User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

File:Oct 31, 1973 (Today Series, Tuesday) On Kawara.png

File:Oct 31, 1973 (Today Series, Tuesday) On Kawara.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Writ Keeper (talk) 12:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evolution of Hindu-Arabic numerals.jpg

Hi Yann,

I have been trying to add further context to File:Evolution of Hindu-Arabic numerals.jpg, since when I previously added a credit there I didn't know the proximate source of the scan. It's apparently a (1984) book chapter by Frank Swetz from a book by Campbell and Higgins. (Swetz modified Karl Menninger's original diagram by adding the "Shang numerals" box at the top). For no apparent reason, user:M.Bitton doesn't want this source to be linked, and keeps edit warring at the image description page. Do you mind adding the link(s)? Thanks! –jacobolus (t · wp · wt) 16:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I mentioned the reason: "it was edited by an admin" (after you messed with it). In any case, now that you brought it here, the admin will decide what to do and in the meantime, I will create a derivative that will be based on all the cited sources. M.Bitton (talk) 16:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission!

Hello Yann !,

Camera1 mgx
Camera1 mgx
Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en
Commons-Photographers User Group-logo-en

Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.

Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.

So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!

Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.

Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!

Best regards,

Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I upload a logo from Canva that I have created under the "self|cc-by-sa-4.0" license that will not be deleted?

Can I upload a logo from Canva that I have created under the {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} license that will not be deleted? Dhampius (talk) 19:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dhampius: Hi,
I suppose you are talking about File:ЕХФЛ.png? Why did you make for? Do you work for this organization? Yann (talk) 19:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thank you for answering. I work for the organization. We used Canva, but maybe we have chosen the wrong public license. Please, could restore the images and tell me which public license is the most suitable. We do not want to own the logo or to keep it private any public license will be ok? Dhampius (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dhampius: Well, then a formal written permission from the organization is needed. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am a volunteer and this is a non-profit organization. Can`t we just restore the image and change it with a suitable license?
If that is not possible, may I create an image with just text, if this can be approved, which license should I use so it does not get deleted?
Thanks in advance for the time and attention. Dhampius (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I undeleted the file, and created a regular DR instead. Yann (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I saw that my other picture is also deleted ЕлеазарХараш2023.jpg, could you please also restore it so I can set it with a free license?
Currently the license for ЕХФЛ.png is "{self|cc-zero}", should I keep it like this or set it to: "{cc-zero}" or "{cc-by-sa-4.0}" , I want to set it to the most free license possible. Dhampius (talk) 20:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is not the license, but who is the copyright holder, and is the file in scope?
And the issue is the same for your other files. You can request undeletion on COM:UDR, but I doubt they will be undeleted. Yann (talk) 21:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait de Vassilis Venizelos

Bonjour Yann, Vous avez retiré le portrait susnommé, mais les crédits étaient cités et l'image utilisable. Merci de préciser les raisons de l'action, ou me dire l'endroit problématique. L'erreur est possible, merci de m'aider à en faire un apprentissage ! Louzbek5097 (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Louzbek5097: Bonjour,
Le photographe est apparemment Jean-Christophe Bott. Il faut donc qu'il confirme la licence via COM:VRT/fr. Yann (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merci! Louzbek5097 (talk) 15:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't block me

I am sincerely sorry if any of my edits seemed to you like vandalism. But the truth is, yesterday I was extremely stressed and I don't want that happening to me today. Blocking me will only worsen my current situation, and now I am scared to make another edit after that warning. I hope that warning is temporary because if it stays on my record, I might have to quit Wikimedia Commons, forever... TheKumquatGuy2662 (talk) 15:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking is preventative, it is not punitive. COM:BP Honestly, if you get so stressed from discussing things in a forum, you should know when to walk away from the computer and take a walk outside or something. As long as you avoid behavior like trying to blank out a discussion when things are not going your way, you should be fine. Abzeronow (talk) 17:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Does that mean the block warning is temporary or do I have to worry about it for the rest of my life? TheKumquatGuy2662 (talk) 18:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheKumquatGuy2662: If you behave properly, you edit will be understood as one-time mistake, and will be forgotten. Yann (talk) 18:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

your opinion please...

User:隐世高人 has a pattern that I thought was disruptive, and counterpolicy.

There is nothing wrong with concluding an existing category has a less than ideal name, and deciding to do somthing about it. But 隐世高人 does the wrong thing, actually, two wrong things.

