User talk:Roland zh

Roland zh is taking a wikibreak.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This is a Wikimedia Commons user page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikimedia Commons, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Roland_zh.

العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ Frysk ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ ລາວ ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ 正體中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Wikimedia Commons

===>>> Hi, just uploads, 'reasons' see Category talk:India as of 01:31, 6. Nov. 2012‎ and Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems as of 18:29, 7. Nov. 2012‎ and among others again between 15 January and 21 January 2015 {no single answer by admins, please see related comments, no offence, or p.e. [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Quality_images_of_Andhra_Pradesh that, that etc, thus updated Roland zh (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)}‎], but please still have fun :-))[reply]

Hallo Roland zh,

es gibt ja eine Reihe von Ständeordnung-Abbildungen, aber die von Ihnen hochgeladene war mir neu, und ich würde sie gerne bei Unterrichtsmaterialien einsetzen. Könnten Sie mir bestätigen, dass das erlaubt und möglich ist?

Freundliche Grüße

F. Stock 217.24.225.241 16:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber Roland

Wir möchten Deine Fotografie auf unserer Website www.phaenomena.ch auf der Seite "Geschichte" publizieren (mit Angabe des Urheberrechts).

Ich wäre froh, wenn Du Dich bei uns melden würdest, damit wir die Nennung korrekt hinkriegen. Danke!

Herzlich,

Marc

marc.zutter@phaenomena.ch 176.127.150.136 11:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Wikimedia Commons user page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikimedia Commons, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Roland_zh.

العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ Frysk ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ ລາວ ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ 正體中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Wikimedia Commons

This user has been on Wikimedia Commons for
16 years, 11 months and 7 days

750,000+

This user has made over 750,000 contributions to Wikimedia projects.

640,000+

This user has made over 640,000 contributions to Commons.

This user has uploaded 25000 own photos to Commons.

Bild des Tages

Sonnenuntergang in Fernando de Noronha, Pernambuco, Brasilien. +/− [de], +/− [en]

02:20 ^[update]

Commons clock - made from this set ^[update]

Babel user information

de

Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.

als-3

Dä Benutzer verfüegt über sehr gueti Kenntnis vom Alemannische.

en-2

This user is able to contribute with an intermediate level of English.

fr-1

Cette personne peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français.

it-1

Questo utente può contribuire con un italiano di livello semplice.

Users by language

Saturday

9

March

2024

... and a closing Hi, getting too 'tired' to be an much more 'active' Wikimedian then own-work uploads and so meaningful South India related edits in strictly reduced dimensions – all files on watchlist, really no need for 'personal' notifications. Have fun, thx and regards, Roland zh 17:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC) {update Roland zh (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This is a Wikimedia Commons user page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikimedia Commons, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Roland_zh.

العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ Frysk ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ ລາວ ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ 正體中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Wikimedia Commons

Archivieren[edit]

Hallo Roland, Bitte entferne keine Warnhinweise etc. von deiner Diskussionsseite. Du kannst gerne deine Diskussionsseite archivieren (siehe: Commons:Diskussionsseiten), aber stelle dabei sicher, das alle bisherigen Warnhinweise dort verlinkt bzw. im Archiv aufgeführt sind. Viele Grüße--Steinsplitter (talk) 19:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

und etwas stimmt mit deiner Signatur nicht, diese linkt nicht auf deine Benutzerseite, Viele Grüße und danke für deine Beiträge auf Wikimedia Commons--Steinsplitter (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Steinsplitter, bitte erklär mir den Sinn oder Kontext Deines o.e. Hinweises, den ich beim besten Willen nicht verstehe ??

So aus dem Gedächnis heraus, dürften wir beide mW bislang keine gemeinsamen Berührungspunkte innerhalb von Wikimedia gehabt haben, kann mich aber täuschen ....

Mir ist zudem keine Wikimedia 'Vorschrift'/'Richtlinie' betreffend 'Archivierung betreffs Benutzer-Seiten' bekannt, da mE ja die 'Version history' >jeden< Edit de facto auf den Servern von Wikimedia 'archiviert'. Mit meiner Signatur ist übrigens alles i.O. Dankeschön und Gruss, Roland 19:42, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Wir sind uns bissher noch nicht begegnet, war lediglich ein imho netter Hinweiss ;-). Ganz in anlehnung an Commons:Diskussionsseiten und Template:Dont_remove_warnings/de. Viele Grüße--Steinsplitter (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Steinsplitter, also

nein, die mE eigentlich klar gestellte Frage hast Du wirklich nicht beantwortet: Die Frage ist nach dem 'Warum', nicht ob wir uns schon 'begegnet' sein könnten ...
Zudem, gerade aufgrund Deines Hinweises auf 'Archivierung' von Dir als offensichltich Administrator, warum nimmst Du gleich zwei Reverts vor, einen auf Deiner Diskussionseite - wir haben offensichlich 'gleichzeitig' editiert - und zwei Minuten danach hier ?
Offen gesagt, bin ich enttäuscht über Dein Verhalten notabene als Administratur und verstehe Deinen 'Hinweis' weiterhin hin nicht ... 'Augenzwinkern' hin oder her, danke ich immer noch für Beantwortung meiner Frage ...
Eine weitere Fragegleich dazu: Wie kann ich meine Benutzerseite 'sperren' auch aufgrund wiederholter solcher 'kryptischer' Mitteilungen sperren lassen?

Zu dieser Frage genügt dann tatsächlich nur ein Wikilink, dankeschön ;-)

Viele Grüsse, Roland 20:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Auf einen Netten Hinweiss eine solche reaktion hätte ich mir nicht erwartet. Zwinkern sollte freundlichkeit vermitteln. Ich habe sogar auf die Template-Seite verlinkt. Anscheinend bin ich hier auf deiner Disk nicht wilkommen)--Steinsplitter (talk) 20:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe rücksprache mit einen anderen Administrator gehalten und werde deine Fragen aufgrund deiner Reaktion auf einen höflichen Hinweis nicht beantworten. Du darfst diesen Disk-Abschnitt gerne entferenen, da du dies anscheinend so handhabts. Grüße--Steinsplitter (talk) 20:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Steinsplitter, weiterhin ohne jegliche Ironie oder Unhöflichkeit meinerseits gemeint und ohne die 'Zusammenfassung' meines Edits zu 'verschleiern':

Nein, im Gegenteil, diesen thread lasse ich so stehen, da er für sich spricht und ein mir 'unterstelltes Verhalten' wohl eher zu negieren scheint und wohl auf pragmatischte Art und Weise 'erklären' hilft. Dankeschön und liebe Grüsse, Roland 20:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

@Roland, ich habe deinem Wunsch nach reiflicher Abwägung nun entsprochen, ihn aber, da eine solche Sperrung auf einem Gemeinschaftsprojekt — außer bei massivem Vandalismus o.ä. — äusserst ungewöhnlich ist, meinen Kollegen auf COM:AN mitgeteilt. Nach der Seitensperre habe ich deine busy-Dublette durch einen protected-Baustein ersetzt, der diejenigen, die hier anlanden um mit dir zu kommunizieren, über die Seitensperre informiert. Wenn du einen anderen Sperrgrund als den von mir angegebenen bevorzugst, dann gib mir Bescheid.
Da mir die Vorgeschichte der obigen "Kommunikation" nicht geläufig ist, nur 2 allgemeine Anmerkungen: 1) Admins kümmern sich u.a. um die Einhaltung der Projektspielregeln, unabhängig davon, ob sie selbst mit den jeweils Betreffenden "Berührungspunkte" hatten. 2) "Mit meiner Signatur ist übrigens alles i.O." — nicht wirklich. Die standardmäßige Verlinkung von Benutzer- und Benutzerdiskussionsseite in der Benutzersignatur, die du irgendwie abgeschaltet hast, dient der leichteren Kommunikation mit dem jeweiligen Benutzer. Hinzu kommt bei dir, dass deine aktuelle Signatur nicht deinem Benutzernamen/konto entspricht und deshalb deine Edits auf jeglichen Diskussions/Kommunikationsseiten mit einem anderen Konto, z.B. User:Roland, verwechselt werden können. Letzteres ist keineswegs "in Ordnung", selbst wenn es bei dir, mangels Edits auf solche Seiten, nicht groß ins Gewicht fällt. --Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

redirects after filemove[edit]

Please don't tag redirects of recently moved images for speedy deletion - we won't delete them. There's no need for deletion and possible reusers may then point to a non-existing image. Redirects are only deleted for very recently uploaded images. Thank you. --Denniss (talk) 22:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mukunda Software Inc Logo.jpg[edit]

Hi, please do not nominate a {{PD-textlogo}} for speedy deletion. Jcb (talk) 00:12, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Western Ghats Categories[edit]

Hi! I can't follow the reason given for speedy deletion. Help me out, will ya? :-) --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now I gotcha! Took me a while....

