai remarqué que tu utilises un modèle de licence personnalisé : User:Odejea/Licences. L'utilisation de ces modèles directement dans les pages de description des images est fortement déconseillée (voir Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories policy#Regarding licenses), sauf si tu substitues le modèle. J'ai donc utilisé un robot pour le substituer ; auparavant, j'ai standardisé le modèle (diff) afin de le rendre davantage homogène avec les autres pages de descriptions d'image. J'espère que ça te convient.
Dans la même optique, il est nécessaire de séparer, dans ton modèle User:Odejea/Photo, la partie « description » (que tu es libre de personnaliser) et la partie « licence » (qui doit être standardisée pour les raisons évoquées ci-dessus). Il est également fortement conseillé, afin de faciliter les recherches d'images, de baser ton modèle de description sur le modèle {{Information}} (voir Commons:First steps/Quality and description#Good file descriptions et Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories policy#Templates). J'ai par conséquent fait ce changement (que tu es libre d'annuler). Une fois que le robot aura ajouté les licences sur toutes les pages utilisant User:Odejea/Photo, j'enlèverai la partie « licence » de cette page ; ainsi, la partie « description » et la partie « licence » seront séparées. Si tu es d'accord, je peux par la même occasion substituer ton modèle User:Odejea/Photo afin que les images utilisent directement le modèle {{Information}}. Y vois-tu un inconvénient ?
N'hésite pas si tu as des questions ou des remarques. guillom 10:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- PS : je viens de m'apercevoir sur ta page utilisateur que tu utilisais Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Odejea/Licences pour lier l'ensemble de tes travaux. Comme cela ne va plus fonctionner une fois que le modèle de licence aura été substitué, j'ai créé Category:Files by Odejea, que je vais ajouter aux images en substituant le modèle (exemple). Une fois ça terminé, je repasserai le robot sur les permières images, où le modèle a été substitué sans la catégorie. guillom 10:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- PPS : je viens de me rendre compte que ton modèle User:Odejea/BlasonEmpereur fonctionne de la même façon que User:Odejea/Photo ; il va donc falloir séparer la licence dans ce cas également. M'autorises-tu à en profiter pour utiliser le modèle {{Information}} ? guillom 15:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Bon, j'ai vaincu mon hésitation et j'ai adapté ton modèle User:Odejea/BlasonEmpereur pour qu'il utilise le modèle standard (diff). J'ai conservé tous tes paramètres. Un exemple de ce que ça donne : Image:Armoiries empereur Frédéric III.png. Qu'en penses-tu ? guillom 15:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- PPS : je viens de me rendre compte que ton modèle User:Odejea/BlasonEmpereur fonctionne de la même façon que User:Odejea/Photo ; il va donc falloir séparer la licence dans ce cas également. M'autorises-tu à en profiter pour utiliser le modèle {{Information}} ? guillom 15:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Please tag your images[edit]
Thank you for providing images to the Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikipedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best use CommonsHelper
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Armoiries Frédéric V de Wittelsbach, roi de Bohême.svg[edit]
Hello, I have a questions about this CoA. Why Czech King from Holy Roman Empire, living in era of Baroque use modern french shield? And, don't you know why have Friedrich claimats for CoA of Luxembourg (for example here he don't use CoA of Luxemburg). --marv1N (talk) 21:14, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Personal Arms[edit]
I really love your work and would be interested in knowing if I could commission you to illustrate my family's coat of arms. Do you have a web page with your fees and services listed?
Image:Blason Ducs de Styrie.svg[edit]
Bonjour Odejea, J'ai une petite question : qu'est-ce-que ta panthère a-t-elle de plus que la mienne ?