Best practice is to either (1), apply a {{Move}} template to the category, and explain why one thinks it should be renamed; or (2) initiate a rename discussion at CfD, with an explanation as to why the category should be renamed.

If the best practices are followed, and the new name is endorsed, (1) a robot does the dirty work of moving all the elements, and a (2) {{Category redirect}} is left, so the renaming does not leave a bunch of 404s.

What 隐世高人 does is (1) create their preferred category name, without getting any input from anyone else; (2) use cat-a-lot, one element at a time, to remove the old existing category, and add their new category; then finally (3) apply a {{Speedy}} deletion tag to the old category, on the grounds that it is empty. Yeah, it is empty because they just finished manually emptying it.

One reason this is a highly disruptive practice is that we have no way of knowing how many third parties had bookmarked the external URL of the old category. All those bookmarks break when the old category is deleted.

The other reason this is potentially disruptive is that, in my experience, the individuals who ignore the best practice for renaming categories are prone to pick bad names, inferior to the existing names.

You recently speedy deleted several of the categories 隐世高人 first emptied, out of process, and then requested speedy deletion, because they were empty.

I raised this at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, a couple of weeks ago, after 隐世高人 employed this tactic to Category:Coast Guard of Yemen. I am going to ping @User:Jeff G. and @User:Andy Dingley, who I think agreed with me there.

Do you concur with us, that 隐世高人 has been engaged in a disruptive activity? If you agree what do you think should be done about cleaning up after their disruption? If you think their activity is okay, could you explain why?

Here is an example:

  1. 隐世高人 moved Category:HTMS Phutthaloetla Naphalai (FFG 462) to Category:HTMS Phutthaloetla Naphalai (FF 462) ==
  2. removed Category:HTMS Phutthaloetla Naphalai (FFG 462) from File:Phutta Loetla Naphalai.jpg and added Category:HTMS Phutthaloetla Naphalai (FF 462)
  3. removed Category:HTMS Phutthaloetla Naphalai (FFG 462) from File:Aerial_port_side_view_of_the_Royal_Thai_Navy_(RTN)_His_Majestys_Thai_Ship_(HTMS)_PHUTTHALOETLA_NAPHALAI_(462)_underway_in_the_Gulf_of_Thailand_during_Cooperation_Afloat_Readiness_an_-_DPLA_-_52e4be6d61da902bf6ad99c860c41779.jpeg and added Category:HTMS Phutthaloetla Naphalai (FF 462)
  4. Added a {{Speedy}} to Category:HTMS Phutthaloetla Naphalai (FFG 462) because it was empty
  5. You deleted Category:HTMS Phutthaloetla Naphalai (FFG 462) because it was empty, even though we have no way of knowing how many third parties had bookmarked it.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 21:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Geo Swan: I know what's the proper name for this category, but if the name is controversial, a discussion should be started before renaming. Yann (talk) 21:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Other instances include:
  1. Category:HTMS_Phutthayotfa_Chulalok_(FFG_461)
  2. Category:Makut Rajakumarn (FF 433) (ship, 1971)
  3. Category:HTMS Taksin (FFG 422)
  4. Category:HTMS Naresuan (FFG 421)
  5. Category:HTMS Rattanakosin (FS 441)
  6. Category:HTMS Matchanu (ship, 1936)
  7. Category:Coast Guard Ships of Yemen
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 21:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Geo Swan: I undeleted the categories, and reverted to the redirects. These are useful anyway. Now a discussion should be started about the definitive names these should have. Yann (talk) 22:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to Yann and @Geo Swan. I agree that 隐世高人 has engaged in disruptive activity contrary to policy COM:CATRED and must stop forthwith.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete of files

Dear Yann. Please do not delete my files on Wikimedia. I create charts for Wikimedia and Kurzy.cz also. I exactly specify the license for files on file page. Antonin Cizinec (talk) 11:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Halfgroats of England

Dear Yann, a few weeks ago you have quick-deleted Category:Halfgroats of England. Not knowing the reasons, may I nonetheless ask you to undelete it, as I intend to use precisely this name in a way consistent with:

Category:Halfcrown with subcategories e.g.:
Category:Halfcrowns of England
Category:Halfcrowns of Great Britain
Category:Shilling with subcategories e.g.:
Category:Shillings of England‎
Category:Shillings of Great Britain‎

and similar examples. Such naming in turn enables different-grouped categories such as:

Category:Coins of England by name
Category:Coins of Great Britain by name

etc. (work still in progress). Thanks for your consideration, --HReuter (talk) HReuter (talk) 23:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done @HReuter: FYI. Yann (talk) 11:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected block evasion

Hello Yann! I found that a user, whose two different accounts (User talk:Chhanchhana zote hmar picture & User talk:Chhanchhana zote hmar), that you & @Krd: had blocked separately last time, had possibly committed block evasion (or abusing multiple accounts), showing same signs of unhelpful behaviours, in User talk:Chhanchhana zote and User talk:Chhanchhana zot hmar. Haoreima (talk) 05:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked. Yann (talk) 08:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And will all the uploaded files of the sock accounts be deleted?
@Jonteemil Do you find any suspected accounts of this very user (Category:Sockpuppets of Chhanchhana zote hmar) ?

About You Tube video screenshot

Is Youtube video screenshots allowed in Commons? When I can use {{Youtube}} tag as licence? Tanvir 360 (talk) 09:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) YouTube allows users to mark their videos with a Creative Commons CC BY license. If any of the videos has marked such license or any other license accepted to Wikimedia Commons, then, one can reuse it here, giving proper attribution to the original creator. But please be cautious of some videos which use pictures or videos of other people (without permission), and still giving such licenses in their description box. Haoreima (talk) 10:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arun Padiyoor.jpg

You deleted as {{Speedy}} a file with four unsuccessful D.R.s. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Thanks for pointing this out. I undeleted it. Yann (talk) 08:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gorbatchev 1950 2.png

Hello @Yann I would like, if it possible to get them, more information about the reasons why this photo is going to be deleated. If it is a source problem (it seems that the site which hosted the photo deleted it from its page since my import) I have since changed it, to another site where you can find the photo on the web. But I have doubt it is the reason Thanks in advance Penastal (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Penastal: This is most probably in the public domain in Russia, however its copyright status in USA is unclear. It would be in the public domain in USA if it was published within 30 days from the publication in Russia, but that's difficult to prove either way. Yann (talk) 13:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute

I'm aware that the dispute between myself and Andy Dingley at the "User problems" page has now become unproductive distracting from the intended topic of discussion.

I'm not sure what you think of the edit that (to my mind) started the problem. The wording of the section title- which was added at the same time he replied to myself- is obviously sarcastic in its suggestion that it

"Support topic ban from uploading any further 'creepy' images 'of people' to Commons, unless they also include an out-of-focus blob of a vehicle, to be defined individually per upload by a multi-thread discussion per [every single image that Bull-Doser uploads]".

This isn't what I was proposing and- even allowing for the fact there was some misunderstanding- the sarcasm makes clear that it wasn't (and couldn't be) a good faith attempt at representing my position or anyone else's.

Is this acceptable? As I mentioned as the discussion, this looked to me very much like a case of Commons:POINT, and the fact it was taken seriously by some and confused with my own opinion made it worse.

I would appreciate your feedback as an admin- thank you.

Ubcule (talk) 16:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing image Logo Shōgun 2024 TV series.jpg

Hello Yann,

Could you check Logo Shōgun 2024 TV series.jpg, please. Is it authorized to license it as pd-textlogo?

Sincerely, Sidney.Cortez (talk) 02:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yes. Shōgun 2024 TV is an American series, so fine. Yann (talk) 09:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Sidney.Cortez (talk) 18:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pings

Sorry for all the pings, but we need to get the errant code fixed. Please help.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Usage de la boîte de résumé

Bonjour,

Je m'exprimerai en français car cela est plus simple pour moi. Il existe une boîte de résumé qui permet de justifier une action, comme cela n'a pas été fait ici, me laissant donc dans l'incompréhension. M'accuser de vandalisme [1] est excessif, il faut supposer la bonne foi, vous faites vous aussi l'erreur de ne pas justifier votre annulation, et le message que vous avez laissé sur ma PDD n'est pas suffisant pour la comprendre.