Done

--Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:50, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected your talk page[edit]

I have removed protection from your talk page, as all editors should be contactable by way of their talk page if they are active on this project. Having a protected talk page is not conducive to encouraging discussion among editors. russavia (talk) 22:13, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mysterious copyright violation[edit]

Care to comment at Commons:Village_pump#I_cant_get_details_of_why_my_image_was_deleted._Except_that_it_says_copy_right_violation_.5Bwhat_violation_.3F.5D? Thank you, Multichill (talk) 17:35, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Roland, ich weiß nicht ob du die oben verlinkte Diskussion auf VP schon gelesen hast. Du solltest es auf jeden Fall tun und möglichst auch dazu Stellung nehmen; ggf. auf Deutsch, kann dann jemand übersetzen. Auch mir ist schon oft aufgefallen, dass du "imho authorship not clear [see metadata] and not in use" häufig als Standardbegründung zur copyvio-Markierung benutzt. Ich rätsele dann auch immer, was du eigentlich meinst, denn meist hat die Datei dann keine oder unauffällige Metadaten. (Fehlende Metadaten können zwar ein Hinweis auf copyvio sein, müssen aber nicht, weil manche Hochlader ihre Bilder bewusst ohne Metadaten hochladen.) Das "not in use" ist zudem völlig irrelevant für den copyvio-Aspekt. Ich bzw. auch jeder andere die Datei bearbeitende Admin muss dann selbst noch ermitteln, ob wirklich eine copyvio vorliegt (oder höchstwahrscheinlich ist), was zusätzliche Arbeit bedeutet.

Du solltest daher in Zukunft Dateien, bei denen nur ein vager Verdacht auf mögliche Copyvio besteht, zur regulären Löschung vorschlagen (einfach mittels Toolbox-Link "Löschung vorschlagen"). Wenn es sich um viele oder alle Dateien von einem einzelnden Benutzer handelt, kannst du auch eine Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request stellen, Help:VisualFileChange.js benutzen oder den Fall auf COM:AN vortragen, damit er diskutiert bzw. ggf. weitere Evidenz beigetragen werden kann. Einen Schnelllöschantrag solltest du nur stellen, wenn du einen konkreten Hinweis auf eine wahrscheinliche Urheberrechtsverletzung vorlegen kannst (üblicherweise ein Link auf eine vor dem Upload bestehende externe Nutzung). Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, dankeschön für Deine Hinweise: Hab' mitgelesen, kann aber keinen konstruktiven Beitrag dazu leisten, da ich mich an DIE genannte Datei bei üblicherweise einigen Hundert Edits pro Tag beim besten Willen nicht erinnern kann.

Mit dem fraglichen Uploader habe ich indirekt hingegen Kontakt gehabt und für eine ähnlich geartete Datei (Taj Mahal) ich glaube gestern einen Löschantrag gestellt.

Die Anträge nehme ich nicht voreilig vor, konzentriere mich dabei gerade nur auf die aktuell kategorisierten Medien in den "India"-related Hauptkategorien, d.h. üblicherweise neue Uploads oder Kategorisierunen durch Dritte, seltener bei Umkategorisierunen wie aktuell "Temples' in Karnataka und Andhra-Pradesh. Bislang scheinen deutlich über 90% 'meiner' Meldungen zu vermeintlichen Copyright-Verletzungen meist umgehend gelöscht worden, der überwiegende Rest meist rasch, sodass mein 'Spürsinn' so schlecht auch wieder nicht sein dürfte ;-)

Zudem gehe ich davon aus, dass vor Löschung die/der damit betraute AdministratorIn einen Plausibilitäts-Check vornimmt, d.h. 'unbegründete' Meldungen wieder zurückgesetzt worden sind.

Um aber inskünftig mögliche 'Konflikte' auf ein absolutes Minimum zu beschränken, überlasse ich gerne mit 'sofortiger Wirkung' auch meinem 'Frustrations-Index' zuliebe gerne wieder anderen WikimedianerInnen diese verantwortungsvolle Tätigkeit :-)
Vor einigen Minuten für diesbezüglich Engagierte zu prüfunden Uploads sind mir u.a. hier und hier aufgefallen.

Betreffs 'Löschanträge' hast Du ja selbst miterlebt, was drei Löschanträge von flickr-Uploads zu Kleinkindern aus Indien 'eingebracht' haben, sodass ich Dich bei dieser Gelegenheit freundlich bitte, soweit möglich den 'Status Quo' von Juni 2013 wieder einzurichten :-)

Liebe Grüsse, Roland zh 18:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC) [Roland zh 19:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Zusatz]

Category:Sanskrit script[edit]

This category name is unfortunately somewhat misleading; see note on category page... AnonMoos (talk) 01:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See now also Category talk:Sanskrit script?... -- AnonMoos (talk) 01:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Prathap_K._Pothan[edit]

Category:Prathap_K._Pothan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 05:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changes reverted[edit]

I have reverted your changes here and here, as you have removed all links to them being aviation photographers, and being aviation photographers from India, plus these are not Flickr streams. Cheers, russavia (talk) 20:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:N. A. Naseer[edit]

There is a related talk about Category talk:N. A. Naseer here: User talk:Sreejithk2000#?????--Praveen:talk 15:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Keep it up !!!! Perumalism Chat 17:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kedar Joshi[edit]

Hi Roland, I recently closed the following two DRs by you, here and here. This closure has been contested on my talk page here. Would you please consider commenting in that thread? Thanks! -FASTILY 20:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Switzerland in art[edit]

Hallo Roland. Herzlichen Dank für die organisierung und die ordnung die du in der Kategorie "Switzerland in art" geschaffen hast. Nur eins: wenn du eine neue Kategorie machst über die Künstlerischen Darstellungen einer Ortschaft, dann vergiss bitte nicht sie auch in die betreffende Ortschaft zu kategorisieren [1]. Sonst fehlt sie dann genau dort wo sie am ehesten sein muss und zu suchen und finden sollte. Die richtigen Kategorien zu erteilen kann im ersten Moment etwas kompliziert scheinen, ist es aber nicht. Wenn du den Titel in zwei trennst, dann werden sie dir schon vorgesagt. Z.B. "Locarno in art" sagt dir schon dass es in der Kategorie "Locarno" vorkommen muss, und dann auch in der Kategorie "Art". Diese letzte musst du selber identifizieren, es kann "Ticino in art" sein oder, falls diese fehlt, dann eben die obere Kategorie, also "Switzerland in art". Normalerweise eine Kategorie die nur in einer eizigen Kategorie kategorisiert ist, ist immer etwas verdächtig... Herzlichen Dank für deine Arbeit! Alles Beste, --DenghiùComm (talk) 06:36, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo DenghiùComm, dankeschön für Deine Rückmeldung. Die kurze Organisierung von "Switzerland in art" und dem unmittelbar vorausgegangen etwas aufwändiger "Historical images of Switzerland" konnte ich nicht zum Abschluss bringen, da ich vorgängig einige 'dringende Pendenzen' abarbeiten musste und aufgrund aktueller Entwicklungen wohl bis auf weiteres nicht mehr dazu kommen werde.