Avant de la monter, j'avais pourtant bien lu l'article fr:Liste_des_meubles_héraldiques#Panth.C3.A8re et réalisé un monstre composé d’une tête de taureau (Là il est vrai que je me suis égaré en boucherie et j'ai dû me servir en boucherie chevaline, peut être par peur de l'fr:Encéphalopathie spongiforme bovine ! Toujours est-il que je lui ai ajouté des cornes de bovidé), un corps de lion, les pattes avant d’aigle, les pattes arrières de lion, et la queue d’un léopard. Hormis sa tête, techniquement, elle n'est pas plus fautive que la tienne. Là où je veux en venir : c'est qu'un bandeau Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Blason Ducs de Styrie.svg lui a été apposé sans qu'on prévienne l'auteur de l'image puis cette dernière a été écrasée de la même manière.
N'y a-t-il pas un petit peu d'abus ??
A bon entendeur...
Cordialement, Jimmy44 (talk) 13:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC).
- Salut Jimmy, je suis pas sur que Odejea réponde rapidement ici. De toute façon, la tête de cheval n'était pas fausse non plus. A l'époque du vote je ne savais pas encore que cette variante existait. En somme, les deux images (la tienne et celle d'Odejea) sont toutes deux correctes.--Caranorn (talk) 16:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Rebonjour, je fais une copie de ce message à User:Gryffindor ainsi qu'à fr:Utilisateur:Odejea. Cordialement, Jimmy44 (talk) 19:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC).
Thank you for providing images to the Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikipedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best use CommonsHelper
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- Please, read the comment with this image : Bad name, must be deleted. Odejea ( ) 18:14, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Suppression d'images[edit]
Image deletion warning | Image:Armoiries Beaujeu.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Image deletion warning | Image:Armoiries_Beaujeu.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Armoiries Naxos[edit]
Bonjour,
Merci pour les armoiries du duché de Naxos (Image:Armoiries Naxos.svg). Cependant, il s'agit des armoiries de la famille Sanudi et à partir du XIVe siècle, le duché est gouverné par les Crispi qui ont ce blason-ci Image:Crispi Coat of Arms.jpg. Crois-tu qu'il soit nécessaire de faire la précision ? Cedric B. (talk) 15:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Besoin d'aide[edit]
Bonjour.
Je vois que vous avez créé plusieurs blasons ici.
J'ai téléchargé Inkscape et Blender mais je n'y comprends rien :(
Cela vous embêterait il de tenter de m'expliquer comment faire des blasons avec ces logiciels ou bien de m'en faire 2 ou 3 que je souhaite insérer ici?
Merci beaucoup d'avance ! :)
Bien cordialement.
--Herzog123 (talk) 14:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Armoiries Beaujeu.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 22:55, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Stemma di Papa Alessandro VIII Ottoboni[edit]
Prego correggere lo stemma di Papa Alessandro VIII che è "troncato" e non col "Capo" dell'Impero. Grazie Domenico Serlupi Crescenzi Ottoboni
The emblem of the Pope is incorrect: the coat of arms is truncated that is divided horizontally in half. You can see www.serlupi.it. Domenico Serlupi Crescenzi Ottoboni
I thank you: now it is good!
Domenico Serlupi Crescenzi Ottoboni, 29.9.08
tout simplement merci --Mrhugues (talk) 19:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Armoiries of Habsbourg[edit]
Hi Odejea, I really like your coat of arms of Habsbourgs (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Armoiries_Habsbourg.svg) and I would like to print it on a shirt for myself. Is there any chance of getting it from you in editable vector format (ai, eps, pdf)? As I need to rescale it a bit, and it is not possible with this svg file. Thanks. (Rastio21_aol(at)gmx.net)
Bonjour![edit]
I have seen your excellent work, and wish to talk with you about a project. Please contact me on AIM or Yahoo messenger at llloololoolll, or on MSN messenger at llloololoolll@hotmail.com
Thank you, and I look forward to talking soon!
Valais ?[edit]
Le
<desc id="desc4">Flag of Canton of Valais (Wallis)</desc>
présent dans chacun des fichiers SVG me semble un tantinet louche. Je serais fortement étonné que le Valais ait autant de drapeaux...
- Je ne vois pas à quoi vous faites allusion. Pouvez-vous m'éclairer ? Odejea (♫♪) 09:45, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Traslation into italian language[edit]
Hello.