Cordialement Cody escouade delta (d) 13:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cody escouade delta: Bonjour,
Vous faites 2 erreurs ici : 1. Il faut une raison valide pour demander une suppression imédiate. Comme cette image n'est pas une copie de celle sur FB, votre demande n'est pas valide. 2. Ne répétez pas un message supprimé par un admin qui connaît bien les règles de Commons. Yann (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

one easy way to track and find copyright violation

Hi, first option must be Instagram to find copyright of these kind of uploader. because they change name of file you can not find it on google image. it is easiest way to track through Instagram page. 99 percent of these file uploads from Instagram pages illegally. just copy paste name of file name in google gave you person Instagram page you can easily find the original image.

for example these user. all uploads are from Instagram page i find two of them in seconds

[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 16:48, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we often have images copied from Instagram, but there is no general rules. IIRC Instagram is blocked in Iran, isn't? Yann (talk) 18:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

namely blocked by government but all population even official used it by proxy? [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 01:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hogwarts Legacy – Official 4K Reveal Trailer.webm

File:Hogwarts Legacy – Official 4K Reveal Trailer.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Nosferattus (talk) 19:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete File:Sexy pony at the beach.png?

It does not, to my knowledge, depict an identifiable copyrighted character from MLP:FIM. You can’t copyright an art style. This was a highly improper speedy deletion and should be undone and, if you are still not convinced, be sent to standard deletion so other users can weigh in. Dronebogus (talk) 22:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done as you like. Yann (talk) 22:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

Earlier today I posted on my talk page about the unblock and the previous hour saw Andy Dingley respond to my post "I would strongly oppose any unblock!" by response of my warning of the police last May and for me to stop uploading celebrity/people pictures caused by this, forcing me an exclusivity to upload car pictures. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 12:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Officially, how long until my unblock? - Bull-Doser (talk) 03:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
“Indefinitely”. Now stop bugging Yann and do something more productive on or off wiki. Dronebogus (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tegan Nox in March 2020.jpg

Hi,

You deleted file:Tegan Nox in March 2020.jpg here on Commons. The same file en:File:TeganNox2020Cropped.png is on the English Wikipedia, and I am looking at whether it should be deleted. Can you know the exact reason for deletion? See also my notes at en:File talk:TeganNox2020Cropped.png. Thanks, -- Whpq (talk) 13:53, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is a copyvio. I tagged it there. Yann (talk) 14:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am trying to understand why it is a copyvio. As per my notes on the file talk page, the initial source currently does not show a CC license, but the archive does show a CC license, and CC licenses are not revocable. -- Whpq (talk) 14:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I didn't see that. But since the video was removed on YT, I wonder if the license was valid. I undeleted it and created a regular DR instead. Yann (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For me, the issue would be if the performance itself is copyrighted by WWE. -- Whpq (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think a performance can be under a copyright (at least certainly not one like this). Copyright starts when something is recorded or fixed in a tangible medium. But the quality is poor, so I wonder if the YT user recorded it live, or copied it from somewhere else. Yann (talk) 14:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking that professional wrestling is a scripted performance, but it really is only loosely scripted so you are right it isn't an issue. -- Whpq (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cas d'école sur photo de collection Studio Harcourt d'avant 1991

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:BrigitteAuber-1954-Harcourt.png

Bonjour cher Yann,

J'espère que tu vas bien malgré tes nombreuses activités et contributions ici et IRL. ;)

Si tu veux bien donner ton avis concernant les principes (assez pointus il faut le reconnaitre) concernan la collection de photo Studio Harcourt.

  • Les photos de cette collection d'avant 1991 sont considérés appartenir à l'État français et de facto conformément à la réglementation nationale, être automatiquement portée au Domaine Public.
  • Les photos du Studio Harcourt ont été définitivement qualifées d'oeuvres collectives dont aucun de ses différents auteurs ou collaborateurs ne peut être distingué spécifiquement.
  • Même si une mention de copyright contraire est publiée, le domaine public s'applique sur Commons et WP, dès lors que la mention "Studio Harcourt" est clairement spécifiée comme crédit.

On m'oppose certains arguments d'ancienneté d'une photo (70 ans minimum) alors que d'autres photos de la collections Harcourt bien plus récentes ont bien été publiées dans Commons sous licence libre, y compris par les Studio Harcourt eux-mêmes ou par d'autres musées.

Merci de confirmer ces points très spécifiques au droit et à la règlementation française. Je vais aussi solliciter plusieurs de nos autres amis experts ici.

Je te souhaite une excellente fin de journée. Tisourcier (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Cette photo sera dans le domaine public en France l'année prochaine. Pour les Etats-Unis, c'est beaucoup moins clair. Je suis plutôt contre de supprimer des documents quand le statuts vis-à-vis de l'URAA n'est pas clair, mais je suis en minorité sur ce point. Yann (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yann&oldid=859075640"