Die Kategorisierung wie von Dir geschildert ist mir natürlich bewusst, und wie Dir aufgefallen sein dürfte, fehlen zudem noch einige 'wichtige' Städte, d.h. es war nur ein allererster Anfang (habe es jeweils als 'just startup' kommentiert), und über das weitere Vorgehen war ich mir zudem noch unschlüssig.

Vielleicht möchtest Du dem ja sicherlich deutlich kompetenter als ich es könnte nachgehen, da es abgesehen von 'Zürich' und 'St. Gallen' eher am Rande meiner bisherigen Schweiz-bezogenen Tätigkeit bei Wikimedia Commons lag, was mich sehr freuen und 'Kapazitäten' für anderes liesse :-) Liebe Grüsse, Roland zh 13:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Carnatic musicians[edit]

Hi, IMHO adding categories like this is not a good practice. Please see File talk:Saraswati.jpg also. A simillar case also can be seen here. Regards --Praveen:talk 06:54, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praveen, imho female artist paintings to categorise as Category:Female Carnatic music performers seems to be your issue. As you do not agree, please feel free to re-categorise the imho handful (nevertheless, Sarasvati imho seems to be one) related media :-) Thanks and regards, Roland zh 13:20, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

I am not a native English speaker, If any of my usage is offensive against you, I am really sorry. :-(--Praveen:talk 12:12, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praveen, the same for me, i.e. also not being an English-language speaker ;-) There's no reason to be sorry :-)) Best regards, Roland zh 18:30, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Signatures_of_people_from_India_(low_quality)[edit]

Signatures of people from India (low quality) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2013[edit]

Lieber WLM Teilnehmer, liebe WLM Teilnehmerin,

wir freuen uns, Ihnen mitzuteilen, dass sich mindestens eines der von ihnen hochgeladenen Bilder für die engere Auswahl des nationalen oderi internationalen Wettbewerbs qualifiziert hat (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2013_in_Switzerland/Highlighted_pictures).

Die 10 asugezeichneten Fotografien werden während der Wiki Loves Monuments Zeremonie, am 30.Novemer, bekanntgegeben.

Diese Award Show findet in der Nationalbibliothek (Hallwylstrasse 15, 3003 Bern) statt und dauert von 11:00Uhr bis ca 16:00Uhr. Im Rahmen dieser Veranstaltung erwartet sie ein spannendes Rahmenprogramm: Ein gemeinsames Mittagessen sowie eine geführte Tour durch das eidgenössische Archiv für Denkmalpflege, eine Ausstellung der ausgezeichneten WikiLovesMonuments Bilder - mit ergänzenden Bilder aus der Archivwelt der Nationalbibliothek sowie Workshops bzgl. Wikipedia und Wikimedia Commons und eine Schreibwerkstatt. Für die Veranstaltung können Sie sich hier anmelden: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1VDSYgJ4yzxuGgJN4Qhnxw79qYtoOg_fQY2DFCLmbm4Q/viewform

Für weitere Informationen besuchen Sie die Website unter http://wikilovesmonuments.ch/de oder schreiben Sie uns unter info@wikimedia.ch.

Beste Grüsse und wir freuen uns, Sie am 30.November in Bern begrüssen zu dürfen, Das Organisationskommitte

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Roland zh,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Herrliberger[edit]

Hallo Roland zh; mir ist erst jetzt aufgefallen, dass du vor ein paar Jahren bei einigen Stichen von David Herrliberger nach Emanuel Büchel die Kategorie Category:David Herrliberger entfernt hast. Das scheint mir verkehrt - gewiss, Herrliberger hat diese Stiche nach Vorlagen von Büchel angefertigt, aber es sind eben doch Stiche von Herrliberger. Sie unterscheiden sich auch durchaus in einigen Details von Büchels Zeichnungen. Die Rolle von Herrliberger als Stecher ist meines Erachtens auf jeden Fall bedeutend genug, um seine Büchel-Stiche auch unter ihm zu kategorisieren (neben Büchel, versteht sich). Gestumblindi (talk) 22:50, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Du hast die Herrliberger-Kategorie auch bei Stichen entfernt, bei denen Herrliberger nur der Verleger, nicht jedoch der Stecher war, z.B. File:Herrliberger Solothurn.jpg (Stich von J.R. Metzger nach Büchel) - da hast du natürlich recht, da gehört Herrliberger dann nicht als Kategorie rein. Aber dort, wo er der Stecher ist, schon... Gestumblindi (talk) 23:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Rapperswil - Fasnacht - Seequai - Fischmarktplatz 2012-02-12 16-10-01 (SX230).JPG

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Roland zh,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

File:Rajkumar RK2284.JPG[edit]

File:Rajkumar RK2284.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 13:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hindi Wikipedia tutorials[edit]

Hey Roland, thanks again for adding the videos I had uploaded under the proper category. But I found you have removed the template. All these videos are part of a project "Learn to edit Hindi Wikipedia". So I have added the template again. --Subhashish Panigrahi (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Subhashish Panigrahi, you're welcome. An excellent idea to introducuce that project :-) Sorry about the template, i'did not realize because some people used same procedure to categorize. So you agree, i removed the related categories [Category:Learn to edit Hindi Wikipedia] and [Category:Hindi Wikipedia], so we don't 'over-categorise? If not, what about to add just [Category:Learn to edit Hindi Wikipedia]. Thx and best regards, Roland zh 18:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Hey Roland, I agree. What I am trying to create is something like this. This will be the main category under which Category:Learn to edit Hindi Wikipedia will be a subcategory. As Instructional videos on using Hindi Wikipedia‎ will include all the instructional videos that will include the videos beyond the scope of even this project. Please let me upload the remaining videos and categorise and keep them properly. Probably after I am done with these 10 videos you could suggest me for changes. I respect your spirit but I am afraid to inform that I am not being able to properly arrange everything because of the immediate changes. Cheers! --Subhashish Panigrahi (talk) 07:53, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Subhashish Panigrahi, i'm sorry to 'force' you; please take all the time you need :-) My intention is just a little assistance for your excellent idea/project and to establish the related categories and to integrate (as of Jan 2014) the South Indian categories Category:Learn to edit Malayalam Wikipedia and Category:Learn to edit Malayalam Wikipedia, as well to add the related Wikimedia PDF's und presentation slides. Please feel absolutely free to go on as you prefer :-) Best regards, Roland zh 18:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Category:Schönenwirt[edit]

Hallo Roland zh, Du bist doch aus dieser Gegend → Category talk:Schönenwirt. Was sagst Du dazu? Gruss --Schofför (talk) 11:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Panoramafreiheit Kircheninnenaufnahmen[edit]

Lieber Roland zh ich konnte die rechtliche Streitfrage zu den Innenaufnahmen von Kirchen nun definitiv klären: Meine juristischen Recherchen in der einschlägigen Literatur hat klar ergeben, dass National- und Ständerat mit der Gesetzesänderung von 1992 die Panoramafreiheit auch auf Innenräume ausdehnen wollten. Dass die Gesetzesänderung im gedruckten französischen Gesetzestext vergessen wurde, ist juristisch irrelevant, denn in der für die Abstimmung im Parlament relevanten Marginale wurde die Änderung auch in der französichen Fassung aufgeführt. Auch mehrere von mir gefragte im Urheberrecht bewandte Rechtsanwälte haben diese Rechtsauffassung bestätigt und die kantanolen Kirchenordnungen (Bern, Solothurn und Zürich), welche das Fotografieren in den Kirchen, wenn es nicht explizit verboten wird, ausserhalb der Gottesdienste explizit erlauben, wären ja rechtswidrig, wenn man in den Kircheninnenräumen nicht fotografieren dürfte. Dann wären ja auch alle Konfirmationsfotos usw. rechtswirdig, sobald da etwa ein Kirchenfenster abgebildet ist ... - genau das wollte der Gestzgeber aber mit der Panoramafreiheit verindern. Ich schreibe das nochmals Dir persönlich, da Du besonders viele und besonders schöne solche Bilder gemacht hast und diese dürfen also definitiv bleiben. Man sollte allerdings nebst der normalen Lizenz in allen betroffenen Bildern gelegentlich noch folgende Schablone einfügen (sonst stellt dann in einigen Monaten wieder irgendwer, der diese Diskussionen nicht mitbekommen hat, einen neuen Löschantrag): {{Fop-Switzerland}}. Ich hoffe ich konnte hier etwas helfen. Mit herzlichen Grüssen DidiWeidmann (talk) 21:14, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber Didier, dankeschön vielmals für Deine Abklärungen und Deine Rückmeldung - die von mir mit-initiierte Diskussion ist mitverfolgt worden (ein Upload meinerseits), sodass eine persönliche Mitteilung gar nicht nötig gewesen wäre, dankeschön umsomehr.