I made a traslation of theese your beautiful maps:
County of Edessa 1131-1150.svg
County_of_Edessa_1098-1131.svg
Bye. Franco aq (talk)
[edit]
Bonjour. Dans la description vous indiquez : Cette image représente les armoiries des rois de Navarre de la maison capétienne d'Evreux. Je pense qu'il s'agit de la maison des Thibaldiens de Champagne.
Cordialement. Site Heratlas
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 21:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Armoiries empereur Sigismond Ier.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Armoiries Arnaud de Blanquefort.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Armoiries Limbourg.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Hundred years war france england 1435.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Blason Lusignan Issoudun.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Armoiries Jean de Luxembourg-Ligny.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Armoiries Luxembourg-Saint-Pol.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Armoiries Comtes Lorraine-Vaudémont.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Armoiries Comtes Vaudémont.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Hundred years war france england 1435-fr.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Blason en Anne Mortimer.svg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Bason en family de Burgh.svg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
This should not be a subcategory of Category:Coat of arms of women, because there are many coats of arms on lozenge-shaped shields which are NOT those of women (such as those of Catalan cities)... AnonMoos (talk) 11:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC) Can anyone help me with the e-mail-adress to the person, who makes the veapons called Odejea? My adress is: JesperAsmussen74@GMail.Com
Bonsoir, Odejea Je suis l´auteur original du Blason "File:Bissau.PNG".....c´est excellent avez une image svg, mais, votre desin ayez un grand erreur.....la coronne-murale, a la part superieur du desin c´est incorrecte. Cela besoin de 5 tours, et non seulement 4, comme en votre desin. Capitales, au Portugal, Bresil et autres pays lusophones utilisant 5 tours. Voir comme example le blason de Goiânia, Lisboa, Dili, ou São Tomé. SVP, changez ton desin. Emerson
File:Armoiries Saxe.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--BrightRaven (talk) 15:40, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Rohan-Guéméné.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--BrightRaven (talk) 11:04, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Question sur cartes[edit]
Bonjour,
Je travaille sur un projet d'Histoire sur iPad (http://www.karizmatic.fr/une-touche-dhistoire-appel-a-participation/) qui a un gros besoin de cartes Pour l'instant, les auteurs récupèrent les cartes de différentes sources mais ca pose des problèmes au niveau du "look" qui n'est pas unifié du tout.
J'ai vu ton travail sur Wikipedia et je le trouve bon. Du coup, je me demandais si tu étais intéressé pour participer au projet. Sinon, peut être peux-tu m'indiquer des pistes pour trouver des fonds de cartes (ou faire passer le mot sur bon besoin).
File:Armoirie André Hongrie.png[edit]
Hi!
This (File:Armoirie André Hongrie.png) coat of arms not from the Árpád family. Thely was from the Angevin/Anjou family. We had great kings from this family.
Bye,
Madboy74 (talk) 21:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I couldn't translate correctly. (Derivatives)
Bonjour Odejea, concernant les armes des Rohan-Soubise, il y a contradiction entre ta source (RIETSTAP) et le blason que tu a dessiné :
- au 1, d'azur, à trois fleurs-de-lis d'or à la bande componnée d'argent et de gueules brochant (Evreux);
- au 3, d'or, à quatre pals de gueules (Aragon);
Le blasonnement est confirmé dans Histoire des seigneurs et de la seigneurie de Roubaix Par Théodore Leuridan Cdlt,--Jimmy44 (talk) 08:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Does this statue depict Count Alphonse II. really?[edit]
Hello, are you sure that your photo really depicts the body of Provencal count Alphonse? Because forms of this statue reminds me a body of woman (look at the breast and subtle facial features!) rather than man's one. Didn't you could make a mistake during the photographing? (Maybe confusion of captions.) --Iaroslavvs (talk) 15:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Armoiries de Jérusalem.svg[edit]
Bonjour, Dans l'état actuel de l'image File:Armoiries de Jérusalem.svg, il semble que tu t'attribues la paternité d'une image importée en tant que travail personnel par l'utilisateur:Ayack. Au vu de l'historique, il semble s'agir d'un oubli qui proviendrait probablement du fait que tu as d'abord importé une nouvelle version, en retirant les informations concernant l'attribution et les licences d'Ayack pour les remplacer par les tiennes [2], mais que plus tard tu es revenu à l'image d'origine d'Ayack [3], mais tu aurais alors oublié de retirer tes informations et de remettre les informations d'origine d'Ayack avec son attribution et ses licences. Est-ce bien ce qui s'est passé? S'il y a erreur, pourrais-tu retirer ton attribution et tes licences et replacer les attributions et licences relatives à l'image de Ayack? Sinon, pourrais-tu clarifier davantage cette situation? Merci. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour. J'ai relevé un petit problème au sujet de ce blason : tu as dessiné une porte ouverte de couleur grise et des fenêtres ouvertes de sable alors que la description de Gaso ne dit rien à ce sujet. Le dessin du cercle généalogique ne le montre pas non plus d'ailleurs. Cordialement, ℍenry (Babel talk !) (Francophone ?) 09:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour Odejea, saist-tu pour le modèle {{template:disputed coat of arms|why|…}} est toujours sur ce fichier ? Pourtant tu as corrigé le blason ?--Jimmy44 (talk) 10:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
