User talk:RaveDog
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Brackenheim.ogg was uncategorized on 3 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Richtigen kategorien[edit]
hallo!
vergehst du nicht richtigen Kategorien benutzen.
Was habe ich gemacht hier und hier
Du hast hier : Category:German_pronunciationQuahadi Añtó 11:39, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear RaveDog, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
|
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear RaveDog, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
|
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]
Hallo RaveDog,
in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.
Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.
In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.
Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.
Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.
( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)
Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]
Hallo RaveDog,
nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.
Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.
Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.
Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.
( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)
|
File:Josef Rudolf Mengele.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bossanoven (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Josef Rudolf Mengele.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bossanoven (talk) 22:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Josef Rudolf Mengele.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bossanoven (talk) 19:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Mass deletion of your uploads[edit]
If you don't like the way the files sound; you can always create a new version and re-upload the file instead. All those files are in use and removing them would damage several projects. Cheers, Ruthven (msg) 19:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:Richard Böch.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:18, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fernmeldeturm Bitburg 2022-02-05.jpeg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Fernmeldeturm Bitburg 2022-02-05.jpeg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fernmeldeturm Bitburg 2022-02-05.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:BankIlsfeld2023 2.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:BankIlsfeld2023 2.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:BankIlsfeld2023 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:DorastiftIlsfeld2023 2.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:DorastiftIlsfeld2023 2.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:DorastiftIlsfeld2023 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:EAutoParkplatzIlsfeld2023 2.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:EAutoParkplatzIlsfeld2023 2.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:EAutoParkplatzIlsfeld2023 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:WegweiserIlsfeld2023 1.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:WegweiserIlsfeld2023 1.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:WegweiserIlsfeld2023 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:KelterIlsfeld2023 1.jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:KelterIlsfeld2023 1.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:KelterIlsfeld2023 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Things named after[edit]
Hallo, das mit den Benennungen ist oft komplizierter als es auf den ersten Blick aussieht. Diverse Hirschstraßen sind eigentlich nach Gasthäusern benannt und nur indirekt nach dem Tier. Die Badener Straße in Gernsbach führt nach Baden-Baden, das bis 1931 nur "Baden" hieß. Diese Massenkategorisierungen erzeugen manchmal nur Scheinwissen. Sitacuisses (talk) 11:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Lieber RaveDog, vielen Dank für Deine (Fleiß-)Arbeit! IMHO bringt diese Syntax einen großen Mehrwert. Einmal sortiert beflügelt es, es zu vervollständigen. Und dann wird es etwas Großes, Ganzes! Ich freue mich auch, dass Du Kategorien den Vorzug vor Begriffsklärungsseiten gibst, denn dann wird es einfacher bei Wikidata. Fühl Dich bestärkt und weiter so ;) MfG Alter Fritz (talk) 08:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Alter Fritz, vielen Dank für deine Wertschätzung. Da macht das Arbeiten noch viel mehr Spaß. :-) RaveDog (talk) 14:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Hallo RaveDog, ich habe Steig nicht mehr in Stein eingeordnet. Außerdem müsste Category Rain eher Category Croft heißen, denn der deutsche Rain hat nichts mit dem englischen Regen zu tun. Was meinst Du? Category:Rain streets in Germany. MfG Alter Fritz (talk) 10:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Natürlich hat Rain nichts mit Regen zu tun. Das hab ich auch nie behauptet. RaveDog (talk) 12:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Gerade die ungarischen, polnischen und tschechischen Äquivalente sind seit Jahren im Stil des eigensprachlichen Grundwort mit folgendem englischem "Street" aufgebaut. Da scheint es akzeptiert zu sein. RaveDog (talk) 12:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, danke! Das