'Beitragen' konnte ich aus rechtlicher Sicht nichts, sodass ich mich weiterer Kommentare enthalten habe.

Im Vertrauen auf Deine juristischen Fachkenntnisse werde ich gerne die CH-Vorlage {FOP} versuchsweise (eigentlich nicht mein 'Ding') entsprechend ergänzen und danach eine Kürzestrückmeldung auf der talk page hinterlassen. 'Fachleute' wie Bxxx11 können sich dann ja auch noch 'einbringen'; ich vermeide aber solche 'Begegnungen' wenn immer möglich und werde ansonsten zum Thema keine sachbezogenen 'Beiträge' leisten ;-) Herzliche und dankbare Grüsse, Roland zh 17:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

So klar ist die Situation überhaupt nicht! Meiner Meinung nach irrt Didi leider. Ich möchte auf den ausführlichen Beitrag von Pajz, der m.E. von hoher juristischer Kompetenz ist, auf de:Diskussion:Panoramafreiheit hinweisen, in dem Didis Standpunkt m.E. durch eine ausführliche Literaturübersicht ziemlich demontiert wird: de:Diskussion:Panoramafreiheit#Literaturübersicht. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Richtig, denn DidiWeidmann Interpretation stützt sich auf eine Minderheitenmeinung. Es verneien einige Komentare sogar ausdrücklich dies Auslegung der Panoramafreiheitregel für Kircheninnenräumen. --Bobo11 (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

duplicates and file type[edit]

Just to let you know that you nominated a .tif as a duplicate of .jpg for speedy deletion. I have rejected on grounds of file type, though if you think that it should progress, then a normal DR is the route to follow. Personally, I feel that we have capacity for both file types. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marked just as {duplicate|File:xxxxx.tif}, not directly as {speedydelete}, that's all from my side – please see also User talk:Fæ as of March 2/3, 2014, Roland zh (talk) 11:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The duplicate tag IS a speedy deletion tag, the .jpg version was correctly presented in the "other version" section. --Denniss (talk) 13:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the category maintenance work on my uploads. J e e 02:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Jkadavoor, you're welcome, and i learned about the fascinating Flora of Kerala, best regards, Roland zh (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elefanten[edit]

Lieber Roland, siehst Du, genau das wollte ich auch schreiben (Elephants in the Periyar-NP), aber diese Kategorie gibt es eben noch nicht! Liebe Grüße --Ziegler175 (talk) 19:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your complaints about my work have been heeded.[edit]

Hello,

Sorry I offended you so. I categorized 4,653 images without categories in the four months I was active here, receiving no complaints except from you. I was learning. But I understand you were highly offended to a point where I feel I must stop my work here. So I have.

Thanks for letting me know how you feel. Regards, Parabolooidal (talk) 18:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rose 'Gloire de Dijon'[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Duftrosengarten_Rapperswil_-_Gloire_de_Dijon_KL_Jacotot_1853_2010-08-29_16-15-18.JPG error in determining the roses http://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=2.2975 Dmitriy Konstantinov (talk)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Abderitestatos (talk) 14:21, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ranakpur_Jain_Temple[edit]

Ranakpur Jain Temple has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 15:52, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Interior_of_Ranakpur_Jain_Temple[edit]

Interior of Ranakpur Jain Temple has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 17:03, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM - Mangalyaan) ISRO spacecraft.gif[edit]

File:Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM - Mangalyaan) ISRO spacecraft.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

— Huntster (t @ c) 01:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

> File talk:Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM - Mangalyaan) ISRO spacecraft.gif, 77.58.180.54 02:38, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mars Orbiter Mission ISRO Raumschiff.svg[edit]

File:Mars Orbiter Mission ISRO Raumschiff.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

— Huntster (t @ c) 01:11, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

> File talk:Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM - Mangalyaan) ISRO spacecraft.gif, 77.58.180.54 02:38, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM - Mangalyaan) ISRO spacecraft.gif[edit]

File:Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM - Mangalyaan) ISRO spacecraft.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Huntster (t @ c) 02:46, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mars Orbiter Mission ISRO Raumschiff.svg[edit]

File:Mars Orbiter Mission ISRO Raumschiff.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Huntster (t @ c) 02:46, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aathal-Seegräben - Sauriermuseum Aathal, Zürichstrasse - Unter Aathal 202 2011-09-28 12-40-38.jpg[edit]

File:Aathal-Seegräben - Sauriermuseum Aathal, Zürichstrasse - Unter Aathal 202 2011-09-28 12-40-38.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 10:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil categories[edit]

Hi, is it possible/ acceptable to categorize in Tamil. --Thamizhpparithi Maari (talk) 20:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thamizhpparithi Maari, honestly i do not know exactly – i've been told before to establish categories normally in 'English', p.e. my Mother tongue uses letters as "é", "ö" etc and in the beginning all related categories have been deleted.

Within Wikimedia Common imho it's still preferred to establish English language categories, because the are claimed to be more international and therefore much more Wikimedians may understand, what i in principle (there are imo exceptions allowed) support.

But what about to add p.e. Tamil language descriptions to an English-language category, so i usually also do (p.e. German, before also in French), please see p.e. Category:Kerala and many mores :-) Kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 22:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lord_Eligin's_tomb[edit]

Category:Lord_Eligin's_tomb has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- Deadstar (msg) 10:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Wiki4Alps edition[edit]

WLM CH (Deutsch)

Liebe/r Teilnehmer/in des Wettbewerbs Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2014,

Herzlichen Dank dass du zu Wiki4Alps beigetragen und deine Bilder mit der ganzen Welt geteilt hast.

Im Rahmen des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs sind über 2500 Bilder von Kulturgütern in alpinen Regionen auf Wikimedia Commons geladen worden. Und die Jury ist daran, diese Bilder zu bewerten.

Wir kommen so bald wie möglich wieder auf Dich zu, um die Gewinner bekannt zu geben.

Auf der Wettbewerbsseite http://wiki4alps.ch findet ihr alle notwendigen Informationen, oder ihr könnt euch auch gerne an info@wikimedia.ch wenden.

Mit den besten Grüssen, Das Organisationskomittee

WLM CH (Français)

Cher participant-e au concours WLM CH 2014,

Nous vous remercions de votre contribution à Wiki4Alps, et de partager vos photos avec le monde entier!

Le concours a réuni plus de 2500 photos du patrimoine culturel des Alpes et le jury a commencé l'évaluation.

Nous reviendrons bientôt pour annoncer les gagnants.

Vous trouverez sur le site web du concours http://wiki4alps.ch ou envoyez un e-mail à info@wikimedia.ch.

Avec nos salutations les meilleures, le comité d'organisation.

WLM CH (English)

Dear participants to the WLM CH contest 2014,

Thank you for having contributed to Wiki4Alps and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

The contest gathered more than 2,500 pictures of cultural heritage objects of the Alps and the jury is currently evaluating them.

We will come back soon to announce the winners.

You will find the contest's website http://wiki4alps.ch necessary information there or you may write to us using the following address: info@wikimedia.ch.

With our warmest regards, The organising committee

WLM CH (Italiano)

Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2014

Grazie per aver contribuito a Wiki4Alps e per aver condiviso le tue fotografie con tutto il mondo!

Il concorso ha collezionato più di 2.500 fotografie del patrimonio culturale delle Alpi e la giuria ha cominciato la valutazione.