COA pt garde nationale républicaine[edit]
Hi, I want to notify you the problem I wrote about in File talk:COA pt garde nationale républicaine.svg.--DoppioM 19:27, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Already fixed, thanks anyway.--DoppioM 12:13, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Ecosse.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bellae artes (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
How can I make coat of arms on the pc?[edit]
Hi Odejea, I've seen you've made a lot of coat of arms. I'm really interested to make the same: I'd like to make some coat of amrs for wikipedia but morely for a personal research. Could you tell me how have you made the coats of amrs, please? Which program or programs have you used to and where can I to download it ore them? Please answer me. I wait your answer. --Francescocap96 (talk) 22:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your work[edit]
Hello | |
I really like the shields of the interests of the Masters of the Knights Templar. I would like to know the source of your information because he did not know its existence. Greetings and thank you very much. Juan Pablo Benito (talk) 23:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you![edit]
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | |
Bonjour, je m' appelle Jean-Michel Pinoteau, j'écris un livre de 160 pages illustrées (300 images), sur l'ancestrale culture du chanvre.en France et dans le monde…
Serait-il possible, pour parachever cet ouvrage, d'utiliser votre dessin du blason de Broyes. M'accorderiez-vous l'autorisation exclusive de le publier dans mon livre ? En auriez-vous éventuellement une version Hd (320dpi)… Que dois-je inscrire sous ce blason pour vous créditer de ce travail?... Merci pour votre aide... Jah-ova (talk) 18:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you![edit]
The Technical Barnstar | |
Bonjour, :Odejea
i' m writing a book (160 pages, 300 pictures) in France about agriculture… Is it possible to illustrate it with the picture of : "blason de Broyes" armoiries des seigneurs de Broyes (Marne). for Projet Blasons du Wikipédia francophone Is this picture in the public domain ? Or can i have your autorisation to use it, only for my book… Have you maybe an high rèsolution version (300dpi)? (i will thanks your under this photo) Thank you for your help… ----- (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2013 (UTC) |
Copyright status: File:Armoiries Valois Angoulême.png[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Armoiries Valois Angoulême.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 14:05, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Blason comte fr Angouleme (Valois).svg[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Blason comte fr Angouleme (Valois).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 12:21, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Armoiries famille d'Abbeville.png[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Armoiries famille d'Abbeville.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
–moogsi (blah) 03:22, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Armoiries Vermandois.svg[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Armoiries Vermandois.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Thanks, –moogsi (blah) 03:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Armoiries Vivarais.png[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Armoiries Vivarais.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
–moogsi (blah) 04:55, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Armoiries Valentinois.png[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Armoiries Valentinois.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
De728631 (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
The same goes for:
De728631 (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Blason Vexin Français.png[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Blason Vexin Français.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
De728631 (talk) 21:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Armoiries Poitiers-Valentinois.png[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Armoiries Poitiers-Valentinois.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 18:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Armoiries Papales[edit]
Bonjour, j'interviens modestement sur la phaléristique sur Wikipedia et Wikimedia commons. Un de mes amis, auteur d'ouvrage publié sur la phaléristique travaille sur un manuscrit sur les ordres, décorations et médailles du Vatican. Il souhaiterai pouvoir communiquer avec vous en ce qui concerne vos superbes illustrations des armoiries papales, afin de pouvoir les utiliser éventuellement dans son ouvrage. Comment peut-on faire pour la mise en contact ? D'avance merci de votre réponse NBK Nicolas Botta-Kouznetzoff phaleristique@orange.fr
Blasones pontificios[edit]
Te informo que el usuario Echando una mano cambio (alteró) el diseño sobre los escudos de los papas Calisto III y Alejandro VI. Por favor revísalos.