war für mich erstmal ungewohnt... MfG Alter Fritz (talk) 15:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Gerade die ungarischen, polnischen und tschechischen Äquivalente sind seit Jahren im Stil des eigensprachlichen Grundwort mit folgendem englischem "Street" aufgebaut. Da scheint es akzeptiert zu sein. RaveDog (talk) 12:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, aber nicht alles was deutsch ist auch in Germany :-) --lg aus AT -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 07:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ups, das war im Eifer des Gefechts passiert. Ich guck eigentlich, dass ich AT-Städte in AT-Straßen-Kategorien reinpacke, sofern es genügend gleichnamige Straßen in AT gibt. Grüße :-) RaveDog (talk) 12:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ups der Eifer war zu groß :-) ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 16:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ich achte in Zukunft darauf :-) RaveDog (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ups der Eifer war zu groß :-) ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 16:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Sortierschlüssel[edit]
Hallo! Danke für deine Bemühungen. Achte bitte auf die korrekte und hier verbreitete Sortierung. "Dülmen" wird als "Dulmen" einsortiert, nicht als "Duelmen". "Überlingen" auch als "Uberlingen" und nicht "Ueberlingen". Das ist im Grunde die Sortierung, die auch der Duden nutzt. Danke! --XRay 💬 12:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Commons-Cat "Roads and streets in Germany named after female first names"[edit]
Hallo RaveDog, die Straße "Kätchenort" in Bad Salzuflen hat nichts mit einer Käthe oder ähnlichen Person zu tun. Der Name leitet sich von den dort früher lebenden Wildkatzen ab. Gruß, UNTERMVIERENBERGE-2 (talk) 21:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Du erhältst einen Orden![edit]
|
Der Fleißorden |
| Für die vielen Kategorien in die du meine Bilder einsortiert hast. Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 08:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC) |
- Vielen lieben Dank. :-) RaveDog (talk) 09:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
An award for you![edit]
|
The Commons Barnstar | |
| Just a little thank you for all your categorizing work! Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 14:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much :-) RaveDog (talk) 00:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
FYI[edit]
Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/12/Category:Esslingen-Pliensauvorstadt. - Jmabel ! talk 23:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category[edit]
When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Landkreis Heilbronn in the 20st century. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 04:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help. :-) RaveDog (talk) 16:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Kategorie-Editions-Tipps[edit]
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Structures_in_Landkreis_T%C3%BCbingen_by_function u. a. Such-Umschaltung nach Kategorien
Hi, Category:Doors in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis by building function ist mE etwas konfus. Erstens ist da eine infinite Kategorienschleife: Category:Doors in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis by building function beinhaltet Category:Doors in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis by building function beinhaltet Category:Doors in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis by building function ... Kategorien sollten sich nicht selbst enthalten. Weitere Fälle gerne unter User:Herzi_Pinki/cat_circles (so habe ich zu dieser Kat gefunden und es betrifft weitere von dir angelegte Kategorien).
Dann ist die Reihenfolge verkehrt:
- Category:Doors in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis by building function gehört nicht als Teil zu Category:Church doors in Baden-Württemberg, sondern die Unterkategorie Category:Church doors in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis gehört zu Category:Church doors in Baden-Württemberg (Test: Ist jede Tür im Rhein-Neckar-Kreis eine Kirchentür in Baden-Württemberg? Nein, es gibt auch andere Türen.).
- Category:Doors in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis by building function gehört nicht als Teil zu Category:Church elements in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, sondern die Unterkategorie Category:Church doors in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis gehört zu Category:Church elements in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis (Test: Ist jede Tür im Rhein-Neckar-Kreis ein Bauteil einer Kirche im Rhein-Neckar-Kreis? Nein, es gibt auch andere Türen, nicht an Kirchen.).
Richtig wäre mE Category:Doors in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis by building function gehört zu Category:Doors in Rhein-Neckar-Kreis, Category:Doors in Baden-Württemberg by building function (eig. Category:Doors in Baden-Württemberg by building function by district). Sonst habe ich zu der endlosen systematischen Zersplitterung von Kategoriebäumen eine zurückhaltendere Ansicht. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)