Presto saranno noti i vincitori.

Per ulteriori informazioni si prega di visitare il sito web http://wiki4alps.ch o potete scrivere a info@wikimedia.ch.

Con i nostri migliori saluti, Il Comitato Organizzatore

File:Tipu death.jpg[edit]

File:Tipu death.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 16:06, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hofstetten[edit]

Hofstetten has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

FDMS 4 15:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Für die tollen Ansichten von Zollikon am Zürichsee! Aarp65 (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Wiki4Alps edition[edit]

WLM CH (Deutsch)

Liebe Teilnehmerin/Lieber Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Monuments CH

Gerne bedanken wir uns hiermit noch einmal für deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb WLM. Die Liste der Gewinner kann nun auf unserer Website sowie auch auf Wikimedia Commons eingesehen werden. Wir gratulieren den Gewinnerinnen und Gewinnern, die wir persönlich kontaktieren werden, ganz herzlich.

Der Verein Wikimedia CH trifft gerade die Vorbereitungen für Wiki Loves Earth 2015, ein Fotowettbewerb rund um das Thema Natur und Nationalparks. Dieser neue Fotowettbewerb wird bereits am 1.Mai 2015 starten. Wir freuen uns sehr, wenn ihr wieder mit dabei seid!

Mit besten Grüssen,

Das Organisationsteam

WLM CH (Français)

Cher/chère participant(e) au concours Wiki Loves Monuments CH,

La liste des gagnants est disponible sur le site ainsi que sur son pendant Wikimedia Commons! Nos félicitations aux vainqueurs, qui seront contactés séparément.

Wikimedia CH se prépare maintenant pour Wiki Loves Earth 2015, un concours photographique consacré à la nature et aux parcs, qui débutera le 1er mai prochain et auquel nous vous invitons à participer!

Meilleurs messages,

Le Comité d’organisation

WLM CH (English)

Dear Wiki Loves Monuments CH participant,

We would like to inform you that the list of winners has been published on our website as well as on Wikimedia Commons - our congratulations to the winners, who will be contacted individually.

Wikimedia CH is now gearing up for Wiki Loves Earth 2015, a photo contest dedicated to the nature and to parks.

This new contest will start on May 1st, 2015: feel free to join!

With our best regards,

The organization's committee

WLM CH (Italiano)

Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH

Vogliamo informarti che la lista dei vincitori é stata pubblicata sul nostro sito come anche su Wikimedia Commons - le nostre congratulazioni ai vincitori, che saranno contattati individualmente.

Wikimedia CH sta ora organizzando u nuovo concorso per Wiki Loves Earth 2015 dedicato alla natura e ai parchi.

Questo concorso inizierà l'1 maggio 2015: ci auguriamo di avervi tra i nostri concorrenti!

Saluti,

Il Comitato Organizzatore

Category:Ambigergudi[edit]

Category:Ambigergudi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Michael D. Gunther (talk) 22:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madonna_del_Sasso[edit]

Hello Roland, i have updated the partially incorrect description of your file Madonna_del_Sasso_-_17.03.00_0016.jpg. Wish you a nice day --Walta (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Reliefs_and_sculptures_at_the_Pancha_Rathas[edit]

Category:Reliefs_and_sculptures_at_the_Pancha_Rathas has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Michael D. Gunther (talk) 00:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cinema_of_Andhra_Pradesh[edit]

Cinema of Andhra Pradesh has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kailash29792 (talk) 05:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bots[edit]

You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks for all your work! Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 16:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geography of Agra[edit]

Hi, Just in case you come back. Regarding your edit here, it doesn't make sense IMO. This image (and others of animals) do not belong to geography. Probably a new category "Fauna of Agra" would be appropriate. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi, read accidentally that edit above mentioned, asumming not joking, but >>one single edit in november 2011 (!!!)<< it's "worth" to be "discussed" by an admin ignoring that wikimedian's wish clearly expressed in the leading info box ... instead of fixing that obviously micro mistake, btw by "Animals of Agra" ... what a xxxx...some people may that call mobbing. regards, -178.197.236.9 13:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dein Bildarchiv[edit]

Hallo Roland zh - Im Moment bin ich gerade am überarbeiten der WP-Seite Knies Kinderzoo. Habe festgestellt, dass Du da so einige Bilder erstellt hast. Ich suche zwei schöne Bilder: "Elefantenmama mit Jungem" und das gleiche mit "Giraffe". Hättest Du eventuell etwas in Deinem Bilderarchiv? Würde mich sehr freuen. Besten Dank und freundlichen Gruss vom --KusiD (talk) 07:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo KusiD, in Kürze (siehe Infobox, bin mittlerweile arg tälk-müde), nichts für ungut bitte: Für Deine Zwecke brauchbare Uploads findest Du unter Category:Knies Kinderzoo, und falls nicht exakt was Du suchts, würde sich der Kinderzoo über Deinen Besuch freuen, da meinerseits keine jugendliche Begleitung als 'Ausrede' dafür verfügbar ;-) lg vom Zürisee, Roland zh (talk) 04:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use your image[edit]

Hi Roland zh, I would like to use your image of Occupy found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:'Occupy'_Z%C3%BCrich_Lindenhof_2011-10-30_15-49-48.jpg in a brazilian TV serie entitled "Critical Uncertainties". Please email me at teka.carbonell@gmail.com so we can talk a little bit more about my project. Thanks, Teka.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-03-56 ShiftN.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Raspberry_Pi_Kit_by_IT@School[edit]

Category:Raspberry_Pi_Kit_by_IT@School has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 21:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Division_of_states_and_union_territories_of_India[edit]

Division of states and union territories of India has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

578985s (talk) 05:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Arabic_calligraphy/Inscriptions_in_India[edit]

Category:Arabic_calligraphy/Inscriptions_in_India has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 07:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no offence[edit]

I would appreciate it if you would stop using "no offence" at the beginning of your DRs. In American English, starting a sentence that way is a strong indicator that the sentence is offensive and the writer or speaker knows it and probably intends it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thx, did not know, as i really aim not to displease the uploader's intentions; I appreciate your feedback, Happy New Year, Roland zh (talk) 03:11, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2015_aerial_photographs_of_Bangalore[edit]

2015 aerial photographs of Bangalore has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 19:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jawaharlal_Nehru_in_1967[edit]

Category:Jawaharlal_Nehru_in_1967 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

FlickrWarrior (talk) 17:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete request[edit]

Please delete Category:Government Law College, Kozhikode Prof TPMS (talk) 02:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User activity Watch[edit]

Dear Roland zh, Please read the latest section at User_talk:Prof_tpms#Unacceptable_Deletion_requests_and_relocations_of_Categories and keep a watch. I and my colleagues from ml community know him as a gentle and positively nice individual. He has become much more active recently after one of our annual meets held at ml community. While we respect his dedication, efforts and contributions to WM, to me, it seems, he needs some more understanding of how categories work and why most pictures are precious on WM Commons, (not just for their presentation quality, but for the information content they might subtly provide for particular topics within WP articles). He has requested for nearly 90 deletions in one day for each of which, others may not be willing to go back and add their Keep or Oppose votes. I request you may en mass remove the delete requests and leave it for a better retrospection by others too. Thanks! ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ) (talk) 16:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ), thank you for your message and the latest informations: you're absolutely right, and I share your impressions and experiences. As you might remarked, repeatedly I tried to take his attention to the facts you mentioned (as well in reduced dimensions on EN-WP), and 'reverted' (I don't like these kind of 'education') dozens of former 'missinterpretations' of the category system within Wikimedia Commons, and (honestly) became desparate the past two months. Nevertheless, still 'fixed' hundreds of these edits, please see also the related user talk section .... and, again, the 'request' above mentioned, once more ignoring the (from my side very frustrating) overcategorization, some hints section :-((

Regarding the the 'mass removes' you mentioned: just like you, i'm just a 'normal' Wikipedian, and no Admin, hence my 'special rights' only include the renaming of files and categories, that's all. Hence, please try to act as I tried before, by re-establishing the former 'status quo', if there's a need, even by reverting (personally, I do just in 'emergency cases', p.e. the request above mentioned), but also Payambalam Beach, for instance, and probably other of the deletion requests you mentioned, referring on [User talk:Prof tpm].