También ha alterado el blasón de la Casa de Borja o Borgia.
--Jdurbo (talk) 20:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Saxe.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Antemister (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Héraldique origine saxonne de la maison de Savoie.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Antemister (talk) 22:45, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Saxe.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 09:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Blason Charles XIV de Suède.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
dates in template[edit]
Hey. Can you add the period when a COA was used in your template? I guess the dates are as formal as the components. With files like File:Blason duche fr Anjou (moderne).svg and File:Armoiries Ducs Anjou.png, one can find out the history that made the arms evolve, but it will take no little effort. If you or whoever is contributing to the project with your template, noted the years when a COA was put in or out of use, that would be very helpful. Thank you. Danny lost (talk) 19:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Need to Hire Heraldry Artist[edit]
Odeja,
I am looking to hire someone to translate French blazons from Rietstap's into English. Let me know if you are interested: coadb@mail.com.
-John L.
Statue Alphonse II[edit]
Hi Odejea, this is women - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Statue_Alphonse_II.JPG?uselang=fr .--Meluzína (talk) 15:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Dear Odejea. Add please the sea names on your map. Regards, --Kirill Borisenko (talk) 19:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Owen Tudor.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-- User: Perhelion 03:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Hongrie ancien.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
63.143.114.139 17:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Joinville ancien.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.47 13:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Richard de Cornouailles.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.47 13:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Aragon Ancien.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.47 15:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Autriche-Este.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.47 15:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Gilbert Montpensier.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.47 15:39, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Montlezun-Pardiac.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.47 15:42, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Beaufort-Exeter.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.47 16:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Charles Anjou av 1246.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.47 16:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Armoiries François de Conti.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.47 17:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Este 1535.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.47 17:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Blason gw Bissau.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
SanSilva (talk) 01:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:COA family fr Maistre (Savoy).svg[edit]
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:COA family fr Maistre (Savoy).svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 06:55, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! COA polish king Jagellon.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! COA polish king Etienne Bathory.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Metalindustrien (talk) 10:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Blason actuel de Bernay.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 12:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Blason Bourbon-Lancy.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 13:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Blason Château-Salins.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 14:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Blason Chatellerault 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 14:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Blason Chatellerault 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Blason Artois.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 20:08, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Blason Dreux.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 15:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Montpensier Moderne.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 15:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Blason Bourbon Moderne.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 15:29, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Louis de Vendôme.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 15:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Blason Courtenay.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 16:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Anjou Constantinople.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Anjou Tarente.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 16:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Charles Robert Hongrie.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 16:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Charles-Martel Hongrie.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 16:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Armoirie André Hongrie.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 16:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Jacques II de la Marche.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 16:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Blason Joinville 52.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
180.214.233.19 12:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Blason Criel sur Mer.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Oedipe23 (talk) 05:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Armoiries André Hongrie.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
The White Lion (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Albret.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2001:448A:11A0:1994:C4B0:7100:8CF0:4D76 09:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Armoiries Charles Anjou av 1246.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2001:448A:11A2:1845:354B:E29:7C93:3B2 14:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)