What about this 'strategy' to assist his further Wikimedia Commons contributions, and would you prefer (i do, it would be fair) to move this section 'User activity Watch' also to his user talk? So you prefer, please feel free to do so, and i'll try to 'assist' so i'll have more time again, but, honestly, in 'reduced dimensions', because there was to spend a lot of time to fix those 'edits' the past weeks. In the meantime, kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Roland zh for your kind time and efforts. I understand exactly what you feel, for me too have much less time these days to go to each intricate details and try to 'retract' other's (though sincere and respectful) works. I think I and my colleagues can really make a difference by directly assisting him further by phone calls or instant messaging. I will try to contact him tomorrow (at a daytime) and explain the situation. Let us see how this evolves. Right today, I am only worried about some of the precious images getting deleted unfortunately. Many of them have been on commons for a long time and have been a matter of pride for many veteran Wikipedians. Some of them have been even used in media and possibly in textbooks! Once again, thank you very much for your efforts. WikiLove ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ) (talk) 20:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be glad to, ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ), and i also welcome your personal effort for even a personal contact; this is a really very nice and collegial assistance, my respect :-) The past minutes, i tried to support your efforts referring to these xxxx DR by {opposing}{keeping} a handful, also supported the related talk section started by you, and in the next minutes i'll try to re-establish the imho 'proper' status quo of some 'emerged' categories/uploads. In the meanwhile please enjoy the weekend days, with my best greetings, Roland zh (talk) 20:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ) (talk) 20:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you, dear Roland, for patiently reverting my categorization of Nagerhole National Park to Heggadadevana Kote. Your logic appears to be correct. Sorry for the trouble. With regards, Prof TPMS (talk) 02:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Prof TPMS, but please let's end that kind of re-categorizations, ok? As mentioned, don't really 'like' that kind of spending time at Wikimedia, and i'm convinced, you, too. No offense and kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 15:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Illuminated_buildings_in_Udaipar[edit]

Category:Illuminated_buildings_in_Udaipar has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 20:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nirmal_Jit_Singh_Sekhon[edit]

Nirmal Jit Singh Sekhon has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Regards, KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 01:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Category by mistake[edit]

Hi, By mistake i have deleted the category "insects of idukki district" which was added in this image - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blue-tailed_Yellow_Skimmer_Palpopleura_sexmaculata.jpg. I am unable to undo it. Could you please add this again. PJeganathan (talk) 15:46, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Writers_from_India_by_language[edit]

Writers from India by language has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nirmal_Jit_Singh_Sekhon[edit]

Nirmal Jit Singh Sekhon has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Regards, KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 00:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Winners of Wiki Loves Earth 2016 (Swiss contest)[edit]

WLM CH (Deutsch)

Liebe Teilnehmende des Fotowettbewerbs Wiki Loves Earth CH

Nach einem langwierigen Auswahlprozess wurde nun die Liste der Gewinnerinnen und Gewinner hier publiziert. Wir gratuieren von ganzem Herzen und werden die Preisträgerinnen und Preisträger individuell kontaktieren. Darüber hinaus bedanken wir uns hiermit noch einmal bei allen Personen, die am Foto-Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2016 teilgenommen haben.

Wir freuen uns sehr, wenn ihr auch bei zukünftigen Wettbewerben wieder mit dabei seid!

Mit besten Grüssen,

Das Organisationsteam

WLM CH (Français)

Cher/chère participant(e) au concours Wiki Loves Earth CH,

Après une longue sélection, nous avons le plaisir d'annoncer la liste des gagnants qui est disponible ici! Nous souhaitons communiquer toutes nos félicitations aux vainqueurs, qui seront contactés séparément. Nous tenons aussi à remercier toutes les personnes qui ont participé au concours 2016.

Wikimedia CH vous invite à prendre part aux prochaines éditions!

Meilleurs salutations,

Le Comité d’organisation

WLM CH (English)

Dear Wiki Loves Earth CH participant,

After a long selection, we would like to inform you that the list of winners has been published here. Our congratulations to the winners, who will be contacted individually. We also wish to thank all the people who participated to the 2016 contest

Wikimedia CH encourages you to join us for the next editions!

With our best regards,

The organizing committee

WLM CH (Italiano)

Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Earth CH

Dopo una lunga selezione vogliamo informarti che la lista dei vincitori é stata pubblicata qui. Le nostre congratulazioni ai vincitori, che saranno contattati individualmente.

Wikimedia CH si augura di avervi ancora per i prossimi concorsi!

Saluti,

Il Comitato Organizzatore

Category:Rakesh_Sharma[edit]

Rakesh Sharma has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Regards, KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 14:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Janaki Ramachandran VNJ.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Janaki Ramachandran VNJ.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Janaki Ramachandran VNJ.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 09:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

Hi. Can I ask you to enable the option "Remove {{Check categories}} and other minor cleanup" in Cat-a-Lot preferences (img)? You are doing a great work on re-categorizing mass-uploaded images, but other people will have to check again all those tens of thousands of images to remove the {{Check categories}} template from them. You can save some time for other users enabling this option in your gadget prefs. What do you think?:) --XXN, 23:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and tank you, of course i do... and

Done :) Roland zh (talk) 03:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC) [fixed Roland zh (talk) 04:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)][reply]

Thank you! --XXN, 11:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khudiram Bose calendar art.jpg[edit]

File:Khudiram Bose calendar art.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Suhasini01.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Suhasini01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Suhasini01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suhasini01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

—SpacemanSpiff 07:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suhasini01.jpg start

Comment fürs Archiv:
...Description: తెలుగు: సుహాసిని ముఖచిత్రం సారాంశం ఈ చిత్రాన్ని ఈ దిగువన పేర్కొన్న సైటు నుండి దిగుమతి చేసాను. http://bommalu.50webs.com. Date 7 May 2007 (original upload date). Source: Transferred from te.wikipedia to Commons. Author: The original uploader was Srinivasa at Telugu Wikipedia. Licensing: GNU head Creative Commons license Creative Commons Attribution Creative Commons Share Alike.
The original description page was here. All following user names refer to te.wikipedia...2007-05-07 18:21 288×350× (18128 bytes) Srinivaa సుహాసిని ముఖచిత్రం.
File history...current 16:31, 18 May 2016 288 × 350 (18 KB) Roland zh (talk | contribs) Transferred from te.wikipedia.

end

Comment, Roland zh (talk) 13:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Haneswari_and_Vasudev_temples[edit]

Haneswari and Vasudev temples has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wert geocodierter Fotos[edit]

Hallo Roland zh, du bist sehr fleißig mit Löschanträgen auf Massenuploads. Bei deiner Auswahl frage ich mich, ob dir klar ist, dass die geocodierten Fotos als Layer in Openstreetmap eingebunden werden und dort eine wertvolle Auskunft über das tatsächliche Aussehen eines bestimmten Ortes liefern. Mit File:Idukki, Kerala, India - panoramio (11).jpg würde ich vielleicht keine Artikel in Wikipedia bebildern, aber wenn ich hier in der Karte auf das Bildsymbol klicke, erfahre ich, wie die Straße an diesem Ort aussieht und welche Vegetation es dort gibt. In ein paar Jahrzehnten wird man es auch interessant finden, welche Autos dort mal fuhren. Mir fehlt die Zeit um all deine Löschanträge daraufhin überprüfen und in den Löschdiskussionen gegebenenfalls Einspruch zu erheben. Vielleicht berücksichtigst du diesen Gedanken ja? --Sitacuisses (talk) 01:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Sitacuisses, fleißig mit Löschanträgen auf Massenuploads ist aber gar vereinfacht ausgedrückt: in Anbetracht meiner Gesamtbeiträge seit etwa 2007 von weit über 500'000 'edits' und rund 25'000 Bildern alleine auf Wikimedia Commons, machen die fleissigen (=CH, wo ich aufgewachsen bin ;-)) Löschanträge einen verschwindend kleinen Teil (deutlich unter 1%= meiner Beitrage) aus, dies sei bitte als meine 'Kerntätigkeit' in diesem Teilprojekt der Wikimedia Foundation zur Kenntnis genommen. Und soweit ich aufgrund Deiner Anmerkungen ersehen konnte, scheint die überwiegende Mehrheit der immer stichhaltig begründeten Löschanträge zumeist ohne 'Gegenstimmen' aus der Wikimedia community (zumindest stillschweigend) als sinnvoll erachtet worden sein. Wie Du ja selbst eingestehst, eignen sich solche panoramio uploads nicht zur Bebilderung in Wikipedia-Projekten, geschweige denn für externe Nutzer/innen, oder zu erzieherischen oder dokumentarischen Zwecken, was eigentlich seit den 2010er-Jahren der Hauptnutzen von Wikimedia Commons als internationale Bilddatenbank ist.

Gerade auch der Zusatznutzen der von Dir angesprochenen Geokodierungen, notabene, Du beziehst Dich offensichtlich auf panoramio uploads mit meinen Löschanträgen, ist mir in archivarisch-historischer Hinsicht bekannt; aber zB die Nutzung von Automobilen im Kontext mit der Biodiversität in Kerala dürfte wohl eher nicht dazu gehören, meint hiermit ein seit Jahrzehnten in diesem Bereich Tätiger, dem eigentlich Zeit und Lust dazu ansonsten fehlt und beides gerne nutzbringender einsetzt.

Meine 'Auswahl' bezieht sich seit einigen Wochen nur gerade auf qualitativ zweifelhafte paronamio uploads, d.h. wiederum konkreter auf COM:EDUSE und Commons:Project scope, und zwar nur für Südindien (mit einigen Ausnahmen gestern zur Stadt wo ich als Jugendlicher gelebt habe), wo ich mit Topografie, Flora und Fauna sowie Menschen und Kultur einigermassen vertraut bin.

Konkret bei File:Idukki, Kerala, India - panoramio (11).jpg, habe ich explizit – notabene zu Persönlichkeitsrechten – den Antrag gestellt, mass-upload of panoramio streams showing ident[i]ficable details (licence plates), hence, personality rights isusses, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?.

Das Foto zeigt ja eine Fahrzeugkolonne mit erkennbaren Nummernschildern und teilweise auch Personen, wobei wie von Dir als Hauptargument angeführt, gerade die Topographie nur am Rande gezeigt wird... Worauf ich nun aber gerade immer achte ist dass zumindest ein, oftmals sogar fast gleichwertiges panoramio Foto vorliegt, nämlich hier File:Idukki, Kerala, India - panoramio (10).jpg, das exakt den gleichen Ort aus einem leicht geänderten Blickwinkel zeigt, wo die genannten Einschränkungen nicht gegeben sind !

Zumindest den von Dir monierten panoramio upload könntest Du ja aus Deiner Sicht auf der Seite des Löschantrags kommentieren ?
Übrigens habe ich bislang den Randbereich meiner Beiträge zum Thema fleißig mit Löschanträgen auf Massenuploads ausschliesslich nur mit dem jeweiligen Antrag explizit mit der Frage nach Meinungen der community inititiert, aber nie weiter argumentativ auf einer Löschung insistiert. Nichts für ungut bitte, and have fun at Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 03:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nun, ich finde alleine für die letzten zwei Tage 16 LAs von dir auf der Seite des Botbetreibers. Und wenn du Zeit für 500.000 andere Beiträge hast, habe ich noch lange nicht die aktuelle Zeit für 16 Kommentare oder eine Grundsatzdiskussion mit der Adminschaft. Zum aktuellen Bild kann ich nur sagen, dass ich keinen deiner Löschgründe für valide halte. Sichtbare Nummernschilder sind IMO kein Löschgrund. Die Perspektive von Nr 10 ist nicht nur ein bisschen anders als die von Nr. 11, sondern es ist der Gegenschuss und somit ein ganz anderes Bild. Es sind sicher auch viele valide Löschanträge dabei (ich stelle ja selber auch welche, darum landen deine über User talk:Shizhao auf meiner Beobachtungsliste), aber meine Erfahrung ist, dass Adminentscheidungen hier zum großen Teil Glücksspielcharakter haben. Je mehr LAs du stellst, um so mehr Treffer erhältst du. Man kann da nur begrenzt stolz drauf sein und sollte für andere Argumente offen bleiben und nicht z. B. die Biodiversität mit den Automobilen verbinden, wenn beides getrennt voneinander das Bild für verschiedene Normalbetrachter der Landkarte wertvoll macht. --Sitacuisses (talk) 04:07, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitacuisses: Ich finde ein bisschen mehr Höflichkeit würde dir gut stehen. Roland_zh ist ein erfahrener Benutzer, der weiß, was er tut. Dass die Panoramio uploads Tausende von Kategorien zerstören (mangels genauer Einordnung) ist dir wohl egal?--Molsheimer (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo und dankeschön für Dein Votum, Molsheimer, lassen wir die Sache auf dieser Benutzerseite aber doch auf sich beruhen, insbesondere da Shizhao in diesem konkreten Fall das Bild bereits vor drei Wochen gelöscht hat, so wie sie/er übrigens bei einer Vielzahl der jeweils vorgebrachten Löschanträge davor und danach getan hat. Euch beiden ein konstruktives Wirken auf Wikimedia Commons und freundliche Grüsse, Roland zh (talk) 19:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte nicht von einem reinen Stör-, Stalking- und Vandalenaccount irritieren lassen, der schon nach seinem ersten Beitrag als Account die Ping-Vorlage und die erfahrenen Benutzer des Projekts kennt. Was er sonst noch so drauf hat sieht man hier. --Sitacuisses (talk) 23:16, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for your all category related contributions :-) Praveen:talk 02:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This still persists, so I did this.--Praveen:talk 02:49, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello Roland zh, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @VFC: , thx but I have absolutely no idea what your talking about; as far I know I don't use any "VFC gadget" ... Thanks! Roland zh (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You use it, here at line 21 (diff). I suggest you to remove the line otherwise tools might break. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:52, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steinsplitter, and thx :-) was I right to remove /*jshint scripturl:true*/mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');/*jshint scripturl:false*/, i.e. like this ?? thx and kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 18:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yepp :-). --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: thank you very much :-)) Roland zh (talk) 18:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anamalai Tiger Reserve[edit]

Category:Anamalai Tiger Reserve is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

Empty Category

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:40, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Conference project[edit]

Hello Roland,

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 19:45, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thank you MB-one, wish you a successful Commons Conference 2018 :-) season greetings, Roland zh (talk) 14:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sadhus_at_the_Ganga_Sagar[edit]

Category:Sadhus_at_the_Ganga_Sagar has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging copyvios[edit]

Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Regards, Yann (talk) 04:07, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, usually (and imho hundreds did so) I exactly do so, surprising now, hence, where I exactly missed to do so ? thx, Roland zh (talk) 04:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Migros - Jungfernfahrt SunAdele (Auschnitt aus MGB Online-Archiv).jpg[edit]

File:Migros - Jungfernfahrt SunAdele (Auschnitt aus MGB Online-Archiv).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gestumblindi (talk) 20:08, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Thirumeyyam[edit]

Category:Thirumeyyam has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 14:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sathyamurthi Perumal Temple, Roland zh (talk) 18:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Files by User:Roland zh[edit]

Following this edition, can you change the category on your User's page, please? Thanks in advance ;-) Wieralee (talk) 12:38, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since i'm not an administrator, see "This user page has been protected because as this user wants so" ;-) Kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 19:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Generic DR's[edit]

Hi Roland. Thanks for all your uploads and efforts to keep Commons free of copyvios. But please don't start DR's using a generic statement for all. And missing EXIF data and a rather small format is not a deletion reason. Please add a more compelling reason why you suspect copyvio (like you found it elsewhere online – it is pretty tiresome for closing admins to check this, and DR's are already very backlogged). Vielen dank. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P 1 9 9, thank you for your feedback, although I intended just to add these as additional reasons. hence, I'll avoid further deletion requests, also for the reason to be tired to be a 'bad girl', assumably excluding personality right issues (namely children and women) and obviously advertings related to my usual 'playground' Bitteschön und liebi Grüess, Roland zh (talk) 17:38, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Power_lines_in_Karnataka[edit]

Power lines in Karnataka has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Te750iv (talk) 13:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Power_lines_in_Andhra_Pradesh[edit]

Power lines in Andhra Pradesh has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Te750iv (talk) 13:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arboretum Zürich - Voliere 2015-02-26 12-05-21.JPG[edit]

File:Arboretum Zürich - Voliere 2015-02-26 12-05-21.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:14, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DR[edit]

Roland, I'll invite you again to read the Deletion policy, you are making unreasonable requests, that only make volunteers loses their time. So, again, read the policy, any questions use the Help desk. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 02:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, Rodrigo, "again...and again...unreasonable requests"... but, imho found no such message by you at this, my user page, or do remember any previous contact > no hint to when, where, what, not to mention a specific link, and, jederzeit, ... imho i also was not {ping}ed, "...that only make volunteers loses their time."

Spending tenthousands volunteer hours at Wikimedia Commons for 600000+ edts and 25000+ uploads, one could interprete this as a daunting insinuation to suppress a Wikimedian's point of view... :-((

ping Wikimedian's at the related page, and so needfull and deemed meaningfull by all participants, let's argue at that page in public, but avoid further harassments, bye, Roland zh (talk) 09:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Goa (196825299).jpeg

For example...

All pages at wikis are public, I'm in the correct place to talk to you. You are creating problems, and I'm talking directly to you stop and understand the issue.

The harassment is DRs not based in real arguments that makes us stop our contributions and write the same thing, over and over again.

Photos of indefinable people is not, I'll repeat, is not an argument to a deletion. You've being warned about it, and you ignore it.

You created the DR, it's your responsibility to verify it. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 20:05, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request: is from a CC BY 4.0 article and was correctly labeled as such[edit]

See doi:10.1186/s12862-017-0882-6 for source. I do not appreciate that you did not even check the source, which was properly indicated. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 10:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shri_Hari_Ram_Temple[edit]

Category:Shri_Hari_Ram_Temple has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Blademasterx (talk) 17:51, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vasu Dixit.jpg[edit]

Hi, Please do not create such DRs. This is a high quality image of a concert. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:13, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Idem for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dileep Konatham.jpg. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:21, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Female_diplomats_of_India[edit]

Female diplomats of India has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Islamic_writers_from_India[edit]

Category:Islamic_writers_from_India has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 04:14, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Monuments_and_memorials_to_Ramakrishna_Vivekananda[edit]

Category:Monuments_and_memorials_to_Ramakrishna_Vivekananda has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Riquix (talk) 05:01, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schaffhausen - Kloster Allerheiligen IMG 9818 ShiftN.jpg[edit]

File:Schaffhausen - Kloster Allerheiligen IMG 9818 ShiftN.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Buddhist people of Switzerland[edit]

Category:Buddhist people of Switzerland has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Invokingvajras (talk) 02:12, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Reliefs_and_sculptures_at_the_group_of_monuments_at_Mahabalipuram[edit]

Category:Reliefs_and_sculptures_at_the_group_of_monuments_at_Mahabalipuram has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 20:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:59th National Film Awards India winners[edit]

I listed Category:59th National Film Awards India winners which you created at Commons:Categories for discussion for greater discussion about the category. I would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/12/National Film Awards India ceremonies. Thank you! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Amber_Fort,_media_to_categorize_more_accurately[edit]

Category:Amber_Fort,_media_to_categorize_more_accurately has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deutsches barock und rokoko - herausgegeben im anschluss an die Jahrhundert-ausstellung deutscher kunst 1650-1800, Darmstadt, 1914 (1914) (14595828290).jpg[edit]

Hi, Roland zh, noticed you are having a wikibreak . If you decide to come back from your break, I was wondering if you could take a look at that image. Possibly Türkische Sklavin des Generals Werdmüller could be Hans Rudolf Werdmüller. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crimson Rose (Pachliopta hector) underside.jpg[edit]

Hi, I reverted your edit from 2018. The butterfly was not photographed in the bird sanctuary. I do hope it is the only edit you've made on my Indian images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Science_and_technology_in_Jammu_and_Kashimir[edit]

Category:Science_and_technology_in_Jammu_and_Kashimir has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Zürich - Wollishofen - Alte Kirche - Innenansicht 2010-09-10 16-20-38 ShiftN.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for restoration[edit]

Greatings! You have deleted some of my early uploaded photos without considering my misgivings. Among them some are not to be deleted. Now I rwquest you to restore those photos.

File:TKD MUZHAPPILANGAD.jpg (A renowned novelist)
File:Sunitha Kunhimangalam.jpg (A renowned mouth painter)
File:കൊട്ടിയൂര്‍ പഠനശിബിരം2016.jpg.jpg ( This image is a part of wikipedia workshop. File name shall be changed)
File:Boy at Muzhappilangad beach.jpg (One of the finest beaches in India)

Thank you -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get your responds.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People_of_the_Hyderabad_State[edit]

Category:People_of_the_Hyderabad_State has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

2A04:B2C2:1001:A900:C02B:7D49:97E9:C07F 14:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unidentified_female_models[edit]

Unidentified female models has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Brianjd (talk) 08:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Switzerland[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface by simply adding the national category.

If you take part, please consider improving the description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gewerbeschule - Museum für Gestaltung 2011-08-08 14-24-26.jpg[edit]

File:Gewerbeschule - Museum für Gestaltung 2011-08-08 14-24-26.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 02:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Subdivisions_of_states_and_union_territories_of_India[edit]

Subdivisions of states and union territories of India has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 12:50, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

Hi sir, iam Writter18, New to Wikipedia, I have a question about uploading Logo of Government organization. Is there any process in uploading Logo. Please reply me. ★ Writter18 ★←talk→ 10:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shores in Kerala[edit]

Category:Shores in Kerala is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Palosirkka (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shores in India[edit]

Category:Shores in India is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Palosirkka (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Golden_Temple_(Harmandir_Sahib)[edit]

Golden Temple (Harmandir Sahib) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ricky81682 (talk) 01:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vivekananda_Rock_Memorial_mediation_hall[edit]

Category:Vivekananda_Rock_Memorial_mediation_hall has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Riquix (talk) 08:23, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Occupy Lindenhof' in Zürich 2011-11-13 16-28-53 (SX230HS).JPG[edit]

File:'Occupy Lindenhof' in Zürich 2011-11-13 16-28-53 (SX230HS).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Politicians_in_2016_in_India[edit]

Politicians in 2016 in India has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ricky81682 (talk) 22:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ausstellung 'Der Zeit voraus - Drei Frauen auf eigenen Wegen' - Stadtmuseum Rapperswil - Alwina Gossauer 2015-09-05 16-30-16.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 11:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ausstellung 'Der Zeit voraus - Drei Frauen auf eigenen Wegen' - Stadtmuseum Rapperswil - Alwina Gossauer 2015-09-05 16-30-16.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 11:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Sihlcity - Innenansicht - Weihnachtsdekoration 2015-01-05 14-58-46 (P7800).JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 12:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ausstellung 'Der Zeit voraus - Drei Frauen auf eigenen Wegen' - Stadtmuseum Rapperswil - Martha Burkhardt, Bilder aus Asien 1911-1917, Kinderhochzeit am Ganges, Indien; Pastellkreide 2015-09-05 16-22-35.JPG[edit]

File:Ausstellung 'Der Zeit voraus - Drei Frauen auf eigenen Wegen' - Stadtmuseum Rapperswil - Martha Burkhardt, Bilder aus Asien 1911-1917, Kinderhochzeit am Ganges, Indien; Pastellkreide 2015-09-05 16-22-